Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Olivola, Christopher Y; Shafir, Eldar (2011)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Journal: Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: prosocial behavior, fundraising, BF, martyrdom effect, self-sacrifice, charity, Research Articles
Most theories of motivation and behavior (and lay intuitions alike) consider pain and effort to be deterrents. In contrast to this widely held view, we provide evidence that the prospect of enduring pain and exerting effort for a prosocial cause can promote contributions to the cause. Specifically, we show that willingness to contribute to a charitable or collective cause increases when the contribution process is expected to be painful and effortful rather than easy and enjoyable. Across five experiments, we document this “martyrdom effect,” show that the observed patterns defy standard economic and psychological accounts, and identify a mediator and moderator of the effect. Experiment 1 showed that people are willing to donate more to charity when they anticipate having to suffer to raise money. Experiment 2 extended these findings to a non-charity laboratory context that involved real money and actual pain. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the martyrdom effect is not the result of an attribute substitution strategy (whereby people use the amount of pain and effort involved in fundraising to determine donation worthiness). Experiment 4 showed that perceptions of meaningfulness partially mediate the martyrdom effect. Finally, Experiment 5 demonstrated that the nature of the prosocial cause moderates the martyrdom effect: the effect is strongest for causes associated with human suffering. We propose that anticipated pain and effort lead people to ascribe greater meaning to their contributions and to the experience of contributing, thereby motivating higher prosocial contributions. We conclude by considering some implications of this puzzling phenomenon. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ariely, D., Kamenica, E., & Prelec, D. (2008). Man's search for meaning: The case of Legos. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 671-677.
    • Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181.
    • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    • Barry, P. (2006, November 29). Glass act! Surrey & Hants Star. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.shstar.co.uk/
    • Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385-409.
    • Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.
    • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489-520.
    • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96, 1652-1678.
    • Berns, G. (2005). Satisfaction: The science of finding true fulfillment. New York: Henry Holt.
    • Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books (Originally published, 1781).
    • Birks, B. (2006, October 25). Sedgley firewalk. BBC Black Country. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/ blackcountry/
    • Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Cormack, M. (Ed.). (2002). Sacrificing the self: Perspectives on martyrdom and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Cryder, C., & Loewenstein, G. (2010). The critical link between tangibility and generosity. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 237-251). New York: Taylor and Francis.
    • Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2010). Affective motivations to help others: A two- stage model of donation decisions. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 161-178). New York: Taylor and Francis.
    • Fenster, T. (2011, February 17). Polar plungers freeze for fundraiser. The Stylus. Retrieved February 25, 2011, from http://www. thestylus.net/
    • Fields, R. M. (2004). Martyrdom: The psychology, theology, and politics of self-sacrifice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Firewalkers blaze a trail for charity. (2004, October 21). Haverhill Weekly News. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www. haverhill-news.com
    • Gardiner, R. (2007, July 16). Discovering how lucky we are. Times Online. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://www.times.co.nz/
    • Glucklich, A. (2001). Sacred pain: Hurting the body for the sake of the soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 1-18.
    • Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413.
    • Heath, C. (1999). On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 25-62.
    • Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346-380.
    • Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G, Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576-590.
    • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principals of behavior. New York: AppletonCentury-Croft.
    • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401-405.
    • Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., Tindale, R. S., & Smith, C. M. (2002). Social sharing and risk reduction: Exploring a computational algorithm for the psychology of windfall gains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 11-33.
    • Kaufman, B. E. (1999). Exploring the behavioral foundations of labor economics. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 361-392.
    • Kenderdine, A. (2011, February 4). Polar plunge at Lake Anne. The Washington Post. Retrieved February 25, 2011, from http:// www.washingtonpost.com/
    • Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Lane, R. E. (1992). Work as “disutility” and money as “happiness”: Cultural origins of a basic market error. Journal of SocioEconomics, 21, 43-64.
    • Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel, & A. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111-194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Lewin, S. B. (1996). Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1293-1323.
    • Lewis, M. (1965). Psychological effect of effort. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 183-190.
    • Liu, W. (2010). The benefits of asking for time. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 201-214). New York: Taylor and Francis.
    • Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 543-557.
    • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goalsetting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265-268.
    • Loewenstein, G. (1999). Because it is there: The challenge of mountaineering. . . for utility theory. Kyklos, 52, 315-344.
    • Loewenstein, G., & Issacharoff, S. (1994). Source dependence in the valuation of objects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 157-168.
    • Medin, D. L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Broadening behavioral decision research: Multiple levels of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 533-546.
    • Medin, D. L., Schwartz, H. C., Blok, S. V., & Birnbaum, L. A. (1999). The semantic side of decision-making. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 562-569.
    • Olivola, C. Y., & Shafir, E. (2011). Blood, sweat, and cheers: The martyrdom effect extended to others. Unpublished manuscript, University of Warwick.
    • Oppenheimer, D. M., & Olivola, C. Y. (Eds.). (2010). The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity. New York: Taylor and Francis.
    • Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2008, June). Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 4, 2008, from http://dictionary.oed.com/
    • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
    • Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Pub-goers walk on fire for charity. (2002, December 6). BBC News. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://news.bbc.co.uk
    • Reimers, S. (2009). A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation. Judgment and Decisionmaking, 4, 461-466.
    • Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaptation and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 109-133). New York: Russell Sage.
    • Russell, A. (2004, October 18). Students hungry to help. The Age. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://www.theage.com.au/
    • Shafir, E. (1995). Compatibility in cognition and decision. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Decision making from the perspective of cognitive psychology (The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 32) (pp. 247-274). New York: Academic Press.
    • Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 5-27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Small, D. A. (2010). Sympathy biases and sympathy appeals: Reducing social distance to boost charitable contributions. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 149-160). New York: Taylor and Francis.
    • Smith, M. E. (2003). The Aztecs (Second ed.). Cornwall: Blackwell.
    • Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Symonds, W. C. (2005, September 19). Sweating for dollars. Business Week. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www. businessweek.com
    • Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28, 571-586.
    • Trope, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 493-506.
    • von Baeyer, C. L., Piira, T., Chambers, C. T., Trapanotto, M., & Zeltzer, L. K. (2005). Guidelines for the cold pressor task as an experimental pain stimulus for use with children. The Journal of Pain, 6, 218-227.
    • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Brown, Z. (1966). Choosing to suffer as a consequence of expecting to suffer: An unexpected finding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 400-406.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article