LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Chiat, S.; Roy, P. (2007)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: P1, RJ
Purpose: To determine the psychometric properties of the Preschool Repetition Test (Roy & Chiat, 2004); to establish the range of performance in typically developing children and variables affecting this; and to compare the performance of clinically referred children.\ud \ud Method: The PSRep Test comprises 18 words and 18 phonologically matched nonwords systematically varied for length and prosodic structure. This test was administered to a ‘typical’ sample of children aged 2;0–4;0 (n=315) and a ‘clinic’ sample of children aged 2;6-4;0 (n=168), together with language assessments. \ud \ud Results: Performance in the typical sample was independent of gender and SES, but was affected by age, item length, and prosodic structure, and was moderately correlated with receptive vocabulary. Performance in the clinic sample was significantly poorer, but revealed similar effects of length and prosody, and similar relations to language measures overall, with some notable exceptions. Test-retest and interrater reliability were high.\ud \ud Conclusions: The PSRep Test is a viable and informative test. It differentiates within and between ‘typical’ and ‘clinic’ samples of children, and reveals some unusual profiles within the clinic sample. These findings lay the foundations for a follow-up study of the clinic sample to investigate the predictive value of the test.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Dale, P.S., Dionne, G., Eley, T.C., & Plomin, R. (2000). Lexical and grammatical development: A behavioural genetic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 27, 619-642.
    • Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T.F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136-1146.
    • Dunn, L.M., Dunn, L.M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Second edition. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.
    • Edwards, J., Beckman, M.E., & Munson, B. (2004). The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 421-436.
    • Edwards, J., & Lahey, M. (1998). Nonword repetitions of children with specific language impairment: Exploration of some explanations for their inaccuracies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 279-309.
    • Elliot, C.D. (1996). BAS II: British Ability Scales. Second Edition. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-Nelson.
    • Ellis Weismer, S., Tomblin, J.B., Zhang, X., Buckwalter, P., Chynoweth, J.G., & Jones, M. (2000). Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 865-878.
    • Gathercole, S.E., & Adams, A-M. (1993). Phonological working memory in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 29, 770-778.
    • Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 200-213.
    • Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336-360.
    • Gathercole, S.E., & Baddeley, A.D. (1996). The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition. London: Psychological Corporation.
    • Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C.S., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A.D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887-898.
    • Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C.S., Baddeley, A.D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The Children's Test of Nonword Repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103-27.
    • Gray, S. (2003). Diagnostic accuracy and test-retest reliability of nonword repetition and digit span tasks administered to preschool children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 129-151.
    • Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.
    • Marton, K., & Schwartz, R.G. (2003). Working memory capacity and language processes in children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1138-1153.
    • Montgomery, J.W. (2004). Sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: Effects of input rate and phonological working memory. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 115-133.
    • Munson, B., Edwards, J., & Beckman, M.E. (2005). Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 61-78.
    • Munson, B., Swenson, C.L., & Manthei, S.C. (2005). Lexical and phonological organization in children: Evidence from repetition tasks. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 108-124.
    • Norbury, C.F., Bishop, D.V.M., & Briscoe, J. (2002). Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module? Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 247-268.
    • Roy, P., & Chiat, S. (2004). A prosodically controlled word and nonword repetition task for 2- to 4-year-olds: Evidence from typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 223-34.
    • Vance, M., Stackhouse, J., & Wells, B. (2005). Speech-production skills in children aged 3-7. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 29-48.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article