LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Glithero, N.J.; Ramsden, S.J.; Wilson, P. (2012)
Publisher: Elsevier Applied Science [etc.]
Journal: Agricultural Systems
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Agronomy and Crop Science, Farm systems, Animal Science and Zoology, Bioenergy, Greenhouse gas emissions, Cereal straw, Modelling, Article
Climate change and energy security concerns have driven the development of policies that encourage bioenergy production. Meeting EU targets for the consumption of transport fuels from bioenergy by 2020 will require a large increase in the production of bioenergy feedstock. Initially an increase in ‘first generation’ biofuels was observed, however ‘food competition’ concerns have generated interest in second generation biofuels (SGBs). These SGBs can be produced from co-products (e.g. cereal straw) or energy crops (e.g. miscanthus), with the former largely negating food competition concerns. In order to assess the sustainability of feedstock supply for SGBs, the financial, environmental and energy costs and benefits of the farm system must be quantified. Previous research has captured financial costs and benefits through linear programming (LP) approaches, whilst environmental and energy metrics have been largely been undertaken within life cycle analysis (LCA) frameworks. Assessing aspects of the financial, environmental and energy sustainability of supplying co-product second generation biofuel (CPSGB) feedstocks at the farm level requires a framework that permits the trade-offs between these objectives to be quantified and understood. The development of a modelling framework for Managing Energy and Emissions Trade-Offs in Agriculture (MEETA Model) that combines bio-economic process modelling and LCA is presented together with input data parameters obtained from literature and industry sources. The MEETA model quantifies arable farm inputs and outputs in terms of financial, energy and emissions results. The model explicitly captures fertiliser: crop-yield relationships, plus the incorporation of straw or removal for sale, with associated nutrient impacts of incorporation/removal on the following crop in the rotation. Key results of crop-mix, machinery use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per kg of crop product and energy use per hectare are in line with previous research and industry survey findings. Results show that the gross margin – energy trade-off is £36 GJ−1, representing the gross margin forgone by maximising net farm energy cf. maximising farm gross margin. The gross margin–GHG emission trade-off is £0.15 kg−1 CO2 eq, representing the gross margin forgone per kg of CO2 eq reduced when GHG emissions are minimised cf. maximising farm gross margin. The energy–GHG emission trade-off is 0.03 GJ kg−1 CO2 eq quantifying the reduction in net energy from the farm system per kg of CO2 eq reduced when minimising GHG emissions cf. maximising net farm energy. When both farm gross margin and net farm energy are maximised all the cereal straw is baled for sale. Sensitivity analysis of the model in relation to different prices of cereal straw shows that it becomes financially optimal to incorporate wheat straw at price of £11 t−1 for this co-product. Local market conditions for straw and farmer attitudes towards incorporation or sale of straw will impact on the straw price at which farmers will supply this potential bioenergy feedstock and represent important areas for future research.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ackrill, R.W., Ramsden, S.J., Gibbons, J.M., 2001. CAP reform and the re-balancing of support for cereals and oilseeds: a farm level analysis. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 28, 207-226.
    • Anon, 2001. Farm Machinery Costs Book, eighth ed. Agro Business Consultants Ltd., Melton Mowbray.
    • Anon, 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework, EN ISO 14040, Second Edition. International Standards Organization Geneva, Switzerland.
    • Anon, 2008. Revision of the fertiliser recommendations for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Final Report DEFRA Project Code IF0114. DEFRA, London.
    • Anon, 2009. The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice: Fertiliser Use on Farm Crops for Crop Year 2008. DEFRA, York.
    • Anon, 2010. Fertiliser Manual (RB209), eighth ed. TSO, Belfast.
    • Anon, 2011a. June Survey of Agriculture and Horticulture, Defra. (accessed November 2011).
    • Anon, 2011b. Key Farm Facts. Agro Business Consultants Ltd, Melton Mowbray.
    • Anon, 2011c. Ecoinvent Centre Data. (accessed May 2011).
    • Anon, 2011d. The Agricultural Budgeting and Costing Book, 72th ed. Agro Business Consultants Ltd., Melton Mowbray.
    • Anon, 2011e. Hay and Straw, England and Wales Average Prices. Defra: Commodity Prices. (accessed November 2011).
    • Audsley, E., Stacey, K., Parsons, D.J., Williams, A.G., 2009. Estimation of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Pesticide Manufacture and Use. Cranfield University, Bedford.
    • Berry, P.M., Kindred, D.R., Olesen, J.E., Jorgensen, L.N., Paveley, N.D., 2010. Quantifying the effect of interactions between disease control, nitrogen supply and land use change on the greenhouse gas emissions associated with wheat production. Plant Pathol. 59, 753-763.
    • Börjesson, P.I.I., 1996. Energy analysis of biomass production and transportation. Biomass. Bioenerg. 11, 305-318.
    • Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Lammel, J., Barraclough, P., Kuhlmann, H., 2004. Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology II. The application to N fertiliser use in winter wheat production systems. Eur. J. Agron. 20, 265-279.
    • Cherubini, F., Ulgiati, S., 2010. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - a LCA case study. Appl. Energ. 87, 47-57.
    • Cox, G.M., Gibbons, J.M., Wood, A.T.A., Craigon, J., Ramsden, S.J., Crout, N.M.J., 2006. Towards the systematic simplification 1 of mechanistic models. Ecol. Model. 198, 240-246.
