Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
James, David; Ferguson, Eamonn; Powis, David; Bore, Miles; Munro, Don; Symonds, Ian; Yates, Janet (2009)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Medical Education
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Special aspects of education, Education, Research article, Medicine(all), LC8-6691



At Nottingham University more than 95% of entrants to the traditional 5-year medical course are school leavers. Since 2003 we have admitted graduate entrants (GEM) to a shortened (4-year) course to 'widen access to students from more disadvantaged backgrounds'. We have recently shown that the GEM course widens academic and socio-demographic diversity of the medical student population. This study explored whether GEM students also bring psychological diversity and whether this could be beneficial.


We studied: a) 217 and 96 applicants to the Nottingham 5- and 4-year courses respectively, applying in the 2002-3 UCAS cycle, and, b) 246 school leavers starting the 5-year course and 39 graduate entrants to the 4-year course in October 2003. The psychological profiles of the two groups of applicants and two groups of entrants were compared using their performance in the Goldberg 'Big 5' Personality test, the Personal Qualities Assessment (PQA; measuring interpersonal traits and interpersonal values), and the Lovibond and Lovibond measure of depression, anxiety and stress. For the comparison of the Entrants we excluded the 33 school leavers and seven graduates who took the tests as Applicants.

Statistical analyses were undertaken using SPSS software (version 16.0).


Graduate applicants compared to school leaver applicants were significantly more conscientious, more confident, more self controlled, more communitarian in moral orientation and less anxious. Only one of these differences was preserved in the entrants with graduates being less anxious. However, the graduate entrants were significantly less empathetic and conscientious than the school leavers.


This study has shown that school leaver and graduate entrants to medical school differ in some psychological characteristics. However, if confirmed in other studies and if they were manifest in the extreme, not all the traits brought by graduates would be desirable for someone aiming for a medical career.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • The Future of Higher Education, White paper 2003 [http:// www.dfes.gov.uk/hegateway/uploads/White%20Pape.pdf]. accessed at Dec 2005 Guiding principles for the admission of medical students, CHMS [http://www.medschools.ac.uk/Publications/Pages/GuidingPrinciples-Medical-Students.aspx]. accessed at Dec 2005 Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L: Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002, 324:952-957.
    • James D, Ferguson E, Powis D, Symonds I, Yates J: Graduate entry to medicine: Widening academic and socio-economic access. Medical Education 2008, 42:294-300.
    • McCrae RR: The five-factor model and its assessment in clinical settings. Journal of Personality Assessment 1991, 57:399-414.
    • Costa PT, McCrae RR: Personality disorder and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality Disorder 1990, 4:362-371.
    • Widiger TA, Trull TJ: Personality and psychopathology: An application of te five-factor model. Journal of Personality 1992, 60:363-393.
    • Ferguson E, James D, O'Hehir F, Sanders A, McManus IC: Pilot study of the roles of personality, references and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree. BMJ 2003, 326:429-32.
    • 9. Coates H: Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test (GAMSAT). Medical Education 2008, 42:999-1006.
    • 10. Goldberg LR: The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psych Assess 1992, 4:26-42.
    • 11. Powis DA, Bore M, Munro D, Lumsden MA: Development of a psychological test battery as a tool for selecting medical students. Journal of Adult & Continuing Education 2005, 11:3-14.
    • 12. Lumsden MA, Bore M, Millar K, Jack R, Powis DA: (2005) Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school. Medical Education 2005, 39:258-265.
    • 13. Bore M, Munro D, Kerridge I, Powis D: Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation. Medical Education 2005, 39:266-275.
    • 14. Munro D, Bore M, Powis D: Personality factors in professional ethical behaviour: studies of empathy and narcissism. Australian Journal of Psychology 2005, 57:49-60.
    • 15. Guthrie EA, Black D, Shaw CM, Hamilton J, Creed FH, Tomenson B: Embarking upon a medical career: psychological morbidity in first year medical students. Medical Education 1995, 29:337-41.
    • 16. Stewart SM, Betson C, Marshall I, Wong CM, Lee PWH, Lam TH: Stress and vulnerability in medical students. Medical Education 1995, 29:119-127.
    • 17. Stewart SM, Lam TH, Betson CL, Wong CM, Wong AMP: A prospective analysis of stress and academic performance in the first two years of medical school. Medical Education 1999, 33:243-50.
    • 18. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH: The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1995, 33:335-43.
    • 19. Manuel RS, Borges NJ, Gerzina HA: Personality and clinical skills: any correlation? Academic Medicine 2005, 80:S30-3.
    • 20. Lievens F, Coetsier P, De Fruyt F, De Maeseneer J: Medical students' personality characteristics and academic performance: a five factor model perspective. Medical Education 2002, 36:1050-6.
    • 21. Petrides KV, McManus IC: Mapping medical careers: questionnaire assessment of career preferences in medical school applicants and final year students. BMC Medical Education 2004, 4:18.
    • 22. Stillwell NA, Wallick MM, Thai SE, Burleson JA: Myers-Briggs type and medical specialty choice: a new look at an old question. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2000, 12:14-20.
    • 23. Viswesvaran C, Ones DS: Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1999, 59:197-210.
    • 24. Roberts BW, DelVecchio WF: The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:3-25.
    • 25. Borghans L, Duckworth AL, Heckman JJ, ter Weel B: The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources 2008, 43:972-1059.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article