LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lee, K; Sakellariou, R; Paton, NW; Fernandes, AAA (2007)
Publisher: ACM
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects:
The performance of long running scientific workflows stands to benefit from adapting to changes in their environment. Autonomic Computing provides methodologies for managing run-time adaptations in managed systems. In this paper, we apply the monitoring, analysis, planning and execution (MAPE) model from autonomic computing to support the runtime modification of workflows with the aim of improving their performance. We systematically identify run-time adaptations and indicate how such behaviours can be captured using the MAPE model from the Autonomic Computing community. By characterising these as autonomic computing problems we make a proposal about how workflow adaptation can be achieved.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] I. Altintas, C. Berkley, E. Jaeger, M. Jones, B. Ludscher, and S. Mock. Kepler: An extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows, 2004.
    • [2] A. Arasu, S. Babu, and J. Widom. The cql continuous query language: semantic foundations and query execution. The VLDB Journal, 15(2):121-142, 2006.
    • [3] D. Balasubramaniam, R. Morrison, G. Kirby, K. Mickan, B. Warboys, I. Robertson, B. Snowdon, R. M. Greenwood, and W. Seet. A software architecture approach for structuring autonomic systems. In DEAS '05: Proc 2005 Workshop on Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software, pages 1-7. ACM Press, 2005.
    • [4] P. Buhler, J. M. Vidal, and H. Verhagen. Adaptive workflow = web services + agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Services, pages 131-137. CSREA Press, 2003.
    • [5] F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi. Workflow evolution. In International Conference on Conceptual Modeling / the Entity Relationship Approach, pages 438-455, 1996.
    • [6] S. Chaudhuri, V. R. Narasayya, and R. Ramamurthy. Estimating progress of long running sql queries. In SIGMOD Conference, pages 803-814, 2004.
    • [7] D. Churches, G. Gombas, A. Harrison, J. Maassen, C. Robinson, M. Shields, I. Taylor, and I. Wang. Programming scientific and distributed workflow with triana services. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience, 18(10):1021-1037, 2006.
    • [8] E. Deelman, J. Blythe, Y. Gil, C. Kesselman, G. Metha, K. Vahi, K. Blackburn, A. Lazzarini, A. Arbree, R. Cavanaugh, and S. Koranda. Mapping abstract complex workflows onto grid environments. Journal of Grid Computing, 1(1):25-39, 2003.
    • [9] Y. Gil, E. Deelman, J. Blythe, C. Kesselman, and H. Tangmunarunkit. Artificial intelligence and grids: Workflow planning and beyond. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(1):26-33, 2004.
    • [10] A. Gounaris, J. Smith, N. W. Paton, R. Sakellariou, A. A. A. Fernandes, and P. Watson. Adapting to changing resource performance in grid query processing. In Data Management in Grids, pages 30-44. Springer, 2005.
    • [11] T. Heinis, C. Pautasso, and G. Alonso. Design and evaluation of an autonomic workflow engine. In Proc. ICAC, pages 27-38. IEEE Press, 2005.
    • [12] B. Jacob, R. Lanyon-Hogg, D. K. Nadgir, and A. F. Yassin. A Practical Guide to the IBM Autonomic Computing Toolkit. IBM Redbooks, 2004.
    • [13] J. O. Kephart and D. M. Chess. The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Computer, 36(1):41-50, 2003.
    • [14] M. Litoiu, M. Woodside, and T. Zheng. Hierarchical model-based autonomic control of software systems. In DEAS '05: Proc 2005 Workshop on Design and Evolution of Autonomic Application Software, pages 27-33. ACM Press, 2005.
    • [15] S. M. Sadjadi, P. K. McKinley, and B. H. C. Cheng. Transparent shaping of existing software to support pervasive and autonomic computing. In DEAS '05: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Design and evolution of autonomic application software, pages 1-7, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
    • [16] R. Sakellariou and H. Zhao. A low-cost rescheduling policy for efficient mapping of workflows on grid systems. Scientific Programming, 12(4):253-262, December 2004.
    • [17] H.-L. Truong, P. Brunner, T. Fahringer, F. Nerieri, R. Samborski, B. Balis, M. Bubak, and K. Rozkwitalski. K-wfgrid distributed monitoring and performance analysis services for workflows in the grid. In Proc. 2nd Intl Conf on e-Science and Grid Computing. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
    • [18] S. Vazhkudai, S. Tuecke, and I. Foster. Replica selection in the globus data grid. In CCGRID '01: Proc 1st International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, page 106. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article