Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lloyd, Cathy E.; Johnson, Mark R. D.; Mughal, Shanaz; Sturt, Jackie; Collins, Gary S.; Roy, Tapash; Bibi, Rukhsana; Barnett, A. H. (2008)
Publisher: Biomed central
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: R1
Background: Previous health research has often explicitly excluded individuals from minority\ud ethnic backgrounds due to perceived cultural and communication difficulties, including studies\ud where there might be language/literacy problems in obtaining informed consent. This study\ud addressed these difficulties by developing audio-recorded methods of obtaining informed consent\ud and recording data. This report outlines 1) our experiences with securing recruitment to a\ud qualitative study investigating alternative methods of data collection, and 2) the development of a\ud standardised process for obtaining informed consent from individuals from minority ethnic\ud backgrounds whose main language does not have an agreed written form.\ud Methods: Two researchers from South Asian backgrounds recruited adults with Type 2 diabetes\ud whose main language was spoken and not written, to attend a series of focus groups. A screening\ud tool was used at recruitment in order to assess literacy skills in potential participants. Informed\ud consent was obtained using audio-recordings of the patient information and recording patients'\ud verbal consent. Participants' perceptions of this method of obtaining consent were recorded.\ud Results: Recruitment rates were improved by using telephone compared to face-to-face methods.\ud The screening tool was found to be acceptable by all potential participants. Audio-recorded\ud methods of obtaining informed consent were easy to implement and accepted by all participants.\ud Attrition rates differed according to ethnic group. Snowballing techniques only partly improved\ud participation rates.\ud Conclusion: Audio-recorded methods of obtaining informed consent are an acceptable\ud alternative to written consent in study populations where literacy skills are variable. Further\ud exploration of issues relating to attrition is required, and a range of methods may be necessary in\ud order to maximise response and participation r

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article