Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hollands, K; Agnihotri, D; Tyson, SF
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: health_and_wellbeing

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: human activities
Background: Turning is an integral component of independent mobility in which stroke survivors frequently fall. Objective: This study sought to measure the effects of competing cognitive demands on the stepping patterns of stroke survivors, compared to healthy age-match adults, during turning as a putative mechanism for falls. Methods: Walking and turning (90º) was assessed under single (walking and turning alone) and dual task (subtracting serial 3s while walking and turning) conditions using an electronic, pressure-sensitive walkway. Dependent measures were time to turn, variability in time to turn, step length, step width and single support time during three steps of the turn. Turning ability in single and dual task conditions was compared between stroke survivors (n= 17, mean ± SD: 59 ± 113 months post-stroke, 64 ± 10 years of age) and age-matched healthy counterparts (n = 15). Results: Both groups took longer, were more variable, tended to widen the second step and, crucially, increased single support time on the inside leg of the turn while turning and distracted. Conclusions. Increased single support time during turning may represent biomechanical mechanism, within stepping patterns of turning under distraction, for increased risk of falls for both stroke survivors and older adults.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Glaister BCB, G.C.; Klute, G.K.; Orendurff, M.S.;. Video task analysis of turning during activities of daily living. Gait and posture. 2007;25:289-94.
    • [2] Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E. Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: Circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2002;83(2):165-70.
    • [3] Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ. Fall frequency and characteristics and the risk of hip fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Jul;42(7):774-8.
    • [4] Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation. A challenge to rehabilitation strategies. Stroke. 1995 May;26(5):838-42.
    • [5] Hollands KL, Hollands MA, Zietz D, Wing AM, Wright C, van Vliet P. Kinematics of turning 180 degrees during the timed up and go in stroke survivors with and without falls history. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 May;24(4):358-67.
    • [6] Hollands KL, van Vliet P, Zietz D, Wing A, Wright C, Hollands MA. Stroke-related differences in axial body segment coordination during preplanned and reactive changes in walking direction. Exp Brain Res. 2010 May;202(3):591-604.
    • [7] Lam T, Luttmann K. Turning capacity in ambulatory individuals poststroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;88(11):873-83; quiz 84-6, 946.
    • [8] Takei Y, Grasso R, Amorim MA, Berthoz A. Circular trajectory formation during blind locomotion: a test for path integration and motor memory. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jun;115(2):361-8.
    • [9] Takei Y, Grasso R, Berthoz A. Quantitative analysis of human walking trajectory on a circular path in darkness. Brain Res Bull. 1996;40(5-6):491-5; discussion 5-6.
    • [10] Malouin F, Richards CL, Jackson PL, Dumas F, Doyon J. Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor-related tasks: a PET study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003 May;19(1):47-62.
    • [11] Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):329-42; quiz 472.
    • [12] Plummer-D'Amato P, Altmann L, Saracino D, Fox E, Behrman A, Mariske M. Interactions between cognitive tasks and gait after stroke: A dual task study. Gait and posture. 2008 May;27(4):683-8.
    • [13] Courtine G, Schieppati M. Human walking along a curved path. II. Gait features and EMG patterns. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2003;18(1):191-205.
    • [14] Bilney B, Morris M, Webster K. Concurrent related validity of the GAITRite walkway system for quantification of the spatial and temporal parameters of gait. Gait Posture. 2003 Feb;17(1):68- 74.
    • [15] Dennis A, Dawes H, Elsworth C, Collett J, Howells K, Wade DT, Izadi H, Cockburn J. Fast walking under cognitive-motor interference conditions in chronic stroke. Brain Res. 2009. 1287: 104- 110.
    • [16] Al-Yahya E, Dawes H, Smith L, Dennis A, Howells K, Cockburn J. Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):715- 28.
    • [17] Plummer-D'Amato P, Altmann LJP, Behrman AL, Marsiske M. Interference between cognition, double-limb support, and swing during gait in community-dwelling individuals poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24(6):542-9.
    • [18] Hausdorff JM. Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2005;2:19
    • [19] Huxham F, Gong J, Baker R, Morris M, Iansek R. Defining spatial parameters for non-linear walking. Gait and Posture. 2006;23(2):159-63.
    • [20] Robertson I WT, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The test of Everyday Attention. Bury St. Edmunds1994.
    • [21] Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The Timed Up & Go Test: Its Reliability and Association With LowerLimb Impairments and Locomotor Capacities in People With Chronic Stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(8):1641-7.
    • [22] Berg K. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada. 1989;41(6):304-11.
    • [23] Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of Walking Handicap in the Stroke Population. Stroke. 1995;26(6):982-9.
    • [24] Andersson AG, Kamwendo K, Seiger A, Appelros P. How to identify potential fallers in a stroke unit: validity indexes of 4 test methods. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2006;38(3):186- 91.
    • [25] Harris JE, Eng JJ, Marigold DS, Tokuno CD, Louis CL. Relationship of balance and mobility to fall incidence in people with chronic stroke. PHYS THER. 2005 Feb;85(2):150-8.
    • [26] Patterson KK, Parafianowicz I, Danells CJ, Closson V, Verrier MC, Staines WR, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Gait asymmetry in community-ambulating stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:304-10.
    • [27] Roerdink M, Beek PJ. Understanding inconsistent step-length asymmetries across hemiplegic stroke patients: impairments and compensatory gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 MarApr;25(3):253-8.
    • [28] Oken O, Yavuzer G. Spatio-temporal and kinematic asymmetry ratio in subgroups of patients with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Jun;44(2):127-32.
    • [29] Jorgensen L, Engstad T, Jacobsen BK. Higher Incidence of Falls in Long-Term Stroke Survivors Than in Population Controls: Depressive Symptoms Predict Falls After Stroke. Stroke. 2002 February 1, 2002;33(2):542-7.
    • [30] Hyndman D, Ashburn A. People with stroke living in the community: attention deficits, balance, ADL ability and falls. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2003 Aug 5;25(15):817-22.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article