LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
McAvoy, Siriol
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: PN
This thesis starts from the premise that medievalism is an important yet under-recognised seam in British modernist culture. Untangling and examining the medieval threads that weave throughout the modern interest in the new, I supply an important link in the chain connecting modernism to postmodernism. Specifically, I consider medievalism through the lens of gender. Suggesting that women’s prolific engagement with medieval culture during the modernist period has been mysteriously neglected, I illuminate modernist women writers’ creative engagement with the Middle Ages by focusing on two writers in particular – Virginia Woolf (1882-1941) and Lynette Roberts (1909-1995). By means of historicist cultural analysis and close reading, I show that the Middle Ages emerge in their work as an important imaginative structure for thinking about questions of war, gender, and national identity.\ud \ud My central argument is that Woolf’s and Roberts’s representations of medieval culture are strongly implicated in their wider reassessment of national identity and women’s relation to national tradition in the first part of the twentieth century. Re-visioning the Middle Ages from a new angle, Woolf and Roberts recast the foundational myths on which the categories of gender and national identity were based. This project, as I see it, is twofold: recuperating a female-oriented past through a close attention to the ‘details of life’, and inventing a tradition for use in the present day. Returning to the Middle Ages, Roberts and Woolf salvage a ‘usable past’ with which to construct a new form of national culture for the future – one that admits women and ‘outsiders like ourselves’.\ud \ud There is a political, recuperative impulse behind my decision to pair Woolf, a modernist who is ubiquitous and canonical, with Roberts, a writer who, partly due to her gender and Welsh affiliations, remains an obscure and marginalized voice even today. Establishing a dialogue between Roberts’s ethnographic poetry and Woolf’s poetical prose, I use Roberts’s positioning on the cultural margins in order to attain new purchase on Woolf’s complex approaches to empire and national belonging. On the other hand, Woolf’s feminist polemics help to uncover the feminist components of Roberts’s cultural vision, indicating the ways in which her feminism intersects with her nationalist and socialist commitments.\ud \ud I show that, in spite of their cultural differences, Roberts and Woolf both use the medieval past in order to articulate those marginalised experiences, at once ‘travelling’ and ‘native’, that remain unassimilated to the colonial experience. While, for Roberts, the act of historical re-writing opens out the possibility for a new, postcolonial awakening for Wales, for Woolf, it provides the basis for reconceiving the nation on new ‘common ground’ for the postwar future.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Harrison, Jane, Ancient Art and Ritual (London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1913).
    • -----, Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908).
    • -----, Themis: A Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1927).
    • Hegeman, Susan, Patterns for America: Modernism and the Concept of Culture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999).
    • Heidegger, Martin, '…Poetically Man Dwells… (1951)', in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. by Albert Hofstadter (London and New York: Harper and Row, 1971).
    • Henderson, Mae, 'Borders, Boundaries and Frame(works)', in Borders, Boundaries and Frames, ed. by Mae Henderson (New York and London: Routledge, 1995), pp. 1-30.
    • Henke, Suzette A., 'Mrs Dalloway: The Communion of Saints', in New Feminist Essays on Virginia Woolf, ed. by Jane Marcus (London and Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1981), pp. 125-47.
    • Hicks, D. Emily, Border Writing: The Multidimensional Text (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1991).
    • Highmore, Ben, Ordinary Lives: Studies in the Everyday (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011).
    • Hill, Katherine C., 'Virginia Woolf and Leslie Stephen: History and Literary Revolution', PMLA, 96.3 (1981), 351-62.
    • Hoberman, Ruth, Gendering Classicism: The Ancient World in Women's Twentieth Century Historical Fiction (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).
    • Howes, Laura L., Chaucer's Gardens and the Language of Convention (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1997).
    • Howkins, Alun, 'The Discovery of Rural England', in Englishness: Politics and Culture 1880-1920, ed. by Roberts Colls and Phillip Dodd (Breckenham, Kent: Croom Helm, 1986), pp. 62-88.
    • Hume, Kathryn, 'The Formal Nature of Middle English Romance', Philological Quarterly, 53, 2 (1974), 158-80.
    • Humphreys, Emyr, The Taliesin Tradition (Bridgend: Seren, 2002).
    • Ingman, Heather, 'Religion and the Occult in Modernist Women's Writing', in The Cambridge Companion to Modernist Women Writers, ed. by Maren Tova Linnett (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 187-202.
    • Irigaray, Luce, 'Divine Women', in Sexes and Genealogies, trans. By Gillian C. Gill (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993 [1987]), pp. 57-72.
    • -----, An Ethics of Sexual Difference, trans by Caroline Burke and Gillian C. Gill (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).
    • Lewis, C. S., 'De Descriptione Temporum: an Inaugural Lecture', Cambridge, 1955, in They Asked for a Paper (London: Geoffrey Bles, 1962), pp. 9-25.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article