Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Azacis, Helmuts; Gillman, Max; Cardiff University (2008)
Publisher: Cardiff University
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: HB
The paper presents an endogenous growth economy with a representation of the tax rate system in the Baltic countries. Assuming that government spending is a given fraction of output, the paper shows how a �at tax system balanced between labor and corporate tax rates can be second best optimal. It then computes how actual Baltic tax reforms from 2000 to 2007 affect the growth rate and welfare, including transition dynamics. Comparing the actual reform effects to hypothetical tax experiments, it results that equal �at tax rates on personal and corporate income would have increased welfare in all three Baltic countries by 24% more on average than the actual reforms. This shows how equal, balanced, �at rate taxes can be optimal in both theory and practice. Further, movement towards a more equal balance between labor and capital tax rates, through changing just one tax rate, achieved almost as high or higher utility gains as in actual law for all three countries under both open and closed economy cases. This shows benefits of moving towards the optimum.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Atkinson, A. and Stiglitz, J. (1980). Lectures on public economics, McGrawHill, London.
    • Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy 98: S103 –S125.
    • Devereux, M. and Love, D. (1994). The e¤ects of factor income taxation in a two-sector model of endogenous growth, Canadian Journal of Economics 27: 509 –536.
    • Funke, M. and Strulik, H. (2006). Taxation, growth and welfare: Dynamic e¤ects of Estonia’s 2000 Income Tax Act, Finnish Economic Papers 19(1): 25 –38.
    • IMF (1999a). Republic of latvia: Selected issues and statistical appendix, Sta¤ Country Report 99/99, IMF.
    • IMF (1999b). Republic of lithuania: Selected issues and statistical appendix, Sta¤ Country Report 99/96, IMF.
    • IMF (2000a). Republic of estonia: Statistical appendix, Sta¤ Country Report 00/102, IMF.
    • IMF (2000b). Republic of latvia: Selected issues and statistical appendix, Sta¤ Country Report 00/100, IMF.
    • IMF (2001). Republic of lithuania: Statistical appendix and tax summary, Sta¤ Country Report 01/40, IMF.
    • Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E. and Siu, H. E. (2005). Fluctuations in convex models of endogenous growth II: Business cycle properties, Review of Economic Dynamics 8(4): 805–828.
    • Judd, K. L. (1992). Projection methods for solving aggregate growth models, Journal of Economic Theory 58(2): 410–452.
    • Kim, S. (1998). Growth e¤ect of taxes in an endogenous growth model: to what extent do taxes a¤ect economic growth?, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23: 125 –158.
    • Ljungqvist, L. and Sargent, T. (2000). Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
    • Lucas, Jr., R. E. (1990). Supply-side economics: An analytical review, Oxford Economic Papers (42): 293–316.
    • Lucas, R.E., J. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3 –42.
    • McGrattan, E. and Prescott, E. (2005). Taxes, regulations, and the value of US and UK corporations, Review of Economic Studies 72: 767 –796.
    • McGrattan, E. R. and Prescott, E. C. (2000). Is the stock market overvalued?, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 24(4): 20– 40.
    • Mendoza, E., Razin, A. and Tesar, L. (1994). E¤ective tax rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption, WP 4864, NBER.
    • Mitchell, D. J. (2007). The global ‡at tax revolution, Cato policy report, Cato Institute, Washington DC.
    • Obstfeld, M. and Rogo¤, K. (1996). Foundations of International Macroeconomics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Stokey, N. and Rebelo, S. (1995). Growth e¤ects of ‡at-rate taxes, Journal of Political Economy 103(3): 519 –550.
    • Turnovsky, S. J. (1995). Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
    • Turnovsky, S. J. (2000). Fiscal policy, elastic labor supply, and endogenous growth, Journal of Monetary Economics 45(1): 185–210.
    • 0 t 2 c 0 t 2 y 0 t 2 z 0 t 2 z 0 t 2 c 0 t 2 y 0 t 2 u 0 t 2 c
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article