LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Nobes, Gavin; Moore, Derek G.; Martin, Alan E.; Clifford, Brian R.; Butterworth, George; Panagiotaki, Georgia; Siegal, Michael (2003)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Children’s understanding of properties of the earth was investigated by interviewing Asian and white British classmates aged 4 - 8 years (N = 167). Two issues were explored: whether they held mental models of the earth (Vosniadou & Brewer, 1992) or instead had fragmented knowledge (di Sessa, 1988); and the influence of the children’s different cultural backgrounds. Children selected from a set of plastic models and answered forced choice questions. Using this methodology, there were no significant differences in the overall performance of Asian and white children after language skills were partialled out. Even young children showed an emerging knowledge of some properties of the earth, but the distributions of their combinations of responses provided no evidence that they had mental models. Instead, these distributions closely resembled those that would be expected if children’s knowledge in this domain were fragmented. Possible reasons for the differences between these findings and those of previous research are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (1994). The development of children's ability to use spatial representations. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development, Vol. 25 (pp. 157-199). San Diego: Academic press.
    • Brewer, W.F., Hendrich, D.J., & Vosniadou, S. (1987). A cross-cultural study of children's development of cosmological models: Samoan and American data. Third International Conference on Thinking, Honolulu, HI.
    • Butterworth, G., Siegal, M., Newcombe, P.A., & Dorfmann, M. (2001). Models and methodology in children's cosmology. Submitted for publication.
    • Diakidoy, I.A., & Kendou, P. (2001). Facilitating conceptual change in astronomy: a comparison of the effectiveness of two instructional approaches. Learning and Instruction, 11, 1-20.
    • Diakidoy, I.A., Vosniadou, S., & Hawks, J.D. (1997). Conceptual change in astronomy: Models of the earth and of the day/night cycle in American-Indian children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 159-184.
    • di Sessa, A.A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman and P.B. Pufall (eds.) Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, L.M. (1982) The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson Publishing.
    • Ingram, N., & Butterworth, G. (1989). The young child's representation of depth in drawing: Process and product. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 356- 369.
    • Martin, A., Clifford, B., Moore, D., & Nobes, G. (2001). Testing the consistency of children's understanding of the earth. Paper presented to the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Fribourg, Switzerland, September 2001.
    • Martin, A., Moore, D.M., Clifford, B.R., & Nobes, G. (2001). Exploring children's knowledge of the shape of the earth: A comparison of methods. Manuscript in preparation.
    • Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J.D. (1976). An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education, 60, 535-550.
    • Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1996). Mental models of the earth, sun, and moon: Indian children's cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11, 491-521.
    • Schoultz, J., Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103-118.
    • Siegal, M. (1997). Knowing children: Experiments in conversation and cognition. Second edition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
    • Siegal, M. (1999). Language and thought: the fundamental significance of conversational awareness for cognitive development. Developmental Science, 2, 1-14.
    • Siegal, M., Waters, L. J., & Dinwiddy, L. S. (1988). Misleading children: Causal attributions for inconsistency under repeated questioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 438-456.
    • Sneider, C., & Pulos, S. (1983). Children's cosmographies: Understanding the earth's shape and gravity. Science Education, 67, 205-221.
    • Vosniadou, S. (1994). Universal and culture-specific properties of children's mental models of the earth. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. (pp. 412-430). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Vosniadou, S. (1996). Fostering conceptual change in the physical sciences. International Journal of Psychology, 31, 2811-2820.
    • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1989). A cross-cultural investigation of children's conceptions about the Earth, the sun, and the moon: Greek and American data. In H. Mandl, E. DeCorte, N. Bennett, & H. F. Friedrich. Learning and instruction: European research in an international context, vol. 2.2, (pp. 605-629). Oxford: Pergamon.
    • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the Earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-586.
    • Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183.
    • 1. Gujarat is a state in western India. 'White' refers here to people of European origin.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article