Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Orosz, G; Dombi, E; Andreassen, CS; Griffiths, MD; Demetrovics, Z (2016)
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Work addiction ('workaholism') has become an increasingly studied topic in the behavioral addictions literature and had led to the development of a number of instruments to assess it. One such instrument is the Bergen Work Addiction Scale (BWAS - Andreassen et al. 2012 Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 265-272). However, the BWAS has never been investigated in Eastern-European countries. The goal of the present study was to examine the factor structure, the reliability and cut-off scores of the BWAS in a comprehensive Hungarian sample. This study is a direct extension of the original validation of BWAS by providing results on the basis of representative data and the development of appropriate cut-off scores The study utilized an online questionnaire with a Hungarian representative sample including 500 respondents (F = 251; M age = 35.05 years) who completed the BWAS. A series of confirmatory factor analyses were carried out leading to a short, 7-item first-order factor structure and a longer 14-item seven-factor nested structure. Despite the good validity of the longer version, its reliability was not as high as it could have been. One-fifth (20.6 %) of the Hungarians who used the internet at least weekly were categorized as work addicts using the BWAS. It is recommended that researchers use the original seven items from the Norwegian scale in order to facilitate and stimulate cross-national research on addiction to work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed., ). Washington, DC: American Psychatric Association.
    • Andreassen, C. S. (2014). Workaholism: an overview and current status of the research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3, 1-11. doi:10.1556/JBA.2.2013.017.
    • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 265-272.
    • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationship between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2, 90-99.
    • Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J., Kravina, L., Jensen, F., & Pallesen, S. (2014a). The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a representative sample of Norwegian employees. PloS One, 9, e102446. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102446.
    • Andreassen, C. S., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2014b). Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29, 7-24.
    • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(31), 86-91.
    • Brown, R. I. F. (1993). Some contributions of the study of gambling to the study of other addictions. In W. R. Eadington, & J. A. Cornelius (Eds.), Gambling behavior and problem gambling (pp. 241-272). Reno: University of Nevada Press.
    • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
    • Brunner, M., Nagy, G., & Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 796-846.
    • Griffiths, M. D. (2005). Workaholism is still a useful construct. Addiction Research and Theory, 13, 97-100.
    • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
    • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
    • Makra, M., Farkas, D., & Orosz, G. D2012]. Validation of Hungarian work-family conflict questionnaire and the analysis of predictors of work-family balance. Hungarian Psychological Review, 67D3], 491-518 Din Hungarian].
    • Molino, M. (2013). Workaholism: definitions, measures, and dynamics [PhD]. Torino: University of Torino.
    • Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2007). Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: a conceptual integration and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 111-136.
    • O'Brian, C. P., Volkow, N., & Li, T. K. (2006). What's in a word? Addiction versus dependence in DSM-V. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 764-765.
    • Oates, W. (1971). Confessions of a workaholic. New York: World.
    • Salanova, M., Del Líbano, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2014). Engaged, workaholic, burned‐out or just 9‐to‐5? Toward a typology of employee well‐being. Stress and Health, 30(1), 71-81.
    • Salavecz, et al. (2011). Work, worklessness and the political economy of health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65(9), 746-750.
    • Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
    • World Health Organization (2013). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical and descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article