LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
O’Donnell, Elizabeth; Utz, Bettina; Khonje, Diana; van den Broek, Nynke (2014)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Autonomy, wq_160, Research Article, Maternity care, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, wa_30, Resource poor setting, wa_395, wq_152, Quality of care, wa_310
Background\ud \ud Improving the quality of care women receive during childbirth is as important as ensuring increased availability of care and numbers of healthcare providers. To be able to improve quality of care, it is important to understand what quality means for mothers as well as providers of care.\ud \ud Methods\ud \ud 33 postnatal mothers and 10 healthcare providers from all 4 major hospitals in one district in Malawi were interviewed via 27 in-depth interviews and 2 focus group discussions. Data was transcribed and analysed using the thematic framework approach.\ud \ud Results\ud \ud Perceptions of quality of care differed substantially between care providers and postnatal mothers. For caregivers, characteristics of good quality care included availability of resources while for postnatal mothers positive relationships with their caregiver were important. Lack of autonomy and decision making power is a barrier to quality of care and it exists both at the level of the patient (mother) and at the level of her caregiver with healthcare providers unable to influence decisions made by more senior staff or management. Lack of autonomy was linked with the emerging themes of staff de-motivation, frustration, lack of empowerment to make change and resulting in a poor quality of care provided.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud Creating a reciprocal understanding of what good quality care comprises and the barriers as well as promoters of this should be the starting point for improving the quality of maternity care. A renewed focus is needed on improving communication, strengthening patient rights and autonomy whilst simultaneously motivating and enabling healthcare workers to provide comprehensive and inclusive quality of care.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. WHO: Making pregnancy safer the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva: World health organization (WHO). Department of reproductive health and research (RHR); 2004. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/ 9241591692/en/index.html.
    • 2. WHO: Proportion of births attended by a skilled health worker 2008 updates; 2008. Available at http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ maternal_perinatal_health/2008_skilled_attendants/en/ Accessed: 18 July 2013.
    • 3. WHO: World Health Statistics 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from: at: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/ world_health_statistics/2013/en/index.html.
    • 4. van den Broek N, Graham W: Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG 2009, 116:18-21.
    • 5. Raven JH, Tolhurst RJ, Tang S, van den Broek N: What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery 2012, 28:e676-83.
    • 6. Hulton L, Matthews Z, Stones RW: A framework for the evaluation of quality of care in maternity services. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2000. Available at http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/40965/1/12757_Matthews.pdf.
    • 7. Qian X, Smith H, Zhou L, Liang J, Garner P: Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: An observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's views. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012, 1:1.
    • 8. WHO: Beyond the numbers: reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer. Geneva, Switzerland: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO; 2004.
    • 9. Kongnyuy E, van den Broek N: Audit for maternal and newborn health services in resource-poor countries. BJOG 2009, 116:7-10.
    • 10. Ritchie J, Spencer L, O'Connor W: Carrying out qualitative analysis. In Qualitative Research Practice. Edited by Ritchie J, Lewis J. London; Thousand Oaks: Calif.: Sage Publications; 2003:219-262.
    • 11. Pitchforth E, Lilford RJ, Kebede Y, Asres G, Stanford C, Frost J: Assessing and understanding quality of care in a labour ward: a pilot study combining clinical and social science perspectives in Gondar, Ethiopia. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71:1739-1748.
    • 12. Pettersson KO, Johansson E, de Pelembe F, Dgedge C, Christensson K: Mozambican Midwives' Views on Barriers to Quality Perinatal Care. Health Care Women Int 2006, 27:145-168.
    • 13. Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z: Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med 1998, 47:1781-95.
    • 14. D'Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussain J: Please understand why I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2008, 5:140.
    • 15. Langer A, Villar J: Promoting evidence based practice in maternal care. BMJ 2002, 324:928-929.
    • 16. Adhikari R, Sawangdee Y: Influence of women's autonomy on infant mortality in Nepal. Reprod Health 2011, 8:7.
    • 17. Miller S, Cordero M, Coleman AL, Figueroa J, Brito-Anderson S, Dabagh R, Calderon V, Cáceres F, Fernandez AJ, Nunez M: Quality of care in institutionalised deliveries: The paradox of the Dominican Republic. J Int Gynaecol Obstet 2003, 82:89-103.
    • 18. Dogba M, Fournier P: Human resources and the quality of emergency obstetric care in developing countries: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Resour Health 2009, 7:7.
    • 19. Foster J, Burgos R, Tejada C, Cáceres R, Altamonte AT, Perez LJ, Noboa FR, Urbaez MF, Heath A, Hilliard RC, Chiang F, Hall P: A community-based participatory research approach to explore community perceptions of the quality of maternal-newborn health services in the Dominican Republic. Midwifery 2010, 26:504-511.
    • 20. Attree M: Patients' and relatives' experiences and perspectives of 'good'and 'not so good'quality care. J Adv Nurs 2008, 33:456-466.
    • 21. van den Akker T, Mwagomba B, Irlam J, van Roosmalen J: Using audits to reduce the incidence of uterine rupture in a Malawian district hospital. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009, 107:289-294.
    • 22. Kongnyuy E, van den Broek N: Criteria for clinical audit of women friendly care and providers' perception in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008, 8:28.
    • 23. Kongnyuy EJ, Mlava G, van den Broek N: Criteria based audit to improve women friendly care in maternity units in Malawi. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009, 35:483-489.
    • 24. Bakker W, van den Akker T, Mwagomba B, Khukulu R, van Elteren M, van Roosmalen J: Health workers' perceptions of obstetric critical incident audit in Thyolo District, Malawi. Trop Med Int Health 2011, 16(10):1243-1250.
    • 25. Seljeskog L, Sundby J, Chimango J: Factors influencing women's choice of place of delivery in rural Malawi-an explorative study. Afr J Reprod Health 2007, 10:66-75.
    • 26. Scott T, Mannion R, Davies HT, Marshall MN: Implementing culture change in health: theory and practice. International J Qual Health Care 2003, 15:111-118.
    • 27. Morestin F, Bicaba A, de Dieu Serme J, Fournier P: Evaluating quality of obstetric care in low-resource settings: building on the literature to design tailor-made evaluation instruments - an illustration in Burkina Faso. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:20.
    • 28. Dixon-Woods M, Suokas A, Pitchforth E, Tarrant C: An ethnographic study of classifying and accounting for risk at the sharp end of medical wards. Soc Sci Med 2009, 63:362-369.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article