Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Suckley, Louise; Kelly, Shona; Legge, David; Pinder, James
Languages: English
Types: Unknown

The purpose of this paper is to explore the influence of the physical workspace and work health on workplace connectivity (level and type of interactions). It summarises the first stage of research being undertaken by an interdisciplinary team of researchers on a university engineering research department that is relocating into temporary office accommodation. The research incorporates the measurement of spatial and social connectivity, as well as work health on two occasions: prior to the relocation from traditional cellular office accommodation and following the relocation into an open plan workspace. On completion of both stages, comparisons will be made to assess for changes that could be attributed to the change in workspace.


The measurements taken before the move to temporary accommodation showed a limited level of physical connectivity in the traditional cellular office space. There were a number of individuals in the research department that had a much greater level of social connectivity but no pattern emerged in terms of their physical location in the workspace. However a pattern did emerge with regard to work health and social connectivity, where those with a high level of connectivity also had a high level of work stress.


The practical implications of the research are to demonstrate a methodology for assessing social connectivity with workspace and health that can be applied to other organisations. It makes a contribution to the fields of work psychology, facilities management and environmental psychology that has not before considered spatiality and social connectivity with work health.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity, The Academy of Management Journal, 39, pp. 1154-1184.
    • Belkic, K.L., Landsbergis, P.A., Schnall, P.L., Baker, D. (2204) Is job strain a major source of cardiovascular disease risk? Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 30(2) pp. 85-128.
    • Boutellier, R., Ullman, F., Schreiber, J. and Naef, R. (2008) Impact of office layout on communication in a science-driven business, R&D Management, 38 ( 4) pp. 372-391.
    • Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • DeSalvo, K.B., Bloser, N., Reynolds, K., He, J., Muntner, P. (2006) Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question: a meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(3) pp.
    • Cohen S., Kamarck T., Mermelstein R. (1983) A global measure of perceived stress Journal of Health & Social Behaviour, 24, pp. 385-396.
    • Cross, R. and. Borgatti, S.P. (2004) The Ties that Share: Relational Characteristics that Facilitate Information Seeking, in Huysman, M. and Wulf, V. (Eds.) Social Capital and Information Technology MIT Press, pp. 137-159.
    • Fayard, A.L. and Weeks, J. (2007) Photocopiers and water-coolers. The affordances of informal interaction, Organization Studies, (28) pp. 605-634.
    • Gladwell, M. (2000) Designs for Working, The New Yorker, December 11 pp.61-70.
    • Hanneman, R.A. (2001) Introduction to social network methods Riverside: University of California Haynes, B.P. (2007) The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity, Journal of Facilities Management, 5 (3) pp. 158-171.
    • Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Huczynski, A. and Buchanan, D. (2007) Organizational behaviour: an introductory text (6th Ed), Pearson Education Ltd Karasek, R. and Theorell, T. (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life New York, Basic Books Inc.
    • Kelly, S. J. (2003). Self-reported health: stitching together a picture from the fabric of life. Individual Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Programme Vancouver, University of British Columbia.
    • Kinman, G and Court, S. (2010). Psychosocial hazards in UK universities: adopting a risk assessment approach Higher Educational Quarterly, 64, pp.413-428.
    • Lubart, T.I. (2001) Models of the creative process: past, present and future, Creativity Research Journal, 13 (3/4) pp. 295-308.
    • Martens, Y. (2011) Creative workplace: instrumental and symbolic support for creativity, Facilities, 29 (1/2) pp. 63-79.
    • van Veqchel, N., de Jonge, J., Bosma, H., Schaufeli, W. (2005) Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Social Science and Medicine, 60 (5), pp. 117- 131.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article