    • Doering, O.C., 1980. Accounting for energy in farm machinery and buildings. In: Pimentel, D. (Ed.), Handbook of Energy Utilisation in Agriculture. CRC Press Inc., Florida.
    • Edwards-Jones, G., Plassmann, K., Harris, I.M., 2009. Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales, UK. J. Agric. Sci. 147, 707-719.
    • Elsayed, M.A., Matthews, R., Mortimer, N.D., 2003. Carbon and Energy Balances for a Range of Biofuels Options. AEA Technology.
    • Garthwaite, D.G., Thomas, M.R., Heywood, E., Battersby, A., 2006. Pesticide Usages Survey Report 213: Arable Crops in Great Britain. UK National Statistics.
    • Gibbons, J.M., Ramsden, S.J., Blake, A., 2006. Modelling uncertainty in greenhouse gas emissions from UK agriculture at the farm level. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 347-355.
    • Gibbons, J.M., Wood, A.T.A., Craigon, J., Ramsden, S.J., Crout, N.M.J., 2010. Semiautomatic reduction and upscaling of large models: a farm management example. Ecol. Model. 221, 590-598.
    • Green, M.B., 1987. Energy in pesticide manufacture, distribution and use. In: Helsel, Z.R. (Ed.), Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 165-177.
    • Haas, G., Wetterich, F., Geier, U., 2000. Life cycle assessment framework in agriculture on the farm level. Int. J. LCA. 5, 345-348.
    • Janssen, S., van Ittersum, M.K., 2007. Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: a review of bio-economic farm models. Agric. Syst. 94, 622-636.
    • Kaltschmitt, M., Reinhardt, G.A., Stelzer, T., 1997. Life cycle analysis of biofuels under different environmental aspects. Biomass. Bioenerg. 12, 121-134.
    • Kramer, K.J., Moll, H.C., Nonhebel, S., 1999. Total greenhouse gas emissions related to the Dutch crop production system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 72, 9-16.
    • Lang, B., Allin, R., 2006. Special study into the economics of cereal production 2004. Special Studies in Agricultural Economics, Report No 64. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
    • Meul, M., Nevens, F., Reheul, D., Hofman, G., 2007. Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 119, 135-144.
    • Moerschner, J., Lücke, W., 2002. Energy investigations of different intensive rape seed rotations - a German case study. In: van Ierland, E.C., Oude Lansink, A. (Eds.), Economics of Sustainable Energy in Agriculture. Springer, pp. 27-40.
    • Mortimer, N.D., Cormack, P., Elsayed, M.A., Horne, R.E., 2003. Evaluation of the Comparative Energy, Global Warming and Socio-economic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel. Final DEFRA Report No. 20/1.
    • Nguyen, M.L., Haynes, R.J., 1995. Energy and labour efficiency for three pairs of conventional and alternative mixed cropping (pasture-arable) farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 52, 163-172.
    • Nix, J., 2008. Farm Management Pocketbook, 38th ed. Agro Business Consultants Ltd., Melton Mowbray.
    • Nix, J., 2010. Farm Management Pocketbook, 40th ed. Agro Business Consultants Ltd., Melton Mowbray.
    • Pehnt, M., 2006. Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energ. 31, 55-71.
    • Petersen, S.O., Regina, K., Pöllinger, A., Rigler, E., Valli, L., Yamulki, S., Esala, M., Fabbri, C., Syväsalo, E., Vinther, F.P., 2006. Nitrous oxide emissions from organic and conventional crop rotations in five European countries. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 200-206.
    • Powlson, D.S., Glendining, M.J., Coleman, K., Whitmore, A.P., 2011. Implications for soil properties of removing cereal straw: results from long-term studies. Agron. J. 103, 279-287.
    • Rae, A.M., 1994. Agricultural Management Economics Activity Analysis and Decision Making. CAB International, Wallingford.
    • St. Clair, S., Hillier, J., Smith, P., 2008. Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production. Biomass. Bioenerg. 32, 442-452.
    • Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L. (Eds.), 2007. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, UK.
    • Sylvester-Bradley, R., Dampney, P.M.R. Murray, A.W.A., 1984. The response of winter wheat to nitrogen. In: Needham, P., Archer, J.R., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Goodlass, G. (Eds.), The Nitrogen Requirement of Cereals, MAFF Reference Book 385. London: HMSO, pp. 151-176.
    • Tuomisto, H.L., Hodge, I.D., Riordan, P., MacDonald, D.W., 2009. Assessing the environmental impacts of contrasting farming systems. Aspect. Appl. Biol. 93, 167-172.
    • Tzilivakis, J., Jaggard, K., Lewis, K.A., May, M., Warner, D.J., 2005. Environmental impact and economic assessment for UK sugar beet production systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 111, 368-369.
    • Wells, C., 2001. Total Energy Indicators of Agricultural Sustainability: Dairy Farming Case Study. MAF, Wellington.
    • Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., Sandars, D.L., 2006. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205. Cranfield University and Defra, Bedford.
    • Woods, J., Bauen, A., 2003. Technology Status Review and Carbon Abatement Potential of Renewable Transport Fuels in the UK. UK Department of Trade and Industry.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | BBSRC Centre For Sustainab...

Cite this article