LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lewis, Suzan; Roper, Ian (2008)
Publisher: Oxford U. P.
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects:
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 3 . T h e P s y c h o l o g i c a l C a s e f o r F l e x i b l e W o r k t o S u p p o r t G e n d e r E q u i t y a t W o r k
    • Allen, T. 2001. Family-supportive work environments: the role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 414-35.
    • Anderson, S., Coffey, B. S., and Byerly, R. T. 2002. Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: links to work-family conXict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28 (6): 787-810.
    • Bailyn, L. 1993. Breaking the Mold: Women, Men and Time in the New Corporate World. New York: Free Press.
    • -- 2006. Breaking the Mold: Redesigning Work for Productive and Satisfying Lives, 2nd edn. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
    • Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E, Huff, J. W, Wright, J. A., and Neuman, G. A. 1999. Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: a meta-analysis of their eVects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (4): 496-513.
    • Barnett, R. C., and Gareis, K. C. 2006. Antecedents and correlates of parental after-school concern: exploring a newly identiWed work-family stressor. American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 1382-400.
    • Barratt-Brown, M. 1995. Models in Political Economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Bellavia. G., and Frone, M. 2005. Work-family conXict. Pp. 113-47 in Handbook of Work Stress, ed. J. Barling, E. K. Kelloway, and M. Frone. London: Sage.
    • Bevan, S., Dench, S, Tamkin, P., and Cummings, J. 1999. Family Friendly Employment: The Business Case. London: DfEE Research Report RR136.
    • Blyton, P., and Turnbull, P. 2004. The Dynamics of Employee Relations. 3rd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    • Bond, S., Hyman, J. and Wise, S. 2002. Family Friendly Working? Putting Policy into Practice. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Bryce, J., and Haworth, J. 2003. Psychological well-being in a sample of male and female oYce workers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33 (3): 565-85.
    • Burchell , B., Lapido, D., and Wilkinson, F. 2001. Job Insecurity and Work IntensiWcation. London: Routledge.
    • Campbell Clark, S. 2000. Work/family border theory: a new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53 (6): 747-70.
    • Dex, S., and Schreibl , F. 2001. Flexible and family friendly working arrangements in SMEs: Business Case 2001. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38 (3): 411-31.
    • Dickens, L. 2007. The road is long: thirty years of equality legislation in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45 (3).
    • -- and Hall , M. 2006. Fairness-up to a point: assessing the impact of New Labor's employment legislation. Human Resource Management Journal, 16 (4): 338-56.
    • Dikkers, J., den Dulk, L., Geurts, S., and Peper, B. 2005. Work-nonwork culture, utilization of work-nonwork arrangements, and employee-related outcomes in two Dutch organizations. In Work and Family: An International Perspective, ed. S. A. Y. Poelmans. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    • Eriksson, R. 2005. Parental leave in Sweden: the eVects of the Second Daddy Month. Swedish Institute for Social Research Working Paper 9/2005, Stockholm University.
    • Evans, J. 2000. Firms' Contributions to the Reconciliation of Work and Family Life. Paris: OECD.
    • Fried, M. 1998. Taking Time: Parental Leave Policy and Corporate Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    • Friedman, S., and Greenhaus, J. 2000. Work and Family-Allies or Enemies? What Happens When Business Professionals Confront Life Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Frone, M. R., Russell , M., and Cooper, M. L. 1992. Antecedents and outcomes of workfamily conXict: testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (1): 65-78.
    • Gambles, R. Lewis, S., and Rapoport, R. 2006. The Myth of Work-Life Balance: The Challenge of our Time for Men, Women and Societies. Chichester: Wiley.
    • Green, F., and McIntosh, S. 2001. The intensiWcation of work in Europe. Labor Economics 8 (2): 291-308.
    • Goff, S. J., Mount, M. K., Jamison, R. L. 1990. Employer supported child care, work/ family conXict and absenteeism: a Weld study. Personnel Psychology, 43: 793-809.
    • Greenhaus, J. H., and Beutell , N. J. 1985. Sources and conXict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10 (1): 76-88.
    • -- and Parasuraman, S. 1999. Research on work, family and gender: current status and future directions. In Handbook of Gender and Work, ed. G. Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Greenhaus, J. H., and Powell, G. N. 2006. When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31: 72-92.
    • Guelzow, M. G., Bird, G. W., and Koball , E. H. 1991. An explanatory path analysis of the stress process for dual-career men and women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 5: 151-64.
    • Haas, L., Allard, K., Hwang, P. 2002. The impact of organizational culture on men's use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work and Family, 5: 319-42.
    • Hanson, G. C., Hammer , L. B, and Colton, C. L. 2006. Development and validation of a multidimensional scale of perceived work-family positive spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11: 249-65.
    • Haworth, J., and Lewis, S. 2005. Work, leisure and well-being. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 33 (1): 67-79.
