Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wahab, S.H.A.; Ould-Khaoua, M.; Mackenzie, L.M. (2007)
Publisher: IEEE
Languages: English
Types: Other
Subjects: QA75, QA76
Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) have been proposed for a wide variety of applications, some of which require the support of real time and multimedia services. To do so, the network should be able to offer quality of service (QoS) appropriate for the latency and throughput bounds to meet appropriate real time constraints imposed by multimedia data. Due to the limited resources such as bandwidth in a wireless medium, flows need to be prioritised in order to guarantee QoS to the flows that need it. In this research, we propose a scheme to provide QoS guarantee to high priority flows in the presence of other high as well as low priority flows so that both type of flows achieve best possible throughput and end-to-end delays. Nodes independently monitor the level of interference by checking the rates of the highest priority flows and signal corrective mechanisms when these rates fall outside of specified thresholds. This research investigates using simulations the effects of a number of important parameters in MANETs, including node speed, pause time, interference, and the dynamic monitoring and correction on system performance in static and mobile scenarios. In this report we show that the dynamic monitoring and correction provides improved QoS than fixed monitoring and correction to both high priority and low priority flows in MANETs.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Throughput, 3hp:13lp, 20 m/s, pt 0, 5 topologies Delay, 3hp:13lp, 20 m/s, pt 0, 5 topologies [1]
    • [2] A. Servetti, M. Juan Carlos De (2005): "Variable timescale audio streaming over 802.11 inter-vehicular ad-hoc networks", In DSP-in-V-2005
    • [3] S. Kumar, V. S. Raghavan and J. Deng. Medium access control protocols for ad hoc wireless networks: a survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 4(3), pp. 326-358, May 2006.
    • fixed 60(0.7)
    • [4] E. Crawley, R. Nair, B. Rajagopalan, and H. Sandick. A framework for qos-based routing in the internet, in: IETF RFC2386, Work in progress, 1998.
    • [5] http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/
    • [6] C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer. Ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing. Proceedings 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 1999, pp. 90–100.
    • [7] D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz, Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks, in: T. Imielinski, H. Korth (Eds.), Mobile Computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 153–181.
    • [8] Z. J. Haas and M. R. Pearlman. The performance of query control schemes for the zone routing protocol. IEEE/ACM Transactions in Networking, 9(4): 427–438, 2001.
    • [9] S. -B. Lee, G. -S. Ahn, X. Zhang, and A. T. Campbell. Insignia: an ip-based quality of service framework for mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Parallel & Distributed Computing, 60(4):374–406, 2000.
    • [10] P. Stuedi, J. Xue and G. Alonso. Asap: an adaptive qos protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. PIMRC 2003, 3(7):2616– 2620, 2003.
    • [11] G. -S. Ahn, Andrew T. Campbell, A. Veres, and L. -H. Sun. Supporting service differentiation for real-time and best-effort traffic in stateless wireless ad hoc networks (swan). IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 1(3):192–207, 2002.
    • [12] G. -S. Ahn, A. T. Campbell, A. Veres and L. -H. Sun, SWAN: Service differentiation in stateless wireless ad hoc networks, Proc. IEEE INFOCOM'2002, New York, New York, June 2002.
    • [13] A. Veres, A. T. Campbell, M. Barry, and L. -H. Sun, Supporting service differentiation in wireless packet networks using distributed control, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, Special Issue on Mobility and Resource Management in Next-Generation Wireless Systems, 19(10), pp. 2094-2104, October 2001.
    • [14] Y. L. Morgan and T. Kunz. Enhancing swan QoS model by adopting destination-based regulation (E-Swan). WiOpt’04: Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, 2004.
    • [15] X. Hannan, C. K. Chaing and S. K. G. Winston, Quality of service models for ad hoc wireless networks, The handbook of ad hoc wireless networks, 2003, CRC Press, Inc. pp. 467- 482.
    • [16] X. Hannan, C. K. Chaing, W. Seah, A. Lo, On service prioritization in mobile ad-hoc networks, ICC 2001, no. 1, June 2001, pp. 1900-1904.
    • [17] H. Arora and L. Greenwald. Toward the use of local monitoring and network-wide correction to achieve QoS guarantees in mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE SECON 2004, 4-7 Oct. 2004, pp. 128 – 138.
    • [18] D. D. Perkins and H. D. Hughes. A survey on quality-ofservice support for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5):503–513, 2002.
    • [19] T. B. Reddy, I. Karthigeyan, B. S. Manoj, and C. S. R. Murthy. Quality of service provisioning in ad hoc wireless networks: a survey of issues and solutions. Ad Hoc Networks, 4(1), pp. 83-124, 2006.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article