Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Odusanya, K; Coombs, C; Doherty, NF (2015)
Publisher: Association for Information Systems
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Despite huge global spend on IS/IT, empirical evidence shows many of these investments do not deliver expected benefits. Benefits are realized when organizations attend to contextual factors surrounding the implementation of IT and not just its technical implementation. Culture, as a contextual factor, has been shown to have a strong influence on the way IS/IT is adopted, used and exploited. We draw from IS organizational culture studies to show how individual/group IT cultures (IT culture archetypes) offer a user-centric perspective on benefits exploitation from IS/IT investments. The majority of benefits are achieved later into the lifecycle of an IS/IT investment, after implementing the IS/IT resource. Thus, this study investigates post adoption experience of an organization's IS/IT investment, an important systems lifecycle stage that has received less attention in the IS literature. We adopt a single in-depth case study approach incorporating a three stage mixed data collection strategy. From a theoretical perspective, IT culture offers an intuitive approach to address IS/IT benefits management challenges during the post-adoption stage. From a practitioner perspective, we believe findings from this study, will offer several managerial implications for business and IT managers on specific actions to realize greater benefits from their IS/IT investments.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ashurst, C., and N. F. Doherty (2003). “Towards the formulation of 'a best practice' framework for benefits realization in IT projects.” Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 6(2), 1- 10.
    • Ashurst, C., N.F. Doherty, and J. Peppard (2008). “Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model.” European Journal of Information Systems, 17(4), 352- 370.
    • Barki, H. and J. Hartwick (1994). “Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude.” MIS Quarterly, 59-82.
    • Bhaskar, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester Press, Hassocks, England
    • Cavaye, A. L. (1996). “Case study research: a multi‐faceted research approach for IS.” Information Systems Journal, 6(3), 227-242.
    • Nord, J. H., G. D. Nord, S. Cormack and A. Cater-Steel (2007). “IT culture: its impact on communication and work relationships in business.” International Journal of Intercultural Information Management, 1(1), 85-107.
    • Peppard, J. and J. Ward (2005). “Unlocking Sustained Business Value from IT Investments.” California Management Review 10(4): 52-69.
    • Peppard, J., Ward, J., and Daniel, E. (2007). “Managing the Realization of Business Benefits from IT Investments.” MISQ Executive
    • Robey, D., J. W. Ross, and M. C. Boudreau (2002). “Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change.” Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 17-46.
    • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
    • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA.
    • Serra, C. E. M and M. Kunc (2015). “Benefits Realisation Management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies.” International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 53-66.
    • Sundaram, S., A. Schwarz, E. Jones, and W. Chin (2007). “Technology Use on the Front Line: A Longitudinal Analysis of How Technology Enhances Individual Performance.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 35, 101-112.
    • Straub, D., K. Loch, R. Evaristo, E. Karahanna, and M. Srite (2002). “Toward a theory-based measurement of culture.” Human Factors in Information Systems, 61-82.
    • Tajfel, H. E. 1978. Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
    • Thorp, J. 1998. The information paradox - Realising the business benefits of information technology. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
    • Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis (2003). “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.” MIS Quarterly, 425-478.
    • Wagner, E., and S. Newell (2007). “Exploring the importance of participation in the postimplementation period of an ES project: A neglected area.” Journal of the AIS, 8(10), 508-524.
    • Walsh, I. (2014). “A strategic path to study IT use through users' IT culture and IT needs: A mixedmethod grounded theory.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 146-173.
    • Walsh, I. and H. Kefi, (2008). “The spinning top model, a new path to conceptualize culture and values: applications to IS research.” In: Twenty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems. Paris, France.
    • Walsh, I., H. Kefi, and R. Baskerville (2010). “Managing culture creep: Toward a strategic model of user IT culture.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(4), 257-280.
    • Ward, J., and R. Elvin (1999). “A new framework for managing IT-enabled business change.” Information Systems Journal 9.3 (1999): 197-221.
    • Ward, J., S. De Hertogh and S. Viaene (2007). “Managing benefits from IS/IT investments: An empirical investigation into current practice.” In System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 206a-206a). IEEE.
    • World Bank (2014). “Gross Domestic Product 2013.” URL: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/GDP.pdf (visited 23/10/2014)
    • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article