Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Houghton, C.; Murphy, K.; Meehan, B.; Thomas, J.; Brooker, D.; Casey, D. (2017)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, nvivo, dementia, framework synthesis, qualitative evidence synthesis, sensitivity analysis, Data Collection, Dementia, Humans, Nursing Research, Qualitative Research, Research Design

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences and perceptions of healthcare staff caring for people with dementia in the acute setting. This article focuses on the methodological process of conducting framework synthesis using nvivo for each stage of the review: screening, data extraction, synthesis and critical appraisal. BACKGROUND: Qualitative evidence synthesis brings together many research findings in a meaningful way that can be used to guide practice and policy development. For this purpose, synthesis must be conducted in a comprehensive and rigorous way. There has been previous discussion on how using nvivo can assist in enhancing and illustrate the rigorous processes involved. DESIGN: Qualitative framework synthesis. METHODS: Twelve documents, or research reports, based on nine studies, were included for synthesis. CONCLUSION: The benefits of using nvivo are outlined in terms of facilitating teams of researchers to systematically and rigorously synthesise findings. nvivo functions were used to conduct a sensitivity analysis. Some valuable lessons were learned, and these are presented to assist and guide researchers who wish to use similar methods in future. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Ultimately, good qualitative evidence synthesis will provide practitioners and policymakers with significant information that will guide decision-making on many aspects of clinical practice. The example provided explored how people with dementia are cared for acute settings.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alzheimer's Society (2009) Counting the Cost. Caring for People with Dementia on Hospital Wards. Available at: https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/site/scri pts/download_info.php?fileID=787 (accessed 6 July 2016).
    • ATLAS/ti (1999) ATLAS/ti. Version 4.2. [Computer Software]. Scientific Software Development, Berlin.
    • Barnett-Page E & Thomas J (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology 9, 59.
    • Bassett BR (2009) Computer-based analysis of qualitative data: NVIVO. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (Mills AJ, Durepos G & Wiebe E eds). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 192-194.
    • Bazeley P (2007) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.
    • Bergin M (2011) NVivo 8 and consistency in data analysis: reflecting on the use of a qualitative data analysis program. Nurse Researcher 18, 6-12.
    • Bringer JD, Johnston LH & Brackenridge CH (2004) Maximising transparency in a doctoral thesis 1: The complexities of writing about the use of QSR*NVivo within a Grounded Theory study. Qualitative Research 4, 247-265.
    • Britten N, Campbell R, Pope C, Donovan J, Morgan M & Pill R (2002) Using meta-ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 7, 209-215.
    • Brooker D (2007) Person-Centred Dementia Care: Making Services Better. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK.
    • Brooker D & Lantham I (2016) PersonCentred Dementia Care. Making Services Better with the VIPS Framework. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK.
    • Brunton J & Thomas J (2012) Information management in reviews. In An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (Gough D, Oliver S & Thomas J eds). Sage Publications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 83-106.
    • Brunton J, Stansfield C & Thomas J (2012) Finding relevant studies. In An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (Gough D, Oliver S & Thomas J eds). Sage Publications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 107-134.
    • Cahill S, O'Shea E & Pierce M (2012) Creating Excellence in Dementia Care. A Research Review for Ireland's National Dementia Strategy. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10147/306721 (accessed 6 July 2016).
    • Campbell R, Pound P, Morgan M, DakerWhite G, Britten N, Pill R, Yardley L, Pope C & Donovan J (2011) Evaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment 15, 1-164.
    • Carroll C, Booth A & Cooper K (2011) A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology 11, 29.
    • Carroll C, Booth A, Leaviss J & Rick J (2013) “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology 13, 37.
    • Casey D, O'Hara MC, Meehan B, Byrne SF & Murphy K (2014) A mixed methods study exploring the factors and behaviours that affect glycaemic control following a structured education program: the Irish DAFNE Study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 6-9.
    • di Gregorio S (2000) Using NVivo for your literature review. Paper presented at Strategies in Qualitative Research: issues and results from analysis using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST, London.
    • Dixon-Woods M (2011) Using frameworkbased synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BioMed Central Medicine 9, 39-40.
    • Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B & Sutton A (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10, 45-53.
    • Downe S, Simpson L & Trafford K (2007) Expert intrapartum maternity care: a meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 57, 127-140.
