LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pothos, E. M.; Reppa, I. (2014)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: sense organs, skin and connective tissue diseases, education
Several researchers have reported that learning a particular categorization leads to compatible changes in the similarity structure of the categorized stimuli. The purpose of this study is to examine whether different category structures may lead to greater or less corresponding similarity change. We created six category structures and examined changes in similarity within categories or between categories, as a result of categorization, in between-participant conditions. The best supported hypothesis was that the ease of learning a categorization affects change in within categories similarity, so that greater (within categories) similarity change was observed for category structures which were harder to learn.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abdi, H. (2010). Holm's sequential Bonferroni procedure. In N. Salkind (Ed.) “Encyclopedia of Research Design”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Ashby, G. F. & Ell, S. W. (2002). Single versus multiple systems of category learning: Reply to Nosofsky and Kruschke (2002). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 175-180.
    • Ashby, F. G., Queller, S., & Berretty, P. M. (1999). On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1178-1199.
    • Ashby, F.G., Alfonso-Reese, L.A., Turken, A.U., & Waldron, E.M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105,442-481.
    • Blair, M. & Homa, D. (2001). Expanding the search for a linear separability constraint on category learning. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1153-1164.
    • Blair, M. & Homa, D. (2003). As easy to memorize as they are to classify: The 5-4 categories and the category advantage. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1293-1301.
    • Chin-Parker, S. & Ross, B. H. (2004). Diagnosticity and prototypicality in category learning: A comparison of inference learning and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 216-226.
    • Delamater, A. R. (1998). Associative mediational processes in the acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 467-482.
    • Delamater, A. R. (2012). On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning. Learning & Behavior, 40, 1-23.
    • Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630-633.
    • Folstein, J.R., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2010). Not all spaces stretch alike: How the structure of morphspaces constrains the effect of category learning on shape perception. Vision Sciences Society, 10th annual meeting.
    • Freedman, D. J., Riesenhuber, M., Poggio, T., and Miller, E. K. (2003). A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5235-5246.
    • Goldstone, R. L. (1994). Influences of Categorization on Perceptual Discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
    • Goldstone, R. L. (1995). Effects of categorization on color perception. Psychological Science, 6, 298-304.
    • Goldstone, R. L. & Steyvers, M. (2001). The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1, 116-139.
    • Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y., Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations thought category learning. Cognition, 78, 27-43.
    • Gureckis, T. M. & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). The effect of the internal structure of categories on perception. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 843). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    • Harnad, S. (Ed.) (1987). Categorical Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Jiang, X., Bradley, E., Rini, R.A., Zeffiro, T., Vanmeter, J., and Riesenhuber, M. (2007). Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity. Neuron 53, 891-903.
    • Livingston, K. R., Andrews, J. K., & Harnad, S. (1998). Categorical Perception Effects Induced by Category Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24 (3), 732-753.
    • Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309-332.
    • Lupyan, G. (2012). Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in Cognition, 3(54).
    • Markman, A. B. & Ross, B. H. (2003). Category use and category learning. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 592-613.
    • McKinley, S.C., & Nosofsky, R.M. (1995). Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21,128-148.
    • Medin, D. L. & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1981). Linear Separability in Classification Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 355-368.
    • Minda, J.P., & Smith, J.D. (2001). Prototypes in category learning: The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27,775-799.
    • Minsky, M. L. & Papert, S. A. (1988). Perceptrons. 3rd Edition. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
    • Murphy, G. L. (1991). Parts in object concepts: Experiments with artificial categories. Memory & Cognition, 19, 423-438.
    • Nakagawa S. (2004). A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 1044-1045.
    • Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104- 114.
    • Ozgen, E. & Davies, I. R. L. (2002). Acquisition of categorical color perception: A perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 477-493.
    • Pothos, E. M. & Wills, A. J. (2011). Formal approaches in categorization. Cambridge University Press.
    • Pothos, E. M. & Chater, N. (2002). A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. Cognitive Science, 26, 303-343.
    • Pothos, E. M. & Chater, N. (2005). Unsupervised categorization and category learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 733-752.
    • Pothos, E. M. & Bailey, T. M. (2009). Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity model, and the Generalized Context Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1062-1080.
    • Pothos, E. M., Edwards, D. J., & Perlman, A. (2011). Supervised vs. unsupervised categorization: Two sides of the same coin? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1692-1713.
    • Pothos, E. M., Chater, N., & Stewart, A. J. (2004). Information about the logical structure of a category affects generalization. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 371-386.
    • Pothos, E. M., Perlman, A., Bailey, T. M., Kurtz, K., Edwards, D. J., Hines, P., & McDonnell, J. V. (2011). Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks. Cognition, 121, 83-100.
    • Roberson, D. & Davidoff, J. (2000). The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 977-986.
    • Roberson, D., Davies, I., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 369-398.
    • Roberson, D., Damjanovic, L., & Pilling, M. (2007). Categorical perception of facial expressions: evidence for a “category adjustment” model. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1814-1829.
    • Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. R. L., & Shapiro, L. R. (2005). Color categories: Evidence for the cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 378-411.
    • Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
    • Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    • Ruts, W., Storms, G., & Hampton, J. (2004). Linear separability in superordinate natural language concepts. Memory & Cognition, 32, 83-95.
    • Shepard, R. N., Hovland, C. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75, whole no 517.
    • Schyns, P. G. & Oliva, A. (1999). Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations. Cognition, 69, 243-265.
    • Schyns, P., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J. (1997). The development of Features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
    • Sloutsky, V. M. & Fisher, A. V. (2004). Induction and categorization in young children: A similarity-based model. Journal of E xperimental Psychology: General, 133, 166-188.
    • Smith, J. D., Murray, M. J. Jr.,& Minda, J. P. (1997). Straight talk about linear separability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 659-680.
    • Stevenage, S. V. (1998). Which twin are you? A demonstration of induced categorical perception of identical twin faces. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 39-57.
    • Yamauchi, T., Love, B. C., & Markman, A. B. (2002). Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 585-593.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article