    • Hochschild, A. 1997. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Henry Holt.
    • Hogarth, T., Hasluck , C., Pierre, G., Winterbotham, M., and Vivian, D. 2000. WorkLife Balance 2000: Baseline Study of Work-Life Balance Practices in Great Britain. London: DfEE.
    • Holt, H., and Thaulow, I. 1996. Formal and informal Xexibility in the workplace. In The Work Family Challenge: Rethinking Employment, ed. S. Lewis and J. Lewis. London: Sage.
    • Hyman, J., Baldry, C., Scholarios, D., and Bunzel , D. 2003. Work-life imbalance in call centers and software development. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41 (2): 215-39.
    • Irving, P., Steele, J., and Hall , N. 2005. Factors AVecting the Labor Force Participation of Older Workers. London: Department of Work and Pensions, Research Report 281.
    • Iso-Ahola, S. 1997. A psychological analysis of leisure and health. In Work, Leisure and Well Being, ed. J. T. Haworth. London: Routledge.
    • -- and Mantell , R. 1997. A psychological analysis of leisure and health. In Work, Leisure and Well Being, ed. J. T. Haworth. London: Routledge.
    • Jahn, E. W., Thompson, C. A., and Kopelman, R. E. 2003. Rationale and construct validity evidence for a measure of perceived organizational family support (POFS): because purported practices may not reXect reality. Community, Work and Family, 6: 123-40.
    • Judiesch, M., and Lyness, K. 1999. Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers' career success. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 641-51.
    • Kay, T. 2001. Leisure, gender and family: challenges for work-life integration. ESRC seminar series ''Wellbeing: situational and individual determinants'' 2001-2 Work, employment, leisure and wellbeing.
    • Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, J., and Oxenbridge, S. 2006. Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Routledge.
    • Kirton, J., and Green, A. 2000. The Dynamics of Managing Diversity. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
    • Kossek, E. E., and Ozeki, C. 1999. Bridging the work-family policy and productivity gap: a literature review. Community, Work and Family, 2(1): 7-32.
    • -- Colquitt, J. A., and Noe , J. A. 2001. Caregiving decisions, well-being, and performance: the eVects of place and provider as a function of dependent type and work-family climates. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1): 29-44.
    • Krausz , M., Sagie, A., and Biderman, Y. 2000. Actual and preferred work scheduling control as determinants of job related attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56: 1-11.
    • Lee, M., MacDermid, S., and Buck , M. 2000 Organizational paradigms of reduced load work; accommodations, elaboration and transformation. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (6): 1211-36.
    • Lerner , M. J. 1987. Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: implications for comparable worth. Social Justice Research, 1: 107-25.
    • Lewis, S. 1997. Family friendly policies: organisational change or playing about at the margins? Gender, Work and Organisations, 4: 13-23.
    • -- 2001. Restructuring workplace cultures: the ultimate work-family challenge? Women in Management Review, 16 (1): 21-9.
    • -- 2003a. The integration of work and personal life. Is post industrial work the new leisure? Leisure Studies, 22: 343-55.
    • -- 2003b. Flexible working arrangements: implementation, outcomes and management. In International Review of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, vol. xviii, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. Robertson. New York: Wiley.
    • -- and Cooper, C. L. 1987 Stress in two earner couples and stage in the life cycle. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60: 289-303.
    • -- -- 1996. Balancing the work family interface: a European perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 5: 289-305.
    • -- -- 1999. The work-family research agenda in changing contexts. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4 (4): 382-93.
    • -- -- 2005. Work-Life Integration: Case Studies of Organisational Change. New York: Wiley.
    • -- and Lewis, J. 1997. Work family conXict: can the law help? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2: 155-167.
    • -- and Haas, L. 2005. Work-life integration and social policy: a social justice theory and gender equity approach to work and family. In Work and Life Integration: Organisational, Cultural and Individual Perspectives, ed. E. Kossek and S. Lambert. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    • -- and Smithson, J. 2001. Sense of entitlement to support for the reconciliation of employment and family life. Human Relations, 55 (11): 1455-81.
    • -- -- 2006. Final Report of the Transitions Project for the EU Framework 5 funded study ''Gender, parenthood and the changing European workplace.'' Manchester: RIHSC, Manchester Metropolitan University.
    • -- Gambles, R., and Rapoport, R. 2007. The constraints of a work-life balance approach: an international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (3): 360-73.
    • -- Kagan, C., and Heaton, P. 2000. Dual earner parents with disabled children. Patterns for working and caring. Journal of Family Issues, 21 (8): 1031-60.
    • Liff, S., and Dickens, L. 2000. Ethics and equality: reconciling false dilemmas. In Ethical Issues in Contemporary Human Resource Management, ed. D. Winstanley and J. Woodall. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
    • MacDermid, S. 2005. (Re)considering conXict between work and family. In Work and Life Integration: Organisational, Cultural and Individual Perspectives, ed. E. Kossek and S. Lambert. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    • Major , B. 1993. Gender entitlement and the distribution of family labor. Journal of Social Issues, 493: 141-59.
