LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Eriksson, L. E.; Fritzell, K.; Rixon, L.; Björk, J.; Wettergren, L. (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC0254, RC0321

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: congenital, hereditary, and neonatal diseases and abnormalities, digestive system diseases, neoplasms
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/pon.3997
Objective\ud The aim of the study was to examine patients' beliefs about having familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), a hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, and how these beliefs are associated with adherence to endoscopic surveillance.\ud \ud Methods\ud Adult patients diagnosed with FAP on the national Swedish polyposis register who had undergone prophylactic colorectal surgery (n 209, response rate 76%) completed the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the relationships between illness perceptions and adherence, when controlling for demographic and clinical factors.\ud \ud Results\ud FAP was less distressing in men and those with fewer symptoms, reporting less serious consequences and more coherent understanding of FAP. Non-adherence (14%) to surveillance was associated with being older, having undergone surgery less recently and no history of malignancy. Patients' beliefs about their FAP were able to explain unique variance in non-adherence, in particular those who believed FAP was less distressing.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud Patients who were non-adherent to endoscopic surveillance had more positive perceptions about their FAP and, in particular, were less emotionally affected compared to those who adhered. As non-adherence implies a greater risk of future malignancies, special efforts are required to effectively prevent cancer in all patients with FAP. Those who have lived with the condition for a long time, and are not troubled by gastrointestinal symptoms or worried about their FAP, may be in need of specific information and support. Further prospective research is required to examine emotional predictors and consequences of non-adherence.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • R2=.094, R chg=.112, F=6.283, p<.001 R2=.056, R chg = .074, F=3.989, p=.004 R2=.089, R chg = .042, F=4.695, p=.010 R2=.076, R chg = .005, F=.296, p=.880
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article