Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kroll, Ehud; Koskela, Lauri
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: HD28, QA75, HD
The mechanism of design reasoning from function to form is addressed by examining the possibility of explaining it as abduction. We propose a new interpretation to some definitions of innovative abduction, to show first that the concept, idea, as the basis for solution must be present in the inference, and second, that the reasoning from function to form is best modeled as a two-step inference, both of the innovative abduction pattern. This double-abductive reasoning is shown also to be the main form of reasoning in the empirically-derived “parameter analysis” method of conceptual design. Finally, the introduction of abduction into design theory is critically assessed, and in so doing, topics for future research are suggested.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Kroll E, Koskela L (2012) Interpreting parameter analysis through the prototheory of design. Proc. Int. Design Conf. (DESIGN 2012), Dubrovnik, May 21-24.
    • 2. Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.
    • 3. Dew N (2007) Abduction: a pre-condition for the intelligent design of strategy. Journal of Business Strategy 28(4):38-45.
    • 4. Roozenburg NFM (1993) On the pattern of reasoning in innovative design. Design Studies 14:4-18.
    • 5. Dorst K (2011) The core of 'design thinking' and its application. Design Studies 32:521-532.
    • 6. Ullman DG (1992) The mechanical design process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • 7. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhunsen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach. 3rd ed. London: Springer.
    • 8. Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • 9. Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies 25:373-391.
    • 10. Kroll E, Condoor SS, and Jansson DG (2001) Innovative conceptual design: theory and application of parameter analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 11. Kroll E (2013) Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis. Research in Engineering Design 24(2):165-183.
    • 12. Li YT (1976) Sensitive tiltmeter. US Patent 3,997,976.
    • 13. Peirce CS (1994) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Electronic edition. Volume 7: Science and Philosophy.
    • 14. Vickers J (2013) The problem of induction. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 edition), Zalta EN (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/induction-problem/.
    • 15. Schurz G (2008) Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164:201-234.
    • 16. March L (1976) The logic of design and the question of value. In March L (ed.) The architecture of form, pp. 1-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • 17. Roozenburg, NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product design: fundamentals and methods. Chapter 4. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    • 18. Goel V (1988) Complicating the 'logic of design'. Design Studies 9(4):229- 234.
    • 19. Takeda H, Veerkamp P, Tomiyama T, Yoshikawa H (1990) Modeling design processes. AI Magazine 11(4)37-48.
    • 20. Takeda H (1994) Abduction for design. In Gero JS, Tyugu E (eds.) Formal design methods for CAD, pp. 221-244. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • 21. Tomiyama T, Takeda H, Yoshioka M, Shimomura Y (2003) Abduction for creative design. Proc. ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conf. (DETC'03), pp. 543-552, Chicago, Sept. 2-6.
    • 22. Takeda H, Sasaki H, Nomaguchi Y, Yoshioka M, Shimomura Y, Tomiyama T (2003) Universal abduction studio-proposal of a design support environment for creative thinking in design. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED 03), Stockholm, Aug. 19-21.
    • 23. Zeng Y, Cheng GD (1991) On the logic of design. Design Studies 12:137- 141.
    • 24. Magnani L (1995) Creative processes in scientific discovery. European Journal for High Ability 6(2):160-169.
    • 25. Hoffman M (1999) Problems with Peirce's concept of abduction. Foundations of Science 4:271-305.
    • 26. Koskela L, Codinhoto R, Tzortzopoulos P, Kagioglou M (2014) The Aristotelian proto-theory of design. In Chakrabarti A, Blessing L (eds.) An anthology of theories and models of design. London: Springer.
    • 27. Hughes J (2009) Practical reasoning and engineering. In Meijers A (ed.) Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. A volume in Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, pp. 375-402. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • 28. Niiniluoto I (1999) Defending abduction. Philosophy of Science S436-S451.
    • 29. Wu X, Zhang C, Goldberg P, Cohen D, Pan Y, Arpin T, Bar-Yosef O (2012) Early pottery at 20,000 years ago in Xianrendong Cave, China. Science 336(6089):1696-1700.
    • 30. Ullah AMMS, Rashid MM, Tamaki J (2012) On some unique features of C-K theory of design. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 5: 55-66.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article