LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wills, W.J.; Meah, A.; Dickinson, A.M.; Short, F. (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Appetite
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Psychology(all), Nutrition and Dietetics
Food stored, prepared, cooked and eaten at home contributes to foodborne disease which, globally, presents a significant public health burden. The aim of the study reported here was to investigate, analyse and interpret domestic kitchen practices in order to provide fresh insight about how the domestic setting might influence food safety. Using current theories of practice meant the research, which drew on qualitative and ethnographic methods, could investigate people and material things in the domestic kitchen setting whilst taking account of people's actions, values, experiences and beliefs. Data from 20 UK households revealed the extent to which kitchens are used for a range of non-food related activities and the ways that foodwork extends beyond the boundaries of the kitchen. The youngest children, the oldest adults and the family pets all had agency in the kitchen, which has implications for preventing foodborne disease. What was observed, filmed and photographed was not a single practice but a series of entangled encounters and actions embedded and repeated, often inconsistently, by the individuals involved. Households derived logics and principles about foodwork that represented rules of thumb about 'how things are done' that included using the senses and experiential knowledge when judging whether food is safe to eat. Overall, food safety was subsumed within the practice of 'being' a household and living everyday life in the kitchen. Current theories of practice are an effective way of understanding foodborne disease and offer a novel approach to exploring food safety in the home.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ACMSF. (2009). Final report on the increased incidence of listeriosis in the UK. Presented to the ACMSF and FSA on 14th September 2009. Available from http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/committee/acmsflisteria.pdf.
    • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    • Boyce, J. M., & Shone, G. R. (2006). Effects of ageing on smell and taste. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82(966), 239-241.
    • Brannen, J. (2005). Mixing methods. The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), 173-184.
    • Brennan, M., McCarthy, M., & Ritson, C. (2007). Why consumers deviate from best practice food safety advice? The case of 'high risk' consumers on the island of Ireland. Appetite, 49, 405-418.
    • Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories. A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255-280.
    • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
    • Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Dickinson, A., Wills, W. J., Meah, A., & Short, F. (2014). Food safety and older people. The Kitchen Life study. British Journal of Community Nursing, 19(5), 226-232.
    • Draper, A. K., Adamson, A. J., Clegg, S., Malam, S., Rigg, M., & Duncan, S. (2011). Front-of-pack nutrition labelling. Are multiple formats a problem for consumers? The European Journal of Public Health, 23, 517-521. 10.1093/eurpub/ckr144.
    • Evans, D. (2012). Beyond the throwaway society. Ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste. Sociology, 46(1), 41-56.
    • Eves, A., Bielby, G., Egan, B., Lumbers, M., Raats, M., & Adams, M. (2006). Food hygiene knowledge and self-reported behaviours of UK school children (4-14 years). British Food Journal, 108(9), 706-720.
    • Food Standards Agency. (2006). 4C's strategy. Promoting food hygiene in the home with a particular focus on working with schools and promoting local initiatives. London: Food Standards Agency.
    • Food Standards Agency. (2011). The FSA foodborne disease strategy 2010-15 (England). London: Food Standards Agency.
    • Food Standards Agency. (2013). Annual report of the chief scientist 2012/13. London: Food Standards Agency.
    • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
    • Greenstreet Berman. (2011). Food safety behaviours in the home. Final report for the food standards agency. London: Food Standards Agency.
    • Griffith, C. J., Worsfold, D., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Food preparation, risk communication and the consumer. Food Control, 9(4), 225-232.
    • Halkier, B., & Jensen, I. (2011). Methodological challenges in using practice theory in consumption research. Examples from a study on handling nutritional contestations of food consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 101-123.
    • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography. Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
    • Hernandez, M., & Sutton, D. (2003). Hands that remember. An ethnographic approach to everyday cooking. Expedition, 45(2), 30-37.
    • Ison, N. L. (2009). Having their say. Email interviews for research data collection with people who have verbal communication impairment. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(2), 161-172.
    • Keyes, K. M., Utz, R. L., Robinson, W., & Li, G. (2010). What is a cohort effect? Comparison of three statistical methods for modeling cohort effects in obesity prevalence in the United States, 1971-2006. Social Science & Medicine, 70(7), 1100-1108.
    • Kuchenm├╝ller, T., Hird, S., Stein, C., Kramarz, P., Nanda, A., & Havelaar, A. H. (2009). Estimating the global burden of foodborne diseases. A collaborative effort. Euro Surveillance, 14(18).
    • Martens, L. (2012). The politics and practices of looking. CCTV video and domestic kitchen practices. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in visual methodology. London: Sage.
