LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wilson, R
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: built_and_human_env
Since reaching their LIAMs, Himalayan glaciers have generally undergone a period of retreat, evident from large moraines left at former ice limits. Currently, however, detailed assessments of Himalayan glacier fluctuations over the past century are limited and fail to compare spatially or temporally to records available in Central Europe, North America and Scandinavia. Consequently, the variability and magnitude of glacial change across the Himalayas, which is a key indicator of climatic change in this region, is yet to be fully understood. \ud \ud Against a background of poor data availability, Corona imagery and historic GLIMS glacier outlines now offer an opportunity to assess glacier extent for regions of the Himalayas pre-1980. Corona imagery, acquired by a US space-borne reconnaissance mission operational from 1960 to 1970, represents a particularly unique dataset offering high resolution imagery (~1.8 m) with stereo-scopic capabilities. Utilising Corona imagery, there is an opportunity to produce detailed maps of Himalayan glacier extent and extract ice surface elevation estimations, in some instances, for the first time. Despite having been de-classified in 1995, the use of Corona data in the Himalayas has been neglected, mainly because of orthorectification challenges related to its unique geometric distortions. Hence, there remains a need to develop a low cost and easily replicable method of accurately orthorectifying Corona imagery enabling its use as a large-scale glacier mapping tool in the Himalayas. In response to this need, Corona images are orthorectified in this study through the use of: (1) a non-metric photogrammetry approach; and (2) horizontal and vertical reference data acquired from ortho-ASTER imagery and the freely available ASTER GDEM. \ud \ud By comparing glacier measurements derived from Corona imagery, GLIMS data and more contemporary ASTER data, changes in glacier area, length and in some instances volume, between the 1960/70s and early 2000s, were quantified for glaciers selected within four study areas located in Uttarakhand, India and Central Nepal. Importantly, this cross-regional glacier change dataset both complements and enhances current Himalayan records. Most notably, results indicate that glaciers selected in the Bhagirathi and Pindar/Kali basins, Uttarakhand, reduced in area by a relatively small 7.97±0.29% and 7.54±0.26%, respectively. Contrastingly, glaciers selected in the more easterly located Seti and Trisula basins reduced in area by 29.78±0.2% and 50.55±0.08%, respectively. Comparisons of Corona DEM (derived from Corona stereo-pairs) and ASTER Global DEM elevations at the terminus regions of four glaciers revealed extensive surface lowering, ranging from 87±27 m to 142±27 m. For Corona processing, the methods applied were shown to orthorectify Corona images to an accuracy that allows comparable glacier outlines to be delineated, further demonstrating the mapping potential of this dataset. However, for Corona DEM extraction, the use of ASTER spatial control data was shown to be inadequate and the presence of large vertical errors in the DEMs generated hindered the measurement of glacier volume change. For this purpose, it is therefore recommended that the methods developed are tested with the use of very high resolution spatial control data.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Figure 7.10: Glacier changes from the period of 1959-1975 (outlined in blue) to 2003-2007 (outlined in red) in a portion of the SB site. Background image: Ortho ASTER, 5/10/2003.
    • Figure 7.12: Average maximum and minimum ice elevation in 1959-1975 (blue line) in relation to size, and the average minimum elevation of ice in 2003-2007 (red line).
    • Figure 7.13: Glacier changes from the period of 1965-1978 (outlined in blue) to 2000-2003 (outlined in red) in a portion of the LT site. Background image: Ortho ASTER, 24/10/2001.
    • Figure 7.14: Comparison of absolute area loss and percentage area loss for glaciers within each of the four size classes measured between 1965-1966 to 2000-2003 and 1974-1975 to 2000-2003.
    • Figure 7.15: Average maximum and minimum ice elevation in 1965-1975 (in blue) in relation to size, and the average minimum elevation of ice in 2003-2007 (red line).
    • Figure 7.16: Distribution of absolute ice area (red and blue columns) and percentage ice area losses (green columns) during 1965 and 2001 at the GC site according to 100 m elevation intervals.
    • Figure 7.17: Distribution of absolute ice area (red and blue columns) and percentage ice area losses (green columns) during 1964 and 2004 at the ND site according to 100 m elevation intervals.
    • Figure 7.18: Distribution of absolute ice area (red and blue columns) and percentage ice area losses (green columns) during 1959-1975 and 2003-2007 at the SB site according to 100 m elevation intervals.
    • Figure 7.19: Distribution of absolute ice area (red and blue columns) and percentage ice area losses (green columