Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
MacLeod, Nicola J.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
This study investigates the discursive patterns of interactions between police interviewers and women reporting rape in significant witness interviews. Data in the form of video recorded interviews were obtained from a UK police force for the purposes of this study. The data are analysed using a multi-method approach, incorporating tools from micro-sociology, Conversation Analysis and Discursive Psychology, to reveal patterns of interactional control, negotiation, and interpretation. The study adopts a critical approach, which is to say that as well as describing discursive patterns, it explains them in light of the discourse processes involved in the production and consumption of police interview talk, and comments on the relationship between these discourse processes and the social context in which they occur. A central focus of the study is how interviewers draw on particular interactional resources to shape interviewees? accounts in particular ways, and this is discussed in relation to the institutional role of the significant witness interview. The discussion is also extended to the ways in which mainstream rape ideology is both reflected in, and maintained by, the discursive choices of participants. The findings of this study indicate that there are a number of issues to be addressed in terms of the training currently offered to officers at Level 2 of the Professionalising Investigation Programme (PIP) (NPIA, 2009) who intend to conduct significant witness interviews. Furthermore, a need is identified to bring the linguistic and discursive processes of negotiation and transformation identified by the study to the attention of the justice system as a whole. This is a particularly pressing need in light of judicial reluctance to replace written witness statements, the current „end product? of significant witness interviews, with the video recorded interview in place of direct examination in cases of rape.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Amir, N., Stafford, J., Freshman, M.S., Foa, E.B. (1998) „Relationship between trauma narratives and trauma pathology‟ Journal of Traumatic Stress 11 (2), 385 - 392.
    • Brazil, D. (1992) „The Communicative Value of Intonation‟ Discourse Analysis Monograph 8, 2nd ed. University of Birmingham ELR.
    • Bublitz, W., & Bednarek, M. (2006) „Reported speech: pragmatic aspects‟ Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, London: Elsevier, 550 - 553.
    • Burt, M. R. (1980) „Cultural myths and supports for rape‟ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 217 - 230.
    • Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. (1987) „Reported speech in written narrative texts‟ Discussing Discourse: Discourse Analysis Monograph 14, English Language Research, University of Birmingham, 149 - 67.
    • Caldas-Coulthard, C.R., & Coulthard, M. (Eds.) (1996) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge.
    • Dobash, R.E. & Dobash, R.P. (Eds.) (1998) Rethinking Violence Against Women, London: Sage.
    • Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1992) Talk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Edward, K.E, & MacLeod, M. (1999) „The Reality And Myth Of Rape: Implications For The Criminal Justice System‟ Expert Evidence 7 (1), 37 - 58.
    • Edwards, D. (2005) „Discursive Psychology‟ in Fitch, K.L. & Sanders, R.E, Handbook of Language & Social Interaction, Erlbaum, 257 - 273.
    • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology, London: Sage.
    • Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970) „On Formal Structures of Practical Actions‟ in J.C. McKinney & E.A. Tiryakian, (Eds.) Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 337 - 366.
    • Haworth, K.J. (2009) „An analysis of police interview discourse and its role(s) in the judicial process‟. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.
    • Henley, N. & Kramarae, C. (1991) „Gender, Power and Miscommunication‟ In Coupland, N., Giles, H. and Wiemann, J.M. (eds.) Miscommunication and Problematic Talk, Newbury, Park, California: Sage, 18 - 43.
    • Hepburn, A. (2004) „Crying: Notes on Description, Transcription and Interaction‟ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (3), 251 - 290.
    • Heritage, J. (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J.Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 299 - 345
    • Heritage, J. (1985) „Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience‟ in T. van Dijk (Ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, London: Academic Press, 95 - 117.
    • Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R. (1974) „Formulations as Conversational Objects‟ in G. Psathas (Ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, New York: Irvington, 123 - 162.
    • Moore, S. (2009) „Cautionary tales: Drug facilitated sexual assault in the British media‟ Crime, Media, Culture 5, 305 - 320.
    • Moore, A. & Reynolds, P. (2004) „Feminist Approaches to Sexual Consent: A Critical Assessment‟ in Cowling, M. & Reynolds, P. (eds.) Making Sense of Sexual Consent, Aldershot: Ashgate, 29 - 44.
    • Morgan, K. (2006) „Cheating wives and vice girls: the construction of a culture of resignation‟ Women's Studies International Forum 29 (5), 489 - 498.
    • Newburn, T.A. & Stanko, E.A. (1994) Just Boys Doing Business?: Men, Masculinities and Crime, London: Routledge, 46 - 63.
    • Newburn, T., Williamson, T. and Wright, A. (Eds.) (2007) Handbook of Criminal Investigation, Cullompton: Willan.
    • Newbury, P. & Johnson, A. (2006) „Suspects‟ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview‟ International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 13 (2), 213 - 240.
    • Norton, R. & Grant, T. (2008) „Rape myth in true and false rape allegations‟ Psychology, Crime & Law 14 (4), 275 - 285.
    • van Dijk, T. (1996) „Discourse, power and access‟ in Caldas-Coulthard, C.R., & Coulthard, M. (eds.) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Routledge, 84 - 106.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article