    • EPPI (2010) EPPI Centre Methods for Conducting Systematic Reviews. Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK.
    • Finfgeld D (2003) Metasynthesis: the state of the art-so far. Qualitative Health Research 13, 893-904.
    • Finfgeld-Connett D (2010) Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66, 246-254.
    • Finfgeld-Connett D & Johnson ED (2013) Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69, 194-204.
    • Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S & Redwood S (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology 13, 117.
    • Gough D (2007) Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education 22, 213-228.
    • Houghton C, Casey D, Shaw D & Murphy K (2013) Approaches to rigour in qualitative case study research. Nurse Researcher 20, 12-17.
    • Houghton C, Murphy K, Brooker D & Casey D (2016) Healthcare staffs' experiences and perceptions of caring for people with dementia in the acute setting: qualitative evidence synthesis. International Journal of Nursing Studies 61, 104-116.
    • Howell Major C & Savin-Baden M (2010) An Introduction to Qualitative Research Synthesis: Managing the Information Explosion in Social Science Research. Routledge, Oxon, UK.
    • Johnston BM, Milligan S, Foster C & Kearney N (2011) Self-care and end of life care-patients' and carers' experience a qualitative study utilising serial triangulated interviews. Supportive Care in Cancer 20, 1619-1627.
    • Jordan J, Rose L, Dainty KN, Noyes J & Blackwood B (2015) Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 7, Art. No.: CD011812.
    • Lathlean J (2010) Qualitative analysis. In The Research Process in Nursing, 6th edn (Gerrish K & Lacey A eds). WileyBlackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 423-436.
    • Leech NL & Onwuegbuzie AJ (2011) Beyond constant comparison qualitative data analysis: using NVivo. School Psychology Quarterly 26, 70-84.
    • Lloyd Jones M (2004) Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing 48, 271-278.
    • MacMillan K & Koenig T (2004) The wow factor: preconceptions and expectations for data analysis software in qualitative research. Social Science Computer Review 22, 179-186.
    • Noblit GW & Hare RD (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
    • Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, Hannes K & Booth A (2008) Chapter 20: Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.0.1 ed. (Higgins JPT & Green S eds). John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane. org/chapter_20/20_qualitative_research_ and_cochrane_reviews.htm (accessed 6 July 2016).
    • Oliver S, Dickson K & Newman M (2012) Getting started with a review. In An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (Gough D, Oliver S & Thomas J eds). Sage Publications Ltd, London, UK, pp. 66-82.
    • QDATRAINING Ltd (2013) Making Sense of the Coding Comparison Query in NVivo. Available at: http://qdatraining. com/making-sense-of-the-coding-compa rrison-query-in-nvivo/ (accessed 6 July 2016).
    • Ritchie J & Spencer L (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing Qualitative Data (Bryman A & Burgess RG eds). Routledge, London, UK, pp. 173-194.
    • Sandelowski M, Barroso J & Voils CI (2007) Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in Nursing & Health 30, 99-111.
    • Silverman D (2010) Doing Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London, UK.
    • Sinkovics RR & Alfoldi EA (2012) Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative research: the enabling role of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). Management International Review 52, 817-845.
    • Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A, Oliver S, Sutcliffe K, Rees R, Brunton G & Kavanagh J (2004) Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews: an example from public health. British Medical Journal 328, 1010-1012.
    • Thomas J & Harden A (2008) Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BioMed Central Medical Research Methodology 8, 45.
    • Thomas J, Brunton J & Graziosi S (2010) EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: Software for Research Synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London, UK.
    • Thorne S (2009) The role of qualitative research within an evidence-based context: can metasynthesis be the answer? International Journal of Nursing Studies 46, 569-575.
    • Thorne S, Paterson B, Acorn S, Canam C, Joachim G & Jillings C (2002) Chronic illness experience: insights from a metastudy. Qualitative Health Research 12, 437-452.
    • Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, Noblit G & Sandelowski M (2004) Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research 14, 1342-1365.
    • Valderas JM, Ricci N & Campbell SC (2012) Patient Experiences of Patient Safety in Primary Care. A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Research Protocol. Public Health Resource Unit, London, UK.
    • Walsh D & Downe S (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50, 204-211.
    • Ward DJ, Furber C, Tierney S & Swallow V (2013) Using framework analysis in nursing research: a worked example. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69, 2423-2431.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article