    • Major, J. 1987. Gender, justice and the psychology of entitlement. Pp. 124-48 in Review of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. vii, ed. P. Shaver and C. Hendrick. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Maume , D., and Houston, P. 2001. Job segregation and gender diVerences in work-family spillover among white collar workers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22 (2): 171-89.
    • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., and Piitulainen, S. 2005. Work-family culture in four organizations in Finland: examining antecedents and outcomes. Community, Work and Family, 8: 115-41.
    • -- -- and Pyykk , M. 2005. Does work-family conXict mediate the relationship between work-family culture and self-reported distress? Evidence from Wve Finnish organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78: 509-31.
    • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., and Viswesvaran, C. 2006. How family-friendly work environments aVect work/family conXict: a meta-analytic examination. Journal of Labor Research, 27: 555.
    • O'Driscoll, M., Poelmans, S., Spector, P., Kalliath, T., Allen, T., Cooper, C., and Sanchez, J. 2003. Family-responsive interventions, perceived organizational and supervisor support, work-family conXict, and psychological strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 10 (4): 326-44.
    • OECD. 2004. Female Labor Force Participation: Past Trends and main Determinants in OECD Countries. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, May.
    • Perlow, L. A. 1995. Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organization Management, 20: 227-39.
    • -- 1998 Boundary control: the social ordering of work and family time in a high tech organisation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 328-57.
    • Pollert, A. 1991. The orthodoxy of Xexibility. In Farewell to Flexibility, ed. A. Pollert. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Rapoport, R. Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J., and Pruitt, B. 2002. Beyond Work-Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Work Performance. Chichester: Wiley.
    • Reichle, B. 1996. From is to ought and the kitchen sink: on the justice of distributions in close relationships. In Current Societal Concerns about Justice, ed. L. Montado and M. Lerner. Critical Issues in Social Justice. New York: Plenum.
    • Roper, I., Cunningham, I., and James, P. 2003. Promoting family-friendly policies: is the basis of the Government's ethical standpoint viable? Personnel Review, 32 (2): 211-32.
    • Sahibzada, K., Hammer, L. B., Neal , M. B., and Kuang, D. C. 2005. The moderating eVects of work-family role combinations and work-family organizational culture on the relationship between family-friendly workplace supports and job satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 26: 1-20.
    • Sayer, A. 2007. Moral economy and employment. Pp. 21-40 in Searching for the Human in Human Resource Management, ed. S. Bolton and M. Houlihan. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
    • Cartwright et al / The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Psychology 17-Cartwright and Cooper-chap17 Page Proof page 437 13.3.2008 11:51am Schein, E. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Smith, P. A., and Wedderburn, A. A. 1998. Flexibility and long shifts. Employee Relations, 20 (5): 483-9.
    • Soskice, D. 2005. Varieties of capitalism and cross-national gender diVerences. Social Politics, 12 (2): 170-9.
    • Sutton, K., and Noe, R. 2005. Family friendly programs and work-life integration: more myth than magic? In Work and Life Integration: Organizational, Cultural and Individual Perspectives, ed. E. Kossek and S. Lambert. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    • Tausig, M., and Fenwick, R. 2001. Unbinding time: alternate work schedules and worklife balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22 (2): 101-19.
    • Tetrick, L. E., and Buffardi, L. C. 2006. Measurement issues in research on the workhome interface. Pp. 90-114 in Work-Life Balance: A Psychological Perspective, ed. F. Jones, R. J. Burke, and M. Westman. Hove: Psychology Press.
    • Thomas, L. T., and Ganster, D. C. 1995. Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conXict and strain: a control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 6-15.
    • Thompson, C. A., and Prottas, D. J. 2006. Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11 (1): 100-18.
    • -- Beauvais, L. L., and Lyness, K. S. 1999. When work-family beneWts are not enough: the inXuence of work-family culture on beneWt utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conXict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54 (3): 392-415.
    • Townsend, A., Maline, L., and Druley, J. 2001. Balancing parent care with other roles: interrole conXict of adult daughter caregivers. Journal of Gerontology, 56 (1): 24-34.
    • Wayne, J. H., Randel, A. E., and Stevens, J. 2006. The role of identity and work-family support in work-family enrichment and its work-related consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69: 445-67.
    • Wharton, A. S., and Blair-Loy, M. 2002. The ''overtime culture'' in a global corporation: a cross-national study of Wnance professionals' interest in working part-time. Work and Occupations, 29: 32-64.
    • Williams, J. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family ConXict and What to Do about it. NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Young, M. 1999. Work-family backlash: begging the question, what's fair? Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 562: 32-46.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article