Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Johnson, A.J.; Goodman, S. (2013)
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper addresses the talk of the leader of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, when he spoke on the BBC following a surge in electoral success for the party. Inclusion in these programmes demonstrated political progress for the BNP, yet ironically facilitated breadth of criticism for the party, as his appearances were met with widespread hostility and accusations of extremism. Reactive rhetoric to these criticisms is central to Griffin rebranding the party and becoming part of mainstream UK politics. Discourse analysis is used to explore how Griffin responds to such criticism during two radio programmes and one television programme between 2009 and 2010. The analysis shows how Griffin uses two interconnected strategies of (1) presenting British people as the victims, rather than the perpetrators, of racism, and (2) blaming this racism not on outside groups, but on an ill-defined 'ruling elite'. These strategies are not independent of one another and function in response to criticism to present Griffin and the BNP as not racist aggressors but respondents to anti-white racism. The implications of this strategy for the presentation and attempted rebranding of the BNP, alongside other far right and mainstream parties, are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Antaki, C. & Leudar, I. 2001. Recruiting the Record: Using Opponents' Exact Words in Parliamentary Argumentation. Text. 21(4), 467-488.
    • Atton C. 2006. Far-right media on the internet: culture, discourse and power. New Media Society. 8(4), 573-587.
    • Leudar, I., Marsland, V. & Nekvapil, J. 2004. On Membership Categorisation: 'Us', 'Them' and 'Doing Violence' in Political Discourse. Discourse Soc. 15(2-3), 243- 266.
    • Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology, Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London, Sage.
    • Renton, D. 2005. 'A day to make history'? The 2004 elections and the British National Party. Patterns Prejudice. 39(1), 25-45.
    • Rhodes, J. 2011. 'It's not just them, it's whites as well': Whiteness, class and BNP support. Sociology. 45(1), 102-117.
    • Rhodes, J. 2009. The political breakthrough of the BNP: The case of Burnley. British Politics. 4(1), 22-46.
    • Rooyackers I.N. & Verkuyten M. 2012. Mobilizing support for the extreme right: A discursive analysis of minority leadership. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 51, 130-148.
    • Treadwell, J. 2012. White riot: the English Defence League and the 2011 English Riots. Criminal Justice Matters. 87(1), 36-37.
    • van der Valk, I. 2003. Right-Wing Parliamentary Discourse on Immigration in France. Discourse Soc. 14(3), 309-348.
    • van Dijk, T.A. 1993. Denying Racism: Elite Discourse and Racism. In J. Solomos & J. Wrench (eds.) Racism and Migration in Western Europe. (pp. 179-193). Oxford: Berg.
    • Verkuyten, M. 2012. Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out-group ideology and the five-social identity model. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02081.x 6.1.2 Other Online Sources
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article