LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hedmark, A; Scholz, M; Aronsson, P; Elowson, T
Publisher: Water Environment Federation
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: other

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: food and beverages, fungi, complex mixtures
Treatment of log yard runoff is required to avoid\ud contamination of receiving watercourses. The research aim was to assess\ud if infiltration of log yard runoff through planted soil systems is successful\ud and if different plant species affect the treatment performance at a fieldscale\ud experimental site in Sweden (2005 to 2007). Contaminated runoff\ud from the log yard of a sawmill was infiltrated through soil planted with\ud Alnus glutinosa (L.) Ga¨rtner (common alder), Salix schwerinii3viminalis\ud (willow variety ‘‘Gudrun’’), Lolium perenne (L.) (rye grass), and Phalaris\ud arundinacea (L.) (reed canary grass). The study concluded that there were\ud no treatment differences when comparing the four different plants with\ud each other, and there also were no differences between the tree and the\ud grass species. Furthermore, the infiltration treatment was effective in\ud reducing total organic carbon (55%) and total phosphorus (45%)\ud concentrations in the runoff, even when the loads on the infiltration\ud system increased from year to year.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Al-Senafy, M.; Al-Otaibi, M. (2002) Replenishing Groundwater Aquifers Through Recharge of Treated Wastewater. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geologica, 46 (2-3), 674-676.
    • American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation (1998) Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, D.C.
    • Hedmark, A.; Scholz, M. (2008) Review of Environmental Effects and Treatment of Runoff from Storage and Handling of Wood. Bioresour. Technol., 99 (14), 5997-6009.
    • Hedmark, A.; Scholz, M.; Elowson, T. (2009) Treatment of Log Yard Runoff Impacted by Aged Logs in a Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland. Environ. Eng. Sci., 26 (11), 1623-1632.
    • Jonsson, M.; Dimitriou, I.; Aronsson, P.; Elowson, T. (2006) Treatment of Log Yard Runoff by Irrigation of Grass and Willows. Environ. Pollut., 139 (1), 157-166.
    • Scholz, M. (2003) Performance Predictions of Mature Experimental Constructed Wetlands, which Treat Urban Water Receiving High Loads of Lead and Copper. Water Res., 37 (6), 1270-1277.
    • Scholz, M. (2006) Wetland Systems to Control Urban Runoff; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    • SMHI (2009) Dataserier med normalva¨rden fo¨r perioden 1961-1990 (Data Series with Normal Values for the Period 1961-1990). Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute): Norrko¨ping, Sweden, http://www.smhi. se/klimatdata/meteorologi/temperatur/dataserier-med-normalv%C3%A4rden-1.7354 (accessed Jan. 18, 2010).
    • Woodhouse, C.; Duff, J. B. S. (2004) Treatment of Log Yard Runoff in an Aerobic Trickling Filter. Water Qual. Res. J. Can., 39 (3), 230- 236.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article