Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Perry, Karen L.; Rutherford, Lynda; Sajik, David M. R.; Bruce, Mieghan (2015)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Veterinary Research
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Research Article, Arthrodesis, veterinary(all), High-Energy Fracture, Swelling, Wound discharge, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Background Certain postoperative wounds are recognised to be associated with more complications than others and may be termed high-risk. Wound healing can be particularly challenging following high-energy trauma where wound necrosis and infection rates are high. Surgical incision for joint arthrodesis can also be considered high-risk as it requires extensive and invasive surgery and postoperative distal limb swelling and wound dehiscence are common. Recent human literature has investigated the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) over high-risk closed surgical incisions and beneficial effects have been noted including decreased drainage, decreased dehiscence and decreased infection rates. In a randomised, controlled study twenty cases undergoing distal limb high-energy fracture stabilisation or arthrodesis were randomised to NPWT or control groups. All cases had a modified Robert-Jones dressing applied for 72 h postoperatively and NPWT was applied for 24 h in the NPWT group. Morphometric assessment of limb circumference was performed at six sites preoperatively, 24 and 72 h postoperatively. Wound discharge was assessed at 24 and 72 h. Postoperative analgesia protocol was standardised and a Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Score (GCPS) carried out at 24, 48 and 72 h. Complications were noted and differences between groups were assessed. Results Percentage change in limb circumference between preoperative and 24 and 72 h postoperative measurements was significantly less at all sites for the NPWT group with exception of the joint proximal to the surgical site and the centre of the operated bone at 72 h. Median discharge score was lower in the NPWT group than the control group at 24 h. No significant differences in GCPS or complication rates were noted. Conclusions Digital swelling and wound discharge were reduced when NPWT was employed for closed incision management. Larger studies are required to evaluate whether this will result in reduced discomfort and complication rates postoperatively.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Stannard JP, Robinson JT, Anderson ER, McGwin G Jr, Volgas DA, Alonso JE. Negative pressure wound therapy to treat haematomas and surgical incisions following high-energy trauma. J Trauma. 2006;60(6):1301-6.
    • 2. Buote NJ, McDonald D, Radasch R. Pancarpal and Partial Carpal Arthrodesis. Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians 2009: 180-192
    • 3. Roch SP, Clements DN, Mitchell RAS, Downes C, Gemmill TJ, Macias C, et al. Complications following arthrodesis using bone plate fixation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2007;49:117-26.
    • 4. Li A, Gibson N, Carmichael S, D Bennett. Thirteen pancarpal arthrodeses using a 2.7/3.5 mm hybrid dynamic compression plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 1999;12:102-7.
    • 5. Allen MJ, Dyce J, Houlton JEF. Calcaneoquartal arthrodesis in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1993;34:205-10.
    • 6. Fox JW, Golden GT. The use of drains in subcutaneous surgical procedures. Am J Surg. 1976;132:673-4.
    • 7. Fay MF. Drainage systems. Their role in wound healing. AORN J. 1987;46:442-55.
    • 8. Morykwas MJ. External application of sub-atmospheric pressure and healing: mechanisms of action. Wound Healing Soc. 1998;8:4-5.
    • 9. Thompson JT, Marks MW. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34:673-84.
    • 10. Lambert KV, Hayes P, McCarthy M. Vacuum assisted closure: a review of development and current applications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:219-26.
    • 11. Krug E, Berg L, Lee C, Hudson D, Birke-Sorensen H, Depoorter M, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: Steps towards an international concensus. Injury. 2011;42:S1-S12.
    • 12. Demaria M, Stanley BJ, Hauptman JG, Steficek BA, Fritz MC, Ryan JM, et al. Effects of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Healing of Open Wounds in Dogs. Vet Surg. 2011;40:658-69.
    • 13. Guille AE, Tseng LW, Orsher RJ. Use of Vacuum-assisted closure for management of a large skin wound in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;230:1669-73.
    • 14. Ben Amotz R, Lanz OI, Miller JM, Filipowicz DE, King MD. The use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of distal extremity wounds in 15 dogs. Vet Surg. 2007;36:684-90.
    • 15. Jordan CJ, Kulendra E, Perry KL, Halfacree ZJ. Management of peristomal tissue necrosis following prepubic urethrostomy in a cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2012;25:433-7.
    • 16. Owen LJ, Hotston-Moore A, Holt PE. Vacuum-assisted wound closure following urine-induced skin and thigh muscle necrosis in a cat. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22:417-21.
    • 17. Bertran J, Farrell M, Fitzpatrick N. Successful wound healing over exposed metal implants using vacuum-assisted wound closure in a dog. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54:381-5.
    • 18. Herscovici Jr D, Sanders RW, Scaduto JM, Infante A, DiPasquale T. Vacuumassisted wound closure (VAC therapy) for the management of patients with high-energy soft tissue injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:683-8.
    • 19. Stannard JP, Volgas DA, McGwin G, Stewart RL, Obremskey W, Moore T, et al. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:37-42.
    • 20. Colli A. First experience with a new negative pressure incision management system on surgical incisions after cardiac surgery in high risk patients. J CardioThoracic Surg. 2011;6:160-5.
    • 21. Wilkes RP, Kipaldi DV, Zhao Y, Kazala R, McNulty A. Closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): Biomechanics. Surg Innov. 2012;19:67-75.
    • 22. DeCarbo WT, Hyer CF. Negative-pressure wound therapy applied to highrisk surgical incisions. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:299-300.
    • 23. Stanley BJ, Pitt KA, Weder CD, Fritz MC, Hauptman JG, Steficek BA. Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on healing of free full-thickness skin grafts in dogs. Vet Surg. 2013;42:511-22.
    • 24. Bristow PC, Perry KL, Halfacree ZJ, Lipscomb VJ. Use of vacuum-assisted closure to maintain viability of a skin flap in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013;243(6):863-8.
    • 25. Pachowsky M, Gusinde J, Klein A, Lehrl S, Schulz-Drost S, Schlechtweg P, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy to prevent seromas and treat surgical incisions after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2012;36:719-22.
    • 26. Morywkas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, McGuirt W. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38:553-62.
    • 27. Mendonca DA, Papini R, Price PE. Negative pressure wound therapy: a snapshot of the evidence. Int Wound J. 2006;3:261-71.
    • 28. Chen SZ, Li J, Li XY, Xu LS. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: an experimental study. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:211-7.
    • 29. Lindstedt S, Malmsjo M, Ingemansson R. Blood flow changes in normal and ischaemic myocardium during topically applied negative pressure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:568-73.
    • 30. Petzina R, Gustafsson L, Mokhtari A, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M. Effect of vacuum-assisted closure on blood flow in the peristernal thoracic wall after internal mammary artery harvesting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30:85-9.
    • 31. Wackenfors A, Gastafsson R, Sjogren J, Algotsson L, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M. Blood flow responses in the peristernal thoracic wall during vacuumassisted closure therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1724-30.
    • 32. Wackenfors A, Sjogren J, Gustafsson R, Algotsson L, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure therapy on inguinal wound edge microvascular flow. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:600-6.
    • 33. Timmers MS, Le Cessie S, Banwell P, Jukema GN . The effects of varying degrees of pressure delivered by negative pressure wound therapy on skin perfusion. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55:665-71.
    • 34. Kipaldi DV, Cunningham MR. Evaluation of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): Haematoma / seroma and involvement of the lymphatic system. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19:588-96.
    • 35. Harvey EJ, Grujic L, Early JS, Benirschke SK, Sangeorzan BJ. Morbidity associated with ORIF of intra-articular calcaneus fractures using a lateral approach. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:868-73.
    • 36. Banwell PE, Teot L. Topical negative pressure (TNP): the evolution of a novel wound therapy. J Wound Care. 2003;12:28-34.
    • 37. Morywkas MJ, Argenta LC. Non-surgical modalities to enhance healing and care of soft tissue wounds. J South Orthop Assoc. 1997;6:279-88.
