LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Macaskill, A. (2005)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

The lack of any consensual definition of forgiveness is a serious weakness in the research literature (McCullough, Pargament & Thoresen, 2000). As forgiveness is at the core of Christianity, this study returns to the Christian source of the concept to explore the meaning of forgiveness for practicing Christian clergy. Comparisons are made with a general population sample and social science definitions of forgiveness to ensure that a shared meaning of forgiveness is articulated. Anglican and Roman Catholic clergy (N = 209) and a general population sample (N = 159) completed a postal questionnaire about forgiveness. There is agreement on the existence of individual differences in forgiveness. Clergy and the general population perceive reconciliation as necessary for forgiveness while there is no consensus within psychology. The clergy suggests that forgiveness is limitless and that repentance is unnecessary while the general population suggests that there are limits and that repentance is necessary. Psychological definitions do not conceptualize repentance as necessary for forgiveness and the question of limits has not been addressed although within therapy the implicit assumption is that forgiveness is limitless.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Macaskill, A. (2002). Heal the hurt: How to forgive and move on. London: Sheldon Press.
    • Macaskill, A. & Maltby, J. (2002). Forgiveness of self and others and emotional empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 663-665.
    • Maltby, J., Macaskill, A. & Day, L. (2000). Failure to forgive self and others: a replication and extension of the relationship between forgiveness, personality, social desirability and general health. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 881-885.
    • Marty, M. E. (1998). The ethos of Christian forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.) Dimensions of forgiveness (pp139-161). Radnor, P A: Templeton Foundation Press.
    • Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage Publications.
    • Mauger, P.A., Perry, J.E., Freeman, T., Grove, D.C., McBride, A.G., & McKinney, K.E. (1992). The measurement of forgiveness: preliminary research. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 170-180.
    • McCullough, M.E. (2000). Forgiveness as human strength: Theory, measurement, and links to well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 43-55.
    • McCullough, M.E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1-14). New York: The Guilford Press.
    • McCullough, M .E. & Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141-1164.
    • McCullough, M.E., Worthington, E.L. & Rachal, K.C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.
    • McGary, H. (1989). Forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 26, 343-351.
    • Miles, J. & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying regression and correlation. London: Sage.
    • North, J. (1987). Wrongdoing and forgiveness. Philosophy, 61, 499-508.
    • Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and responses to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219-227.
    • O'Malley, M.N., & Greenberg, J. (1983). Sex differences in restoring justice: The down payment effect. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 174-185.
    • Pargament, K. I., & Rye, M. S. (1998). Forgiveness as a method of religious coping. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.) Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 139-161). Radnor, P A: Templeton Foundation Press.
    • QUALIS Research (1998). The ethnograph V 5.0: A user's guide. Thousand Oaks: Scolari, Sage Publications.
    • Rye, M. S., Pargament, K., Ali, M.A., Beck, G.L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., Narayanan, V., and Williams, J. G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (p18). New York: The Guilford Press.
    • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmuhalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
    • Snyder, C.R. & Yamhure, L.C. (1998). Heartland forgiveness scale. University of Kansas: Heartland Forgiveness Project.
    • Stuckless, N., & Goranson, R. (1992). The vengeance scale: Development of a measure of attitudes towards revenge. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 7, 25-42.
    • Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, S., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., & Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescent and middle adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641-655.
    • Tabachnick, G. & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. (3rd ed.) New York: Harper Collins.
    • Takaku, S., Weiner, B., & Ohbuchi, K.(2001). A cross-cultural examination of the effects of apology and perspective taking on forgiveness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 144-166.
    • Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidnas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281-312.
    • Worthington, E. L. Jr. (1998). Empirical research in forgiveness: Looking backward, looking forward. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.) Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 321-339). Radnor, P A: Templeton Foundation Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article