LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dahlmann, Frederik; Veal, Gareth (2016)
Publisher: College Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: K1, TJ, HC, HD
In this paper we investigate whether innovative and flexible contractual arrangements can support the process of achieving ambitious sustainability goals. We explore this question through an analysis of the role of umbrella agreements in driving energy savings in the building sector. Drawing on a case study of the iconic Empire State building, we examine the typical challenges faced by clients and contractors in devising suitable agreements that facilitate managing contractual and performance risks, as well as the sharing of responsibilities and cooperation between multiple project stakeholders. We find that the project arrangements appear to exhibit the adoption of the key characteristics commonly found in umbrella agreements which incorporate sustainability measures that maximize income through efficient delivery of outcomes. Specifically, this means that they need to enable stakeholders to manage repeated review cycles, complex perceptions and expectations, and different tacit assumptions and codes of behaviour, as well as managing and communicating in networks and obtaining agreement also from non-contractual parties. Moreover, we demonstrate that umbrella agreements can facilitate a network perspective of business relationships by emphasizing value co-creation and the embeddedness of firms within a network of interactions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ANDERSEN, M. S. 2007. An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability Science, 2, 133-140.
    • BARNES, B. R., NAUDÉ, P. & MICHELL, P. 2007. Perceptual gaps and similarities in buyer-seller dyadic relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 662-675.
    • BARQUET, A. P. B., DE OLIVEIRA, M. G., AMIGO, C. R., CUNHA, V. P. & ROZENFELD, H. 2013. Employing the business model concept to support the adoption of product-service systems (PSS). Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 693-704.
    • BAZERMAN, M. H. & MALHOTRA, D. 2006. It's Not Intuitive: Strategies for Negotiating More Rationally. Negotiation, 9.
    • BEDDINGTON, J. 2008. Managing energy in the built environment: Rethinking the system. Energy Policy, 36, 4299-4300.
    • BSRIA 2014. Energy Services in North America 2014. Bracknell, UK: Building Services Research and Information Association.
    • COLVILLE, I. & PYE, A. 2010. A sensemaking perspective on network pictures. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 372-380.
    • DAVIES, H. A. & CHAN, E. K. S. 2001. Experience of energy performance contracting in Hong Kong. Facilities, 19, 261-268.
    • DECANIO, S. J. 1998. The eficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energysaving investments. Energy Policy, 26, 441-454.
    • DELBRIDGE, R. & EDWARDS, T. 2013. Inhabiting Institutions: Critical Realist Refinements to Understanding Institutional Complexity and Change. Organization Studies.
    • DOE-EERE 2007. Attachement J-7: Energy savings performance contract risk, responsibility and performance matrix. In: TEAM, U. S. D. O. E. E. E. A. R. E. (ed.). Washington, D.C.
    • DOE-EERE 2015. Energy Service Companies: What is an ESCo? In : TEAM, U. S. D. O. E. E. E. A. R. E. (ed.). Washington, D.C.
    • EGGING, R. 2013. Drivers, trends, and uncertainty in long-term price projections for energy management in public buildings. Energy Policy, 62, 617-624.
    • ELMAN, C. 2005. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. International Organization, 59, 293-326.
    • ESB. 2009. A landmark sustainability program for the Empire State Building Available: http://www.esbnyc.com/ sites/default/files/ESB_White_Paper_061809.pdf
    • ESB. 2013a. Empire State Building Performance Year 2 M&V Report March 1, 2013 Rev.1. Available: http:// www.esbnyc.com/sites/default/files/2013_esb_y2_full_report.pdf [Accessed 12/12/2014].
    • ESB. 2013b. Empire State Building: Schedule A: Project Description (redacted version of energy services performance contract for the Empire State Building retrofit project) [Online]. New York: Jones Lang LaSelle. Available: http:// www.esbnyc.com/documents/sustainability/Redacted_Schedules_for_Retrofit_project_2.doc [Accessed January 2014.
    • ESB. 2013c. Empire State Building: Sustainability & Energy Eficiency [Online]. New York: Empire State Building. Available: http://www.esbnyc.com/sustainability_energy_eficiency.asp [Accessed January 2014.
    • EVO. 2002. International Performance Measurement & Verification Protocol: Concepts and Options for Determining Energy and Water Savings. I. Available: http://www.evo-world.org/index.php?option=com_content& view=article&id=272&Itemid=379&lang=en
    • FELDMAN, D. 1984. The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
    • FORD, D., GADDE, L.-E. & HÅKANSSON, H. 2003. Managing business relationships, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    • FORD, D., GADDE, L.-E., HÅKANSSON, H., SNEHOTA, I. & WALUSZEWSKI, A. Analysing business interaction. IMP Conference Upssala, 2008.
    • FRANKEL, D. & TAI, H. 2013. Giving US energy eficiency a jolt. Available: http://www.mckinsey.com/ insights/energy_resources_materials/giving_us_energy_eficiency_a_jolt [Accessed January 2014].
    • FULTON, M. & GRADY, H. 2012. United States Building Energy Eficiency Retrofits - Market Sizing and Financing Models. Available: http://www.dbcca.com/research [Accessed January 2014].
    • GADDE, L.-E., HUEMER, L. & HÅKANSSON, H. 2003. Strategizing in industrial networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 357-364.
    • GIBBERT, M., RUIGROK, W. & WICKI, B. 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1465-1474.
    • GLADWIN, T. N., KENNELLY, J. J. & KRAUSE, T.-S. 1995. Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
    • GOLDMAN, C. A., HOPPER, N. C. & OSBORN, J. G. 2005. Review of US ESCO industry market trends: an empirical analysis of project data. Energy Policy, 33, 387-405.
