LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lu, J.; Jones, A.; Morgan, G. (2016)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: otorhinolaryngologic diseases
There is debate about how input variation influences child language. Most deaf children are exposed to a sign language from their non-fluent hearing parents and experience a delay in exposure to accessible language. A small number of children receive language input from their deaf parents who are fluent signers. Thus it is possible to document the impact of quality of input on early sign acquisition. The current study explores the outcomes of differential input in two groups of children aged two to five years: deaf children of hearing parents (DCHP) and deaf children of deaf parents (DCDP). Analysis of child sign language revealed DCDP had a more developed vocabulary and more phonological handshape types compared with DCHP. In naturalistic conversations deaf parents used more sign tokens and more phonological types than hearing parents. Results are discussed in terms of the effects of early input on subsequent language abilities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Akhtar, N. (2005). The robustness of learning through overhearing. Developmental Science, 8, 199-209.
    • Anderson, D. & Reilly, J. (2002). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Normative Data for American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 83-106.
    • Arnesen, K., Enerstvedt, R. T., Engen, E. A., Engen, T., Hoie, G., & Vonen, A. M. (2008). The linguistic milieu of Norwegian children with hearing loss. American Annals of the Deaf, 153, 65-77.
    • Baker, A. E. & Woll, B. (2009). Sign Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Bello A., Giannantoni P., Pettenati P., Stefanini S., & Caselli M. C. (2012). Assessing lexicon: Validation and developmental data of the Picture Naming Game (PiNG), a new picture naming task for toddlers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47, 589-602.
    • Best, C. T., Mathur, G., Miranda, K. A., and Lillo-Martin, D. (2010). Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 747-762.
    • Bornstein, M. (1989). Sensitive periods in development: structural characteristics and casual interpretations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 179-197.
    • Boyes-Braem, P. (1990). Acquisition of the handshape in American Sign Language. In Volterra, V. & Erting, C.K. (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children (pp. 107-127). New York: Springer Verlag.
    • Chamberlain, C., Morford, J., & Mayberry, R. I. (1999). Language Acquisition by Eye. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
    • Clibbens, J. & Harris, M. (1993). Phonological processes and sign language development. In D. Messer & G.Turner (Eds). Critical influences on child language acquisition and development (pp. 197-208). London: Macmillan, New York: St Martin's Press.
    • Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day Wild Child. Perspectives in Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics, Boston, MA: Academic Press.
    • Emmorey, K., Bellugi, U., Friederici, A. & Horn, P. (1995). Effects of age of acquisition on grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 1-23.
    • Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (5, Serial No. 242).
    • Ferjan Ramirez, N., Lieberman, A.M., & Mayberry, R.I. (2013). The initial stages of language acquisition begun in adolescence: When late looks early. Journal of Child Language, 40(2), 391-414.
    • Masoura, E. & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign vocabulary learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 383-388.
    • Mayberry, R. I. & Fischer, S. D. (1989). Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of nonnative sign language processing. Memory and Cognition, 17, 740-754.
    • Mayberry, R. I. & Eichen, E. B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 486-512.
    • Mayberry, R. I. (2010). Early Language Acquisition and Adult Language Ability: What Sign Language reveals about the Critical Period for Language. In M. Marschark & P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, (vol. 2, pp. 281-291). New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Mayne, A., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Sedey, A.L., & Carey, A. (2000). Expressive vocabulary development of infants and toddlers who are deaf or hard of hearing. The Volta Review, 100(5), 1-28.
    • Meier, R. P., Cormier, K., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (Eds.) (2002). Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Meier, R. P. (2005). The forms of early signs: explaining signing children's articulatory development. In B. Schick, M. Marschark, and P. Spencer (Eds.), Advances in the Sign-Language Development of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children (pp. 202-230). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Moeller, M. P. (2000). Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics,106, E43.
    • Morford, J. P. (2003). Grammatical development in adolescent first language learners. Linguistics, 41(4), 681 - 721.
    • Morford, J. P., Grieve-Smith, A. B., MacFarlane, J., Staley, J., and Waters, G. S. (2008). Effects of language experience on the perception of American Sign Language. Cognition, 109, 41-53.
    • Morgan, G. (2014). Critical period in language development. In P. Brooks, & V. Kempe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language development. (Vol. 3, pp. 116-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    • Morgan, G (2014b). On language acquisition in speech and sign: development of combinatorial structure in both modalities. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences. 5:1217
    • Morgan, G., Barrett-Jones, S. & Stoneham, H. (2007). The first signs of language: phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 3-22
    • Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (2002). The development of complex sentences in British Sign Language. In G. Morgan & B. Woll (Eds.), Directions in Sign Language Acquisition (pp. 255-275). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press..
    • Musselman, C., & Akamatsu, C. T. (1999). Interpersonal communication skills of deaf adolescents and their relationship to communication history. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 305-320.
    • Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14 (1990), pp. 11-28.
    • Newport, E. L. (2002). Critical Periods in Language Development. In L. Nadel, (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Cognitive Science. London: Macmillan.
    • Ormel, E., Crasborn O. & van der Kooij, E. (2013). Coarticulation of hand height in Sign Language of the Netherlands is affected by contact type. Journal of Phonetics, 41- 2/3: 156-71.
    • Petitto, L. A. (1997). In the beginning: On the genetic and environmental factors that make early language acquisition possible. In M. Gopnik (Ed.), The inheritance and innateness of grammars (pp. 45-69). England: Oxford University Press.
    • Petitto, L. A., Holowka, S., Sergio, L., & Ostry, D. (2001). Language rhythms in baby hand movements. Nature, 413, 35-36.
    • Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Schick, B., Marschark, M., & Spencer, P.E.(2005). Advances in the Sign Language Development of Deaf Children. New York: Oxford University Press
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article