LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jamson, SL; Hibberd, DL; Jamson, AH (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Whilst driving is inherently a safety-critical task, awareness of fuel-efficient driving techniques has gained popularity in both the public and commercial domains. Green driving, whether motivated by financial or environmental savings, has the potential to reduce the production of greenhouse gases by a significant amount. This paper focusses on the interaction between the driver and their vehicle – what type of eco-driving information is easy to use and learn whilst not compromising safety. A simulator study evaluated both visual and haptic eco-driving feedback systems in the context of hill driving. The ability of drivers to accurately follow the advice, as well as their propensity to prioritise it over safe driving was investigated. We found that any type of eco-driving advice improved performance and whilst continuous real-time visual feedback proved to be the most effective, this modality obviously reduces attention to the forward view and increases subjective workload. On the other hand, the haptic force system had little effect on reported workload, but was less effective that the visual system. A compromise may be a hybrid system that adapts to drivers’ performance on an on-going basis.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baddeley, A.D. (2006). Working memory: An overview. In S.L. Pickering (Ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 3 26). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Inc.
    • Barth, M. and Boriboonsomsin, K. (2009). Energy and Emissions Impacts of a Freeway Based Eco  Driving System. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(6), pp. 400–410.
    • Torfs, R. and Panis, L. I. (2009). Using on board logging devices to study the longer term impact of an eco driving course. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(7), pp. 514–520.
    • Birrell, S. A., Young, M. S. and Weldon, A. M. (2013). Vibrotactile pedals: provision of haptic feedback to support economical driving. Ergonomics, 56, pp. 282 292.
    • Deroo, M., Hoc, J M. and Mars, F. (2012). Influence of risk exception on haptically cued corrective manoeuvres during near lane departure. Ergonomics, 55, pp. 465 475.
    • Duncan, J., Williams, J. and Brown, I. (1991). Components of driving skill: experience does not mean expertise, Ergonomics, 34, pp. 919–937.
    • Engström, J., Johansson, E., and Östlund, J. (2005). Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8, pp. 97–120.
    • Fitts, P.M. and Posner, M.I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
    • Gonder, J., Earleywine, M. and Sparks, W. (2011). Final Report on the Fuel Saving Effectiveness of Various Driver Feedback Approaches. Milestone report for the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Task No. FC10.2700. Retrieved from: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/uploads/publication/Final_Report_on_the_Fuel_Saving_Effectiveness_ of_Various_Driver_Feedback_Approaches.pdf.
    • Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA Task Load Index (NASA TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting (pp. 904 908). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.
    • Hibberd, D.L., Jamson, S.L. and Carsten, O.M.J. (2013). Mitigating the effects of in vehicle distractions through use of the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm. Accident Analysis Prevention, 50, pp. 1096–1103.
    • Lee, J.D., Mcgehee, D.V., Brown, T. and Nakamoto, J. (2007), Driver sensitivity to brake pulse duration and magnitude. Ergonomics, 50, 828 836.
    • Merat, N. and Jamson, H. (2008). The effect of stimulus modality on signal detection: Implications for assessing the safety of in vehicle technology. Human Factors, (14), pp. 145 158.
    • Symmons, M. A., Rose, G. and Doorn, G. H. V.(2008). The effectiveness of an ecodrive course for heavy vehicle drivers,” in 2008 Australasian Road Safety Research Policing and Education Conference, no. November, Adelaide, Australia, 2008, pp. 187–194.
    • Trick, L.M., Enns, J.T., Mills, J., and Vavrik, J. (2004). Paying attention behind the wheel: A framework for studying the role of selective attention in driving. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5(5), 385 424.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article