    • HOLMES, S. & SMART, P. 2009. Exploring open innovation practice in firm-nonprofit engagements: a corporate social responsibility perspective. R&D Management, 39, 394-409.
    • IEA 2013a. Energy Eficiency Market Report 2013- Market Trends and Medium-Term Prospects. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
    • IEA. 2013b. OECD/IEA World Energy Outlook 2013. Available: http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/ publications/weo-2013/.
    • JLL. 2009. Empire State Building Press Conference. Ray Quartararo, Jones Lang Lasalle [Online]. Available: http://www.esbnyc.com/sites/default/files/esb_jones_lang_lasalle_statement.pdf [Accessed 22/01/2015].
    • LEEK, S. & MASON, K. 2009. Network pictures: Building an holistic representation of a dyadic business-tobusiness relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 599-607.
    • LUCIO, N. R., LAMAS, W. D. Q. & DE CAMARGO, J. R. 2013. Strategic energy management in the primary aluminium industry: Self-generation as a competitive factor. Energy Policy, 59, 182-188.
    • MARSHALL, R. S. & BROWN, D. 2003. The Strategy of Sustainability: A systems perspective on environmental initiatives. California Management Review, 46, 101-126.
    • MASON, K. & SPRING, M. 2011. The sites and practices of business models. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1032-1041.
    • MILLER, K. D. & TSANG, E. W. K. 2011. Testing management theories: critical realist philosophy and research methods. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 139-158.
    • MONTIEL, I. & DELGADO-CEBALLOS, J. 2014. Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability: Are We hTere Yet? Organization & Environment, 27, 113-139.
    • MOUZAS, S. 2006. Negotiating Umbrella Agreements. Negotiation Journal, 22, 279-301.
    • MOUZAS, S. & BLOIS, K. 2013. Contract research today: Where do we stand? Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 1057-1062.
    • MOUZAS, S. & FORD, D. 2006. Managing relationships in showery weather: The role of umbrella agreements. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1248-1256.
    • MOUZAS, S. & FORD, D. 2009. The constitution of networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 495-503.
    • MOUZAS, S., HENNEBERG, S. & NAUDÉ, P. 2008. Developing network insight. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 167-180.
    • NEE, V. 1998. Norms and networks in economic and organizational performance. American Economic Review, 85-89.
    • NG, I., DING, D. X. & YIP, N. 2013. Outcome-based contracts as new business model: The role of partnership and value-driven relational assets. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 730-743.
    • NG, I. & NUDURUPATI, S. 2010. Outcome-based service contracts in the defence industry - mitigating the challenges. Journal of Service Management, 21, 656-674.
    • NISHANT, R., TEO, T. S. H. & GOH, M. 2014. Energy Eficiency Benefits: Is Technophilic Optimism Justiifed? Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 61, 476-487.
    • NOAA. 2013. Degree day statistics: States and Cities [Online]. Washington DC, USA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/ degree_days/ [Accessed January 2014.
    • POPPO, L. & ZENGER, T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23, 707-725.
    • QIAN, D. & GUO, J. E. 2014. Research on the energy-saving and revenue sharing strategy of ESCOs under the uncertainty of the value of Energy Performance Contracting Projects. Energy Policy, 73, 710-721.
    • QIAN, Q. K., CHAN, E. H. & KHALID, A. G. 2015. Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the Transaction Costs (TCs). Sustainability, 7, 3615-3636.
    • QIAN, Q. K., CHAN, E. H. W. & CHOY, L. H. 2012. Real estate developers' concerns about uncertainty in building energy eficiency (BEE) investment - A transaction costs (TCS) perspective. Journal of Green Building, 7, 116-129.
    • RAGIN, C. C. & BECKER, H. S. 1992. What is a case?: exploring the foundations of social inquiry, Cambridge university press.
    • REUER, J. J. & ARIÑO, A. 2007. Strategic alliance contracts: dimensions and determinants of contractual complexity. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 313-330.
    • RUSINKO, C. A. 2007. Green Manufacturing: An Evaluation of Environmentally Sustainable Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Competitive Outcomes. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 54, 445-454.
    • SARKIS, J., DE BRUIJN, T. & ZHU, Q. 2013. Guest Editorial: Sustainability in Engineering ManagementSetting the Foundation for the Path Forward. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60, 301-314.
    • SCHALTEGGER, S., LÜDEKE-FREUND, F. & HANSEN, E. G. 2012. Business cases for sustainability: the role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6, 95-119.
    • SCHLEICH, J. & GRUBER, E. 2008. Beyond case studies: Barriers to energy eficiency in commerce and the services sector. Energy Economics, 30, 449-464.
    • SESHADRI, S. 2013. The sustainability syndicate: Shared responsibility in a trans-organizational business model. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 765-772.
    • SITOH, M. K., PAN, S. L. & CHING-YING, Y. 2014. Business Models and Tactics in New Product Creation: hTe Interplay of Efectuation and Causation Processes. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 61, 213-224.
    • SORRELL, S. 2007. The economics of energy service contracts. Energy Policy, 35, 507-521.
    • STORBACKA, K. 2011. A solution business model: Capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 699-711.
    • STORBACKA, K., WINDAHL, C., NENONEN, S. & SALONEN, A. 2013. Solution business models: Transformation along four continua. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 705-716.
    • STUBBS, W. & COCKLIN, C. 2008. Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model”. Organization & Environment, 21, 103-127.
    • TUKKER, A. 2004. Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 246-260.
    • UNEP. 2012. GEO5: Global Environment Outlook 5 - Environment for the future we want [Online]. Valetta, Malta: UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme. Available: http://www.unep.org/geo/geo5.asp.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article