Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Widiarto, Indra; Emrouznejad, Ali (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Microfinance has been developed as alternative solution for global poverty alleviation effort in the last 30 years. Microfinance institution (MFI) has unique characteristic wherein they face double bottom line objectives of outreach to the poor and financial sustainability. This study proposes a two-stage analysis to measure Islamic Microfinance institutions (IMFIs) performance by comparing them to conventional MFIs. First, we develop a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) framework to measure MFIs' efficiency in its double bottom line objectives, i.e. in terms of social and financial efficiency. In the second stage non-parametric tests are used to compare the performance and identify factors that contribute to the efficiency of IMFIs and MFIs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Armendariz, B., & Szafarz, A. (2011). On Mission Drift in Microfinance. In B. Armendariz & M. Labie (Eds.), Handbook of Microfinance (1st ed., pp. 341-365). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd.
    • Armendariz de Aghion, B., & Morduch, J. (2005). The Economics of Microfinance. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    • Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Batesse, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    • Comim, F. (2007). Poverty Reduction through Microfinance: A Capability Perspective. In B. Balkenhol (Ed.), Microfinance and Public Policy: Outreach, Performance and Efficiency (pp. 47-59). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Conning, J. (1999). Outreach, sustainability and leverage in monitored and peer-moPnitored lending. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 51-77. I
    • Conning, J., & Morduch, J. (2011). Microfinance and Social Investment. Annual RReview of Financial Economics, 3(1), 407-434.
    • Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models and Interpretations. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. SeMiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 1-39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.
    • Di Martino, P., & Sarsour, S. (2012). Microcredit in Palestine ( 1995 - 2008 ): A Business History Perspective. Business History, 54(3), 441-461.
    • Dichter, T. W. (1996). Questioning the future of NGOs in microfinance. Journal of International Development, 8(2), 259-269.
    • Diop, A., Hillenkamp, I., & Servet, J.-M. (2007). Poverty versus Inequality. In B. Balkenhol (Ed.), Microfinance and Public Policy: Outreach, Performance and Efficiency (pp. 27-46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Emrouznejad, A., & Amin, G. R. (2009). DEA models for ratio data: Convexity consideration. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(1), 486-498.
    • Emrouznejad, A., & Anouze, A. L. (2009). A note on the modeling the efficiency of top Arab banks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5741-5744.
    • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in Refficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 151-157. C S
    • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290. U
    • Hermes, N., Lensink, R., & Meesters, A. (2011). Outreach and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions. World Development, 39(6), 938-948.
    • Johnston, D., & Morduch, J. (2008). The Unbanked: Evidence from Indonesia. The World TBank Economic Review, 22(3), 517-537.
    • Nanayakkara, G., & Iselin, E. R. (2012). An Exploratory Study of the Performance of Microfinancing Institutions Using the Balanced Scorecard Approach. International Journal of Business and Information, 7(2), 165-204.
    • Navajas, S., Schreiner, M., Meyer, R. L., Gonzalez-vega, C., & Rodriguez-meza, J. (2000). Microcredit and the Poorest of the Poor: Theory and Evidence from Bolivia. World Development, 28(2), 333-346.
    • Nghiem, H. S., Coelli, T., & Rao, P. (2006). The Efficiency of Microfinance in Vietnam: Evidence from NGO Schemes in the North and The Central Region. International JTournal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 25, 71-78.
    • Schreiner, M. (2002). Aspects of Outreach: A Framework for the Discussion of the Social Benefits of Microfinance. Journal of International Development, 14, 591-603.
    • Sedzro, K., & Keita, M. (2009). Assessing the Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of International Finance and Economics, 9(2), 54-68.
    • Segrado, C. (2005). Case study: Islamic microfinance and socially responsible investments. (Case Study Report to University of Torino). Retrieved from http://www.saa.unito.it/meda/pdf/Islamic microfinance.pdf
    • Seibel, H. D. (2008). Islamic Microfinance in Indonesia: The Challenge of InstitutionPal Diversity, Regulation, and Supervision. Journal of Social Issues in Southeast AsIia, 23(1), 86-103.
    • Tchakoute-Tchuigoua, H. (2010). Is there a difference in performance by the legal status of microfinance institutions? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(4), 436-442. e c n e d 4 9 0 i
    • n 6 9 1 f
    • ito .1 .1 .1 no
    • la -3 -2 -3 c
    • g 5
    • e 9
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article