    • Martens, L., & Scott, S. (2004). Domestic kitchen practices. Routines, risks and reflexivity. End of award report. Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council.
    • Meah, A. (2014). Still blaming the consumer? Geographies of responsibility in domestic food safety practices. Critical Public Health, 24(1), 88-103.
    • Meah, A., & Watson, M. (2011). Saints and slackers. Challenging discourses about the decline of domestic cooking. Sociological Research Online, 6(2).
    • Meah, A., & Watson, M. (2013). Cooking up consumer anxieties about 'provenance' and 'ethics'. Why it sometimes matters where foods come from in domestic provisioning. Food, Culture and Society, 16(3), 495-512.
    • Milne, R. (2011). A focus group study of food safety practices in relation to listeriosis among the over-60s. Critical Public Health, 21(4), 485-495.
    • Monrouxe, L. V. (2009). Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research. A view from inside. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 81-101.
    • Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., et al. (2006). Triangulation and integration. Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45-59.
    • Muir, S., & Mason, J. (2012). Capturing Christmas. The sensory potential of data from participant produced video. Sociological Research Online, 17(1), 5.
    • O'Connell, R. (2012). The use of visual methods with children in a mixed methods study of family food practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.647517.
    • Painter, J., Hoekstra, R., Ayers, T., Tauxe, R., Braden, C., Angulo, F., et al. (2013). Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998-2008. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 19(3), 407-415.
    • Paterson, B. L., Bottorff, J. L., & Hewat, R. (2003). Blending observation methods. Possibilities, strategies and challenges. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1).
    • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Pink, S. (2004). Applied visual anthropology social intervention, visual methodologies and anthropology theory. Visual Anthropology Review, 20(1), 3-16.
    • Power, E. (2003). De-centering the text. Exploring the potential for visual methods in the sociology of food. Journal for the Study of Food and Society, 6(2), 9-20.
    • Prior, G., Hall, L., Morris, S., & Draper, A. (2011). Exploring food attitudes and behaviours. In the UK findings from the Food and You Survey 2010. London: Food Standards Agency.
    • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices. A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.
    • Redmond, E. C., Griffith, C. J., Slader, J., & Humphrey, T. (2004). Microbiological and observational analysis of cross contamination risks during domestic food preparation. British Food Journal, 10(6), 581-597.
    • Schatzki, T. (2006). The time of activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39, 155-182.
    • Schatzki, T. (2011). Theories of practice. In D. Southerton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consumer culture (Vol. III, pp. 1447-1551). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, R., & Von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
    • Scott, E. (1997). Food borne disease and other hygiene issues in the home. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 80(1), 5-9.
    • Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
    • Shackley, S., & Wynne, B. (1995). Integrating knowledges for climate change. Pyramids, nets and uncertainties. Global Environmental Change, 5(2), 113-126.
    • Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
    • Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., & Ingram, J. (2007). The design of everyday life. London: Berg.
    • Southerton, D. (2013). Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption. From individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time and Society, 22(3), 335-355.
    • Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sutton, D. (2009). The mindful kitchen, the embodied cook. Tools, technology and knowledge transmission on a Greek island. Material Culture Review, 70, 63-68.
    • Sweetman, P. (2009). Revealing habitus, illuminating practice. Bourdieu, photography and visual methods. Sociological Review, 57(3), 491.
    • Terpstra, M. J., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., deMaertelaere, N. C. M., & Nijhuis, S. (2005). Food storage and disposal. Consumer practices and knowledge. British Food Journal, 107(7), 526-533.
    • Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131-153.
    • Watson, M., & Meah, A. (2013). Food, waste and safety. Negotiating conflicting social anxieties into the practices of domestic provisioning. Sociological Review, 60(S2), 98-116.
    • Wills, W. J. (2012). Using spoken and written qualitative methods to explore children and young people's food and eating practices. Sociological Research Online, 17(3), 16.
    • Wills, W. J., Backett-Milburn, K., Gregory, S., & Lawton, J. (2008). 'If the food looks dodgy I dinnae eat it'. Teenagers' accounts of food and eating practices in socio-economically disadvantaged families. Sociological Research Online, 13(1), 15.
    • Wills, W. J., Backett-Milburn, K., Roberts, E. M., & Lawton, J. (2011). The framing of class-based identities through family food and eating practices. Sociological Review, 59(3), 725-740.
    • Worsfold, D., & Griffith, C. J. (1997). Food safety behaviour in the home. British Food Journal, 99(3), 97-104.
    • Wynne, B. (1992). Uncertainty and environmental learning. Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2(2), 111-127.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    45
    45%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok