LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Walker, S. (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RT

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: female genital diseases and pregnancy complications, reproductive and urinary physiology
Over the last decade, there has been a loss in confidence and eroded skills due to the near universal policy of advising caesarean section in the wake of the Term Breech trial (Hannah et al 2000). Breech birth has been increasingly viewed as a complication, and management of the breech presenting baby at term has shifted firmly into the realm of obstetric practice in most parts of the\ud UK. Small pockets of exception remain, among NHS and independent midwives who have maintained their skills with breech birth and are sought out by women denied the choice of a vaginal birth elsewhere. With continued focus on consumer choice, women led care and increasing normality, we urgently need to address the issue of how the NHS can safely provide the option of normal breech birth before these skills are permanently lost. This article suggests ways midwives may play a role within the NHS in ensuring women have a choice to birth their breech babies normally, in the safest possible way.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bisits A (2002). Upright positioning in breech births: an obstetrician's impression, New South Wales: Birthrite.
    • CESDI (2000). Seventh Annual Report, London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium.
    • Cronk M (1998). 'Hands off the breech'. The Practising Midwife, 1(6): 13-15.
    • DH (2007). Maternity matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service, London: Crown.
    • DH (2006). NHS maternity statistics, England: 2004-05, London: The Information Centre.
    • Evans J (2005). Breech birth - what are my options? AIMS Press.
    • Evans J (2012). 'Understanding physiological breech birth'. Essentially MIDIRS, 3(2):17-21.
    • Fahy K (2011a). 'Do the findings of the Term Breech trial apply to spontaneous breech birth'? Women and Birth, 24(1): 1-2.
    • Fahy K (2011b). 'Is breech birth really unsafe? Treatment validity in the Term Breech Trial'. Essentially MIDIRS, 2(10): 17-21.
    • Glezerman M (2006). 'Five years to the Term Breech trial: the rise and fall of randomized controlled trials'. Am Jo of Obs and Gyn, 194(1): 20-25.
    • Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA et al (2000). 'Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial'. Lancet, 356(9239): 1375- 1383.
    • Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME and Lawrie TA (2011). 'Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery'. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 9.
    • Kotaska A (2004). 'Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery'. Br Med Jo, 329(7479): 1036-1039.
    • Marshall J (2010). 'Facilitating vaginal breech birth at term'. In: Marshall J and Raynor M (eds). Advancing skills in midwifery practice, Edinburgh: Elsevier.
    • MCWP (2007). Making normal birth a reality: Consensus statement from the Maternity Care Working Party. London: NCT / RCM / RCOG.
    • Narayan H and Garrard F (2011). Rethinking provision of care: a radical restructuring of antenatal services for women with complex pregnancies. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 21(3): 279-285.
    • NICE (2011). Multiple pregnancy: the management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period. NICE clinical guideline 129, London: NICE.
    • NMC (2007). Midwives rules and standards. London: NMC.
    • RCOG (2006a). The Management of Breech Presentation, Green top guideline: 20b. London: RCOG.
    • RCOG (2006b). External cephalic version and reducing the Incidence of breech presentation, Green top guideline: 20a. London: RCOG.
    • Sandall J, Homer C, Sadler E et al (2011). Staffing in maternity units: getting the right people in the right place at the right time. London: The King's Fund.
    • Su M, McLeod L, Ross S et al (2003). 'Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech trial'. Am Jo of Obs and Gyn, 189(3): 740-745.
    • Tiran D (2010). 'Complementary therapies in midwifery: a focus on moxibustion for breech presentation'. In: Marshall J and Raynor M (eds), Advancing Skills in Midwifery Practice, Edinburgh: Elsevier.
    • Verhoeven AT, de Leeuw JP and Bruinse HW (2005). 'Breech presentation at term: elective caesarean section is the wrong choice as a standard treatment because of too high risks for the mother and her future children'. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 149: 2207-2210.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article