Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Roger Penlington; Biddy Casselden; Lalith Liyanage; Rebecca Strachan (2011)
Publisher: Association for Learning Technology
Journal: Research in Learning Technology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: P100, professional body, e-learning, Education, work based learning; professional body; e-learning; distance learning; online learning, L, work based learning, distance learning, online learning

Classified by OpenAIRE into

Higher education provision typically requires learners to physically attend sessions on campus. The economic climate has changed significantly over the past few years in the UK and globally. Inevitably changes to student funding and the increased competitive nature of the job market have impacted on university teaching. The use of work based learning (WBL) is an alternative flexible form of learning that attempts to tackle these issues. It enables students to learn whilst they work, addressing the funding issues, and enhancing their employability through the acquisition of higher professional qualifications. Often such WBL programmes are designed, delivered and supported from the view of the student and academic staff with little consideration of other stakeholders such as employers, workplace mentors and professional bodies and the input they can bring to enrich the learning and teaching provision. This paper presents the findings from a survey conducted among stakeholders from all four pillars of WBL, namely the learner, the academic environment, the workplace and the external context. Online questionnaires and interviews were carried out with students, tutors, program leaders, employers and professional bodies from four postgraduate programmes at the university. The results show that while there is a reluctance to embrace technology among some academic staff, students are generally positive about using the technology. The survey also demonstrates that there is a lack of creativity and imagination in the use of technology, where often platforms such as virtual learning environments are used simply as repositories for presentation slides, handouts, etc. The results of the study conclude or rather remind all involving parties to pay more emphasis on quality of online programme delivery by embracing technology and use it in novel and imaginative ways to provide a learning and teaching provision fit for the twenty-first century.Keywords: work based learning; professional body; e-learning; distance learning; online learning
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bennett, S. 2010. Interview on WRLS. (accessed June 16, 2010).
    • Boud, D., and N. Solomon. 2001. Work-based learning: a new higher education? 1st ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Brennan, J., and B. Little. 2006. Towards a strategy for workplace learning: report of a study to assist HEFCE in the development of a strategy for workplace learning. London: Centre for Higher Education Research & Information. http://oro.open.ac.uk/6437/1/towards astrategyrd09_06.pdf. (accessed June 8, 2010).
    • Butakov, S. and S. Vladislav. 2009. The toolbox for local and global plagiarism detection. Computers and Education, 52, no. 4: 781 788 [Online]. http://www.sicencedirect.com (accessed July 25, 2011).
    • Chong, B., M.G. Martinsons, and M. Wong. 2004. Adoption of e-Learning for work-based training: An exploratory study of the Hong Kong apparel industry. International Journal Innovation and Learning, 1, no. 3: 312 26 [Online].
    • Durrant, A., G. Rhodes, and D. Young. 2009. University-level work based learning. Middlesex, UK: Middlesex University Press.
    • Evans, N. 2001. From once upon a time to happily ever after: the work-based Learning in the UK higher education sector. In Work-based learning: a new higher education, ed. D. Boud and N. Solomon. 61 73. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
    • Glass, A., K. Higgins, and A. McGregor. 2002. Delivering work based learning. http:// www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2002/06/14558/3244. (accessed July 25, 2011).
    • HESA. 2011. Students and qualifiers data tables, statistics online, higher education statistics agency. http://www.hesa.ac.uk/index.php/content/view/1973/239/. (accessed July 25, 2011).
    • IBM. 2011. SPSS statistical analysis software package, IBM. http://www-01.ibm.com/software/ analytics/spss. (accessed July 25, 2011).
    • Liyanage, L. 2010. From traditional to technology enabled tertiary education in Sri Lanka. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
    • Liyanage, L., A. Pasqual, and C. Wright. 2010. Lessons learned in managing ICT systems for online-Learning. 5th Conference of Learning International Networks Consortium (LINC) University Leadership: Bringing Technology-Enabled Education to Learners of All Ages From May 23 26. The campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://linc.mit.edu/linc2010/proceedings/session9Liyanage.pdf (accessed April 30, 2011).
    • Liyanage, L., R. Strachan, S. Keogh, and S. Hanlon. 2010. Evaluation of using distance learning to support work-based learning programmes: a case study from Northumbria University, UK. E-Learn 2010, Orlando, Florida (accessed October 19, 2010).
    • LTech. 2011. Learning technologies of Northumbria University. http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/ sd/central/ar/academy/ltechhomepage/?view Standard[Accesssed date]
    • Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
    • Nixon, L., K. Smith, R. Stafford, and S. Camm. 2006. Work-based learning: llluminating the higher education landscape [Online]. York: The Higher Education Academy. http:// www.asetonline.org/documents/wbl_illuminating.pdf (accessed May 30, 2010).
    • Pickard, A.J. 2007. Research methods in information. London: Facet Publishing.
    • QSR. 2011. NVivo software, QSR International Available at: http://www.qsrinternational.com/ products_nvivo.aspx.
    • Rowe, N.C. 2004. Cheating in online student assessment: beyond plagiarism. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, VII, [Online]. http://www.westga.edu/ distance/ojdla/ summer72/rowe72.html (accessed February 18, 2011).
    • Stake, R.E. 2003. Case studies. In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, ed. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln. Chapter 16. London: Sage.
    • Taylor, J. 2001. Fifth generation distance education. e-Journal of Instructional Science & Technology, 4, no. 1: 1 14 [Online]. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/136/. (accessed July 25, 2011).
    • University of Northumbria. 2010. Work-based learning framework. www.northumbria.ac.uk/ sd/central/ar/lll/lla/. (accessed July 25, 2011).
    • Yin, R.K. 2002. Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed. Newbury Park, London: Sage.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article