Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Morgan, Jane; Edwards, Stephanie; Wheeldon, Linda R.
Publisher: Psychology Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
This study investigates the influence of stress grouping on verbal short-term memory (STM). English speakers show a preference to combine syllables into trochaic groups, both lexically and in continuous speech. In two serial recall experiments, auditory lists of nonsense syllables were presented with either trochaic (STRONG-weak) or iambic (weak-STRONG) stress patterns, or in monotone. The acoustic correlates that carry stress were also manipulated in order to examine the relationship between input and output processes during recall. In Experiment 1, stressed and unstressed syllables differed in intensity and pitch but were matched for spoken duration. Significantly more syllables were recalled in the trochaic stress pattern condition than in the iambic and monotone conditions, which did not differ. In Experiment 2, spoken duration and pitch were manipulated but intensity was held constant. No effects of stress grouping were observed, suggesting that intensity is a critical acoustic factor for trochaic grouping. Acoustic analyses demonstrated that speech output was not identical to the auditory input, but that participants generated correct stress patterns by manipulating acoustic correlates in the same way in both experiments. These data challenge the idea of a language-independent STM store and support the notion of separable phonological input and output processes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). London: Academic Press.
    • Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 14, 575-589. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4
    • Barbosa, P. A., Arantes, P., Meireles, A. R., & Vieira, J. M. (2005). Abstractness in SpeechMetronome Synchronisation: P-Centres as Cyclic Attractors. Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Interspeech 2005) Lisbon, Portugal. pp.1441-1444.
    • Bion, R. A. H., Benavides-Varela, S., & Nespor, M. (2011). Acoustic markers of prominence influence infants' and adults' segmentation of speech sequences. Language and Speech, 54, 123-140. doi: 10.1177/0023830910388018
    • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05), from http://www.praat.org/.
    • Boucher, V. J. (2006). On the function of stress rhythms in speech: Evidence of a link with grouping effects on serial memory. Language & Speech, 49(4), 495-519. doi: 10.1177/00238309060490040301
    • Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107(1), 127-181. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.127
    • Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106(3), 551-581. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.551
    • Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2005). Computational models of working memory: Putting long term memory into context. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.011
    • Burgess, N., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 627-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005
    • Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205-235. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.009
    • Cholin, J., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 47-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.003
    • Clark, J., & Yallop, C. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497-505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805
    • Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207-228. doi: 10.1177/00238309020450030101
    • Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Elliot, E. M., & Moreno, M. V. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 153-177. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2001.2805
    • Cutler, A. (1994). Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions. Lingua, 92, 81-104. doi: 10.1016/0024-3841(94)90338-7
    • Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 218-236. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90012-M
    • Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142. doi: 10.1016/0885- 2308(87)90004-0
    • Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113
    • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.93.3.283
    • Ellis, A. W. (1980). Errors in speech and short-term memory: The effects of phonemic similarity and syllable position. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 624-634. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90672-6
    • Fowler, C. A. (1979). “Perceptual centres” in speech production and perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 25(5), 375-388. doi:10.3758/BF03199846
    • Frankish, C. (1985). Modality-specific grouping effects in short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(2), 200-209. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90024-5
    • Frankish, C. (1989). Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(3), 469-470. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.469
    • Frankish, C., & Turner, J. (1984). Delayed suffix effect at very short delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(4), 767-777. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.4.767
    • Frick, R. W. (1989). Explanations of grouping in immediate ordered recall. Memory and Cognition, 17(5), 551-562. doi: 10.3758/BF03197078
    • Fromkin, V. (Ed.) (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. San Francisco: Academic Press.
    • Fry, D. B., (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126- 152.
    • Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand. New York: Academic Press.
    • Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Nonword repetition: More than just a phonological output task. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(8), 857-861. doi: 10.1080/02643299508251405
    • Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., & Peaker, S. (1999). Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(1), 84-95. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.562
    • Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A(1), 1-30. doi: 10.1080/02724980042000002
    • Gerken, L. A. (1994). Young children's representation of prosodic phonology: Evidence from English-speakers' weak syllable productions. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 19-38. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1
    • Hay, J. S. F., & Diehl, R. L. (2007). Perception of rhythmic grouping: Testing the iambic/trochaic law. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(1), 113-122. doi: 10.3758/BF03194458
    • Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 227-276.
    • Hayes, B. (1995). The rhythmic basis of the foot inventory. In B. Hayes (Ed.), Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies (pp.79-85). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Howard, D., & Nickels, L. (2005). Separating input and output phonology: Semantic, phonological, and orthographic effects in short-term memory impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(1), 42-77. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000582
    • Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, G. D. A., Martin, S., & Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(5), 1217-1232. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1217
    • Hulme, C., Newton, P., Cowan, N., Stuart, G., & Brown, G. (1999). Think before you speak: Pauses, memory search and trace redintegration processes in verbal memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 447- 463. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.447
    • Inkelas, S., & Zec, D. (1990).The phonology-syntax connection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). What is the relationship between phonological shortterm memory and speech processing? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 480- 486. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.002
    • Lahiri, A., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2011). Phonological trochaic grouping in language planning and language change. In S. Frota (Ed.) Prosodic categories: production, perception and comprehension. Springer.
    • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing word in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90038-J
    • Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223- 232. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4
    • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in language production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
    • Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
    • Malpass, D., Lahiri, A., & Wheeldon, L. (2010). Generating phonological words: evidence from English phrase production. CUNY: Phonology Forum Conference on the Word. New York, Jan 14-15.
    • Marcus, S. M. (1981). Acoustic determinants of perceptual center (P-center) location. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(3), 247-256. doi: 10.3758/BF03214280
    • Martin, R. C., & Freedman, M. L. (2001). Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production. Memory, 9 (4/5/6), 261-280. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000173
    • Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3-29. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2637
    • Meyer, A. S. (1992). Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analysis: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition, 42, 181-211. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90043-H
    • Morgan, J. L., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2003). Syllable monitoring in internally and externally generated English words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(3), 269-296. doi: 10.1023/A:1023591518131
    • Morrill, T. (2011). Acoustic Correlates of Stress in English Adjective-Noun Compounds. Language and Speech, 1-35. doi: 10.1177/0023830911417251
    • Morton, J., Marcus, S. M., & Frankish, C. R. (1976). Perceptual centers (P-centers). Psychological Review, 83, 405-408. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.83.5.405
    • Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
    • Page, M. P. A., Madge, A., Cumming, N., & Norris, D. G. (2007). Speech errors and the phonological similarity effect in short-term memory: Evidence suggesting a common locus. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.002
    • Quené, H., & Port, R. F. (2005). Effects of timing regularity and metrical expectancy on spoken-word perception. Phonetica, 62(1), 1-13. doi: 10.1159/000087222
    • Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
    • Reeves, C., Schmauder, A. R., & Morris, R. K. (2000). Stress grouping improves performance on an immediate serial list recall task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(6), 1638-1654. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1638
    • Revithiadou, A. (2004). The iambic/trochaic law revisited: Lengthening and shortening in trochaic systems. In B. Arsenijevic, N. Elouazizi, M. Salzmann, & M. de Vos, (eds.) Leiden Papers in Linguistics 1.1, 37-62. Leiden Universiteit/ULCL, Leiden.
    • Roelofs, A. (1997). Syllabification in speech production: Evaluation of WEAVER. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 657-693. doi: 10.1080/016909697386655
    • Roelofs, A. (2002). Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology - Section A, 55, 465-483. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000488
    • Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 292-323. doi: 10.1080/17470210601147747
    • Roodenrys, S., & Hinton, M. (2002). Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 29-33. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.1.29
    • Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Alban, J., Ellis, A. W., & Brown, G. D. A. (1994). Effects of word frequency and age of acquisition on short-term memory span. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 695-701. doi: 10.3758/BF03209254
    • Ryan, J. (1969a). Grouping and short-term memory: Different means and patterns of grouping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 137-147.
    • Ryan, J. (1969b). Temporal grouping, rehearsal and short-term memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 148-155.
    • Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration in immediate recall. Memory & Cognition, 21(2), 168-175. doi: 10.3758/BF03202729
    • Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Selkirk, E. O. (1995). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. L. Beckman, D. Walsh, & S. Urbanczyk (eds.) P apers in Optimality Theory, UMASS Occasional P apers in Phonology, Amherst, GLSA.
    • Svartvik, J., & Quirk, R. (Eds.) (1980). A corpus of English conversation. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.
    • Theissen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39(4), 706-716. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.706
    • Thorn, A. S. C., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(4), 729-735. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.729
    • Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Reintegration and the benefits of long-term knowledge in verbal short-term memory: An evaluation of Schweickert's (1993) multinomial processing tree model. Cognitive Psychology, 50(2), 133-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.07.001
    • Tilsen, S. (2011a). Metrical regularity facilitates speech planning and production. Laboratory Phonology, 2:1, 185-218. doi: 10.1515/LABPHON.2011.006
    • Tilsen, S. (2011b). Effects of syllable stress on articulatory planning observed in a stop-signal experiment. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 642-659. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.04.002
    • Toro, J. M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Mattys, S. (2009). The role of perceptual salience during the segmentation of connected speech. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 786-800. doi: 10.1080/09541440802405584
    • Tyler, M. D., & Cutler, A. (2009). Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(1), 367-376. doi: 10.1121/1.3129127
    • Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 101-175. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0739
    • Walker, I., & Hulme, C. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(5), 1256-1271. doi: 10.1037/0278- 7393.25.5.1256
    • Wheeldon, L. R. (2000). Generating prosodic structure. In L. R. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of sentence production (pp. 249-274). Hove: Psychology Press.
    • Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356-381. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2517
    • Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (2003). Is the phonological word a unit of language production? Proceeding of ICPhS, 426-431.
    • Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311-334. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1014
    • Wheeldon, L. R., & Morgan, J. L. (2002). Phoneme monitoring in internal and external speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 503-535. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000308
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article