Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Perkmann, Markus; King, Zella; Pavelin, Stephen (2011)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abramovsky, L., Harrison, R., Simpson, H., House, S., Bristol, B. S., 2007. University research and the location of business R&D. Economic Journal 117(519), C114-C141.
    • Abramovsky, L., Kremp, E., López, A., Schmidt, T., Simpson, H., 2004. Understanding co-operative R&D activity: evidence from four European countries. Institute of Fiscal Studies Working Paper 05/23, London.
    • Agrawal, A., Henderson, R. M., 2002. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science 48(1), 44-60.
    • Allen, T. J., 1977. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R & D organization. MIT Press, Cambridge.
    • Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., 1990. Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 55(4), 469-478.
    • Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., D'Este, P., 2008. When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies 45(8), 1424-1447.
    • Arundel, A., Geuna, A., 2004. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13(6), 559- 580.
    • Balconi, M., Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., 2004. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy 33(1), 127- 145.
    • Balconi, M., Laboranti, A., 2006. University-industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy 35(10), 1616-1630.
    • Baldini, N., 2008. Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence. Scientometrics 75(2), 289-311.
    • Becker, G. S., 1973. A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81(4), 813-846.
    • Behrens, T. R., Gray, D. O., 2001. Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy 30(2), 179-199.
    • Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., 2006. Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer 31(1), 175-188.
    • Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., 2008. Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science 19(1), 69-89.
    • Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., Louis, K. S., 1996. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine 335(23), 1734-1739.
    • Boyer, C. M., Lewis, D. R., 1984. Faculty consulting: Responsibility or promiscuity? Journal of Higher Education 55(5), 637-659.
    • Bozeman, B., Gaughan, M., 2007. Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry. Research Policy 36(5), 694-707.
    • Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., Montobbio, F., 2007. The scientific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from Italian data. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16(2), 101-118.
    • Calderini, M., Franzoni, C., Vezzulli, A., 2007. If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world. Research Policy 36(3), 303-319.
    • Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanikas, A., Vonortas, N. S., 2001. University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2), 153-161.
    • Carayol, N., 2003. Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy 32(6), 887-908.
    • Carayol, N., 2007. Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16(2), 119-138.
    • Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., Walsh, J. P., 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48(1), 1-23.
    • Coupé, T., 2003. Science is golden: Academic R&D and university patents. Journal of Technology Transfer 28(1), 31-46.
    • Crane, D., 1965. Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review 30(5), 699-714.
    • D'Este, P., Patel, P., 2007. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy 36(9), 1295-1313.
    • D'Este, P., Perkmann, M., 2010. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer (in press),
    • Di Gregorio, D., Shane, S., 2003. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy 32(2), 209-227.
    • Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29(2), 109-123.
    • Faulkner, W., Senker, J., 1994. Making sense of diversity: Public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy 23(6), 673-695.
    • Feller, I., 2005. A historical perspective on government-university partnerships to enhance entrepreneurship and economic development, in: S. Shane (Eds.), Economic development through entrepreneurship: Government, university and business linkages. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 6-28.
    • Geisler, E., 1995. Industry-university technology cooperation: A theory of interorganizational relationships. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7(2), 217-229.
    • Geuna, A., Nesta, L. J. J., 2006. University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy 35(6), 790-807.
    • Gibbons, M., 2000. Changing patterns of university - industry relations. Minerva 38(3), 352-361.
    • Gibbons, M., Johnston, R., 1974. The roles of science in technological innovation. Research Policy 3(3), 220-242.
    • Glaser, B., Bero, L., 2005. Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: A systematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics 11(4), 553-573.
    • Goldfarb, B., 2008. The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output. Research Policy 37(1), 41-58.
    • Gulati, R., 2007. Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal 50(4), 775- 782.
    • Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J. C., 2005. Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy 34(6), 932-950.
    • Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., Scott, J. T., 2001. Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the Advanced Technology Program. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1), 87-98.
    • HEFCE, 2006. Higher education-business and community interaction survey 2003-04. Higher Education Funding Council for England, London.
    • Hicks, D., 1995. Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial & Corporate Change 4(2), 401-424.
    • Howells, J., Nedeva, M., Georghiou, L., 1998. Industry-academic links in the UK. PREST, University of Manchester, Manchester
    • Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy 24(2), 185-205.
    • Kreiner, K., Schultz, M., 1993. Informal collaboration in R&D: the formation of networks across organizations. Organization Studies 14(2), 189-209.
    • Krimsky, S., 2003. Science in the private interest: has the lure of profits corrupted the virtue of biomedical research? Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
    • Lee, Y. S., 1996. 'Technology transfer' and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25(6), 843- 863.
    • Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987(3), 783-820.
    • Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., Bozeman, B., 2007. An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4), 641-655.
    • Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., Stoto, M. A., 1989. Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly 34(1), 110-131.
    • Lowe, R., Gonzalez-Brambila, C., 2007. Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. Journal of Technology Transfer 32(3), 173-194.
    • Mahdi, S., D'Este, P., Neely, A. D., 2008. Citation counts: Are they good predictors of RAE scores? A bibliometric analysis of RAE 2001. Working Paper, Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM), London.
    • Mansfield, E., 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20(1), 1-12.
    • Mansfield, E., 1995. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics 77(1), 55- 65.
    • Mansfield, E., Lee, J. Y., 1996. The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy 25(7), 1047-1058.
    • McGuinness, S., 2003. University quality and labour market outcomes. Applied Economics 35(18), 1943-1955.
    • McKelvey, B., 1997. Quasi-natural organization science. Organization Science 8(4), 352-380.
    • Merton, R. K., 1968. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810), 56-63.
    • Merton, R. K., 1973. The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, London, University of Chicago Press.
    • Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., 1990. Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica 58(6), 1255-1277.
    • Mindruta, D., 2008. Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim
    • Mortensen, D. T., 1988. Wages, separations, and job tenure: On-the-job specific training or matching? Journal of Labor Economics 6(4), 445-471.
    • Murray, F., Stern, S., 2007. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63(4), 648-687.
    • O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., Roche, F., 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy 34(7), 994-1009.
    • Oliver, C., 1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15(2), 241-265.
    • Roessner, J. D., 1993. What companies want from the Federal labs. Issues in Science and Technology 10(1), 37-42.
    • Romme, A. G. L., 2003. Making a difference: Organization as design. Organization Studies 14(5), 558-574.
    • Rosenberg, N., 1994. Exploring the black box: technology, economics, and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Rosenberg, N., Nelson, R. R., 1994. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23(3), 323-348.
    • Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S., Jiang, L., 2007. University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4), 691-791.
    • Sainsbury of Turville, L., 2007. The race to the top: A review of Government's science and technology policies HM Treasury
    • Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., Fröhlich, J., 2002. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31(3), 303-328.
    • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., Link, A. N., 2003. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 14, 111-133.
    • Siegel, D. S., Wright, M., Lockett, A., 2007. The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: Organizational and societal implications. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4), 489-504.
    • Simon, H. A., 1969. The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge.
    • Van De Ven, A. H., Johnson, P. E., 2006. Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review 31(4), 802-821.
    • Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., 2006. Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy 35(4), 596-608.
    • Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., Zimmermann, E., 2004. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy 33(3), 425-441.
    • Vincenti, W. G., 1990. What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article