    • 38. Timmenga EJ, Andreassen TT, Houthoff HJ, Klopper PJ. The effect of mechanical stress on healing skin wounds: an experimental study in rabbits using tissue expansion. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:514-9.
    • 39. Burkhardt R, Preiss A, Joss A, Lang NP. Influence of suture tension to the tearing characteristics of the soft tissues: an in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:314-9.
    • 40. Murrell JC, Psatha EP, Scott EM, Reid J, Hellebrekers LJ. Application of a modified form of the Glasgow pain scale in a veterinary teaching centre in the Netherlands. Vet Rec. 2008;162:403-8.
    • 41. Karlakki S, Brem M, Giannini S, Khanduja V, Stannard J, Martin R. Negative pressure wound therapy for management of the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery. Bone Joint Res. 2013;12:276-84.
    • 42. Smith TJ, Baltzer WI, Jelinski SE, Salinardi BJ. Inter- and intratester reliability of anthropometric assessment of limb circumference in Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg. 2013;42:316-21.
    • 43. Holt DR, Kirk SJ, Regan MC, Hurson M, Lindblad WJ, Barbul A. Effect of age on wound healing in healthy human beings. Surgery. 1992;112:293-7.
    • 44. Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF, Kincaid SA, Wright JC. Cutaneous wound healing in the cat: A macroscopic description and comparison with cutaneous wound healing in the dog. Vet Surg. 2004;33:579-87.
    • 45. Bohling MW, Henderson RA, Swaim SF, Kincaid SA, Wright JC. Comparison of the role of the subcutaneous tissues in cutaneous wound healing in the dog and cat. Vet Surg. 2006;35:3-14.
    • 46. Taylor GI, Minabe T. The angiosomes of the mammals and other vertebrates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:181-215.
    • 47. Berry GK, Stevens DG, Kreder HJ, McKee M, Schemitsch E, Stephen DJG. Open fractures of the calcaneus: a review of treatment and outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:202-6.
    • 48. Koski A, Kuokkanen H, Tukiainen E. Postoperative wound complications after internal fixation of closed calcaneal fractures: a retrospective analysis of 126 consecutive patients with 148 fractures. Skandinavian J Surg. 2005;94:243-5.
    • 49. Abidi NA, Dhawan S, Gruen GS, Vogt MT, Conti SF. Wound-healing risk factors after open reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:856-61.
    • 50. Kanis J, Devogelaer J-P, Gennari C. Practical guide for the use of bone mineral measurements in the assessment of treatment of osteoporosis: A position paper of the European Foundation for osteoporosis and bone disease. Osteoporos Int. 1996;6:256-61.
    • 51. Compston J, Cooper C, Kanis J. Bone densitometry in clinical practice. BMJ. 1995;310:1507-10.
    • 52. Banwell PE, Musgrave M. Topical negative pressure therapy: mechanisms and indications. Int Wound J. 2004;1:95-106.
    • 53. Holton L, Reid J, Scott EM, Pawson P, Nolan A. Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs. Vet Rec. 2001;48:525- 31.
    • 54. Robertson SA, Taylor PM, Lascelles BDX, Dixon MJ. Changes in thermal threshold response in 8 cats after administration of buprenorphine, butorphanol and morphine. Vet Rec. 2003;153:462-5.
    • 55. Stanway GW, Brodbelt DC, Taylor PM. A preliminary investigation comparing preoperative morphine and buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia and sedation in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2002;29:29-35.
    • 56. Taylor PM, Robertson SA, Dixon MJ, Ruprah M, Sear JW, Lascelles BDX, et al. Morphine, pethidine and buprenorphine disposition in the cat. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2001;24:391-8.
    • 57. Weese JS. A Review of post-operative infections in veterinary orthopaedic surgery. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2008;21:99-100.
    • 58. Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive Variables for Complications after TPLO with Stifle Inspection by Arthrotomy in 1000 Consecutive Dogs. Vet Surg. 2010;39:460-74.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article