Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Filippoupolitis, Avgoustinos; Loukas, George; Timotheou, Stelios; Dimakis, Nikolaos; Gelenbe, Erol (2009)
Publisher: North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Research and Technology Organization (RTO)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: Q1, QA75
Emergency response operations can benefit from the use of information systems that reduce decision making time and facilitate co-ordination between the participating units. We propose the use of two such systems and evaluate them with a specialised software platform that we have developed for simulation of disasters in buildings. The first system provides movement decision support to evacuees by directing them through the shortest or less hazardous routes to the exit. It is composed of a network of decision nodes and sensor nodes, positioned at specific locations inside the building. The recommendations of the decision nodes are computed in a distributed manner and communicated to the evacuees or rescue personnel in their vicinity. The second system uses wireless-equipped robots that move inside a disaster area and establish a network for two-way communication between trapped civilians and rescuers. They are autonomous and their goal is to maximise the number of civilians connected to the network. We evaluate both proposed information systems in various emergency scenarios, using the specialised simulation software that we developed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. “http://www.fipa.org,” Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA).
    • 2. Q. Li, M. D. Rosa, and D. Rus, “Distributed algorithms for guiding navigation across a sensor network,” in MobiCom '03: Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003, pp. 313-325.
    • 3. Y.-C. Tseng, M.-S. Pan, and Y.-Y. Tsai, “Wireless sensor networks for emergency navigation,” Computer, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 55-62, 2006.
    • 4. E. Gelenbe, E. Seref, and Z. Xu, “Simulation with learning agents,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 148-157, Feb 2001.
    • 5. D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager, Data networks. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1987.
    • 6. P. A. Humblet, “Another adaptive distributed shortest path algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39, pp. 995-1003, 1991.
    • 7. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest, and C. Stein, Introduction to Algorithms, Second Edition. The MIT Press, September 2001.
    • 8. E. Gelenbe, R. Lent, and Z. Xu, “Measurement and performance of a cognitive packet network,” Journal of Computer Networks, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 691-701, Dec. 2001.
    • 9. G. Loukas, S. Timotheou, and E. Gelenbe, “Robotic wireless network connection of civilians for emergency response operations,” in 23rd of the International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS 2008), Istanbul, Turkey, 2008.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article