LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mishu, Mahbub C.; Schroeder, Jan Walter (2015)
Publisher: IEEE
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:
Human skin deformation occurs due to external loading. As a result, blood flow in soft tissue becomes low and also the oxygenation decreases. Tissue under continuous loading results in tissue necrosis and leads to pressure ulcer (PU), also known as bedsore, decubitus ulcer, and ischemia. The amount of external load applied to the body support surface is associated with a subject's BMI (body mass index). Therefore interface pressure (IP) at the skin and the surface is the result of a subject's physical and support surface properties. Interface pressure increases, the blood flow decreases and a subject starts developing stage-1 pressure ulcer. Previous research suggests that interface pressure of 32 mmHg (4.26 kPa) can cause PU, but there is no strong evidence to show at what time that pressure is reached. Also interface pressure changes from subject to subject due to their body compositions. Three risk assessment scales are available to predict overall risk of PU formation. But none of these scales take interaction of body support surface materials into account. Also these do not provide any information at which area a subject is at risk of PU formation. In this work a study is presented where external load at different bony areas are measured using 11 volunteers. By measuring the external load for 11 subjects (age:33 ± 7 yrs and BMI:25.04 ± 3.01 kg/m2) at different bony areas, the relationship with the total body weight was identified. A mathematical model is proposed to predict the risk of PU formation combining the Waterlow risk assessment scales for bony areas and a graphic user interface to predict this is discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] A. Manohar and D. Bhatia, “Pressure detection and wireless interface for patient bed,” in Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, 2008. BioCAS 2008. IEEE. IEEE, 2008, pp. 389-392.
    • [2] L. R. Solis, A. Liggins, R. R. Uwiera, N. Poppe, E. Pehowich, P. Seres, R. B. Thompson, and V. K. Mushahwar, “Distribution of internal pressure around bony prominences: implications to deep tissue injury and effectiveness of intermittent electrical stimulation,” Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1740-1759, 2012.
    • [3] N. Graves, F. Birrell, and M. Whitby, “Effect of pressure ulcers on length of hospital stay,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 293-297, 2005.
    • [4] G. Bennett, C. Dealey, and J. Posnett, “The cost of pressure ulcers in the uk,” Age and Ageing, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 230-235, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://ageing.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/3/230.abstract
    • [5] C. Hsia, K. Liou, A. Aung, V. Foo, W. Huang, and J. Biswas, “Analysis and comparison of sleeping posture classification methods using pressure sensitive bed system,” in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE. IEEE, 2009, pp. 6131-6134.
    • [6] M. Reddy, S. S. Gill, and P. A. Rochon, “Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review,” Jama, vol. 296, no. 8, pp. 974-984, 2006.
    • [7] H. F. Clarke, C. Bradley, S. Whytock, S. Handfield, R. van der Wal, and S. Gundry, “Pressure ulcers: implementation of evidence-based nursing practice.” Journal of advanced nursing, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 578-590, 2005.
    • [8] C. V. Bouten, C. W. Oomens, F. P. Baaijens, and D. L. Bader, “The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound?” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 616-619, 2003.
    • [9] S. Saha, M. B. Smith, A. Totten, R. Fu, N. Wasson, B. Rahman, M. Motuapuaka, D. H. Hickam et al., “Pressure ulcer treatment strategies: Comparative effectiveness,” 2013.
    • [10] C. W. Oomens, D. L. Bader, S. Loerakker, and F. Baaijens, “Pressure induced deep tissue injury explained,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1-9, 2014.
    • [11] M. C. Mishu, V. N. Dubey, T. F. Hickish, and J. Cole, “Mathematical modelling of different types of body support surface for pressure ulcer prevention,” International Journal of Medical, Pharmaceutical Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 209-214, 2014.
    • [12] J. Waterlow, “Pressure sores: a risk assessment card.” Nursing times, vol. 81, no. 48, pp. 49-55, 1984.
    • [13] P. Papanikolaou, P. Lyne, and D. Anthony, “Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers: a methodological review,” International journal of nursing studies, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 285-296, 2007.
    • [14] L. Bolton, “Which pressure ulcer risk assessment scales are valid for use in the clinical setting?” Journal of Wound Ostomy & Continence Nursing, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 368-381, 2007.
    • [15] C. L. Sistrom and C. W. Garvan, “Proportions, odds, and risk 1,” Radiology, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2004.
    • [16] D. M. Brienza, P. E. Karg, M. J. Geyer, S. Kelsey, and E. Trefler, “The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 529-533, 2001.
    • [17] E. Smejkal, M. Wissestad, M. Wood, and T. Kernozek, “The relationship between peak seat interface pressures and the braden scale.”
    • [18] J. Kottner, A. Gefen, and N. Lahmann, “Weight and pressure ulcer occurrence: a secondary data analysis,” International journal of nursing studies, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1339-1348, 2011.
    • [19] H. Goede, S. Tijssen, H. Schipper, N. Warren, R. Oppl, F. Kalberlah, and J. Van Hemmen, “Classification of dermal exposure modifiers and assignment of values for a risk assessment toolkit,” Annals of Occupational Hygiene, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 609-618, 2003.
    • [20] M. R. Spitz, W. K. Hong, C. I. Amos, X. Wu, M. B. Schabath, Q. Dong, S. Shete, and C. J. Etzel, “A risk model for prediction of lung cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 715-726, 2007.
    • [21] M. J. Magee, M. A. Herbert, T. M. Dewey, J. R. Edgerton, W. H. Ryan, S. Prince, and M. J. Mack, “Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: development of a predictive risk algorithm,” The Annals of thoracic surgery, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1707-1712, 2007.
    • [22] E. V. McCloskey, H. Johansson, A. Oden, and J. A. Kanis, “From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the frax algorithm,” Current osteoporosis reports, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 77-83, 2009.
    • [23] D. Rocke, W. Murray, C. Rout, and E. Gouws, “Relative risk analysis of factors associated with difficult intubation in obstetric anesthesia,” Anesthesiology, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 67-73, 1992.
    • [24] G. Assmann, P. Cullen, and H. Schulte, “Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective cardiovascular mu¨nster (procam) study,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 310-315, 2002.
    • [25] C. Chai and D. Bader, “The physiological response of skin tissues to alternating support pressures in able-bodied subjects,” Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, vol. 28, pp. 427-435, 2013.
    • [26] C. VanGilder, G. MacFarlane, S. Meyer, and C. Lachenbruch, “Body mass index, weight, and pressure ulcer prevalence: An analysis of the 2006-2007 international pressure ulcer prevalence surveys,” Journal of nursing care quality, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 127-135, 2009.
    • [27] M. D. Stinson, A. Porter-Armstrong, and P. Eakin, “Seat-interface pressure: A pilot study of the relationship to gender, body mass index, and seating position,” Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 405-409, 2003.
    • [28] R. Sopher, J. Nixon, C. Gorecki, and A. Gefen, “Exposure to internal muscle tissue loads under the ischial tuberosities during sitting is elevated at abnormally high or low body mass indices,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 280-286, 2010.
    • [29] D. R. Berlowitz, G. H. Brandeis, J. N. Morris, A. S. Ash, J. J. Anderson, B. Kader, and M. A. Moskowitz, “Deriving a risk-adjustment model for pressure ulcer development using the minimum data set,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 866-871, 2001.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article