LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lloyd-Williams, Kathryn
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: BF, RC0321
The following thesis consists of three papers; a literature review, an empirical\ud paper and a reflective paper. The literature review summarises current knowledge regarding the efficacy of\ud systemic family therapy in neurorehabilitation. Studies investigating the impact\ud of brain injury on the family suggest that all family members should be included\ud in their injured relatives’ rehabilitation programme due to the risk of developing\ud relational difficulties. In view of this, family therapy has become increasingly\ud popular amongst Clinical Psychologists and other professionals working in\ud neurorehabilitation. This review aims to critically evaluate the efficacy of\ud systemic family therapy within neurorehabilitation. Methodological\ud considerations and implications for future research are discussed, as well as\ud clinical and service implications.\ud The empirical paper explores changes in children’s relationships when a parent\ud acquires a brain injury. The findings of the study highlight the positive and\ud negative changes children experience in their relationships as a result of their\ud parents’ acquired brain injury (ABI). Results are discussed in relation to the\ud current literature, consideration of the strengths and limitations of the research,\ud clinical implications and recommendations for future research.\ud The reflective paper discusses the researcher’s own experience of carrying out\ud the research. The researcher utilised the ‘Heartstrings’ activity used in the\ud empirical study to help them reflect on changes in their relationships throughout\ud the research process.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article