Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Keraminiyage, Kaushal; Amaratunga, Dilanthi; Haigh, Richard
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: TH
Process improvement has been identified as one of the potential mechanisms to achieve the desired performance improvements within the UK construction industry. In addition, it has further been recognised the importance of learning construction process improvement lessons from other industry examples. Software industry has exemplified a successful implementation of a process improvement strategy, based on the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) which evaluate the capabilities and maturities of organisations in concern to establish the next level of process improvements needed. \ud This model consists of five maturity levels where level 1 being the least matured and level 5 being the most matured. After considering the close similarities between the software industry and the construction industry, the principles of software CMM were attempted to be applied within the construction industry, under the research project “Structured Process Improvement in Construction Enterprises (SPICE)”. Within this research the Key Process Areas (KPAs) of level 1, 2 and 3 of software CMM were evaluated and customised to the UK construction industry, after taking its unique characteristics into consideration. This leaves the software CMM level 4 and 5 KPAs unevaluated and un-customised, leaving the maximum potential of SPICE un-revealed. This paper aims at addressing this gap by reviewing the literature on construction process improvement and the software CMM to evaluate the applicability of software CMM higher capability maturity level KPAs within the UK construction context.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Dymond, M. (1995) A Guide to the CMM: Understanding the Capability Maturity Model for Software. Maryland: Process Inc US.
    • Egan, J. (1998) Rethinking Construction, Department of Environment. Transport and the Regions
    • Fairclough, J. (2002) Re thinking construction innovation and research: A review of
    • Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993) Re-engineering the Corporation: a Manifesto for Business Revolution. London: Brealey Publishing.
    • Hammer, M. (1990) Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, July/August, pp. 104-12.
    • Harrington, H. (1991) Improving Business Processes. TQM Magazine, February, pp. 39-44.
    • Healy, M. and Perry, C. (2000) Validity and Reliability of Qualitative Research Within the Realism Paradigm. Qualitative Research Journal: An International Journal, 3(3), pp. 118-126.
    • Holt, D. Love, D. and Nesan, F. (2000) Employee Empowerment in Construction: An Implementation Model for Process Improvement. Team performance Management: An International Journal, 6 (3/4), pp. 47-51.
    • Humphrey, W. and Sweet, W. (1987) A Method for Assessing the Software Engineering Capability of Contractors. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute.
    • Humphrey, W. (1989) Managing the Software Process. New York: Addison-Weslley publishing company Inc.
    • Jha, S. and Noori, H. Michela, J. (1996) The dynamics of continuous improvement, International Journal of Quality Science, 1(1), pp. 19-47.
    • Juran, J. (1991) Strategies for World-Class Quality. Quality Progress, March, pp. 81-5.
    • Kagioglou, M. Aouad, G. Cooper, R. and Hinks, J. (1999a) The Process Protocol: Process and IT modelling for the UK Construction Industry. IN: Amor R. (ed.) Product and Process Modelling in the Building Industry ,Proceedings of ECPPM'98, Building Research Establishment, Watford, 19- 21 Oct., Clowes Group, Beccles, Suffolk, UK, pp. 267-276.
    • Kagioglou, M. Cooper, R. and Aouad, G. (1999b) Re-Engineering the UK Construction Industry: The process protocol. IN: The Proceedings of Conference on Construction Process Re-engineering, University of South Wales, Sydney, Australia, pp. 317-327.
    • Kagioglou, M. Cooper, R. Aouad, G. Hinks, J. Sexton, M. and Sheath, D. (1998) Generic Design and Construction Process Protocol: final report, The University of Salford.
    • Koskela, L. Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (2003) Achieving Change in Construction. Virginia: International Group of Lean Construction.
    • Latham, M. (1994), Constructing the Team, HMSO.
    • Lillrank, P. (1995), The Transfer of Management Innovations from Japan. Organisation Studies, 16(6), pp. 971-89.
    • Love, D. and Li, H. (1998) From BPR to CPR - Conceptualising Re-Engineering in Construction. Business Process Management Journal, 4(4), pp. 291-305.
    • Love, D. Li, I. Irani, Z. and Li, H. (2000) Total Quality Management and the Learning Organisation: A Dialogue for Change in Construction. Construction Management and Economics, 18, pp. 321-331.
    • Love, P. and Gunasekaran, A. (1997) Concurrent Engineering in the Construction Industry. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications. 5(2), pp.155-162.
    • Lowe, D. & Cox G. (1996) Implementing the Capability Maturity Model for Software Development. Hewlett Packard Journal.
    • Mills, M. and Huberman, A. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book. CA: Thousand oaks.
    • Morton, M. (1991) The Corporation in the 1990's: Information Technology and Organisational Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • O'Conner, T. and Yang, L.(2004) Project Performance verses Use of Technologies at Project and Phase Levels. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(3), pp. 322-329.
    • Oakland, S. (1993) Total Quality Management. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    • Paulk, C. Weber, C. Garcia, S. Chrissis, B. and Bush, M. (1993) Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute.
    • Paulk, C. Weber, C. Garcia, S. Chrissis, B. and Bush, M. (1994) The Capability Maturity Model for Software. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute.
    • Paulk, C. Weber, C. Garcia, S. Chrissis, B. and Bush, M. (1995) The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process. Pittsburgh: Addision-Wesley.
    • Pheng, L. and Ke-Wei, P. (1996), A Framework for Implementing TQM in Construction. The TQM Magazine,8(5), pp. 39-46.
    • Raynus, J. (1999) Software Process Improvement with CMM. Norwood: Artech House Inc.
    • Samuelsson, P. (2003) Improvement Processes in Construction Companies IN: Atkin, B. Borgbrant, J. and Josephson, P. (eds.) Construction Process Improvement, Oxford: Blackwell Science ltd, pp. 225- 238.
    • Santos, A. and Powell, J. (2001) Assessing the Level of Teamwork in Brazilian and English Construction Sites. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(4), pp. 166-174.
    • Santos, A. Formoso, C. and Tookey, E. (2002) Expanding the Meaning of Standardisation within Construction Processes. The TQM Magazine, 14(1), pp. 25-33.
    • Sarshar, M. Finnemore, M. and Haigh, R (2000b) Introduction to SPICE. Construct I.T., University of Salford.
    • Sarshar, M. Haigh, R. Finnemore, M. Aouad, G. Barrett, P. Baldry, D. and Sexton, M. (2000a) SPICE: A Business Process Diagnostics Tool for Construction Projects. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 7(3), pp. 241-250.
    • Sarshar, M. Hutchinson, A. Aouad, G. Barrett, P. Minnikin, J. and Shelley, C. (1998) Standardised Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises (SPICE). IN: Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Product and Process Modelling, Watford.
    • Talwar, R. (1993) Business Re-Engineering - A Strategy-Driven Approach. Long Range Planning, 26(6), pp. 22-40.
    • Tanswell, A. (1993) Business Restructuring: The Key to Radical Change. Professional Engineering, 6(1), January, pp. 24-5.
    • Tinnila, M. (1995), Strategic Perspective to Business Process Redesign. Management Decision, 33(3), pp. 25-34.
    • Yin, R. K (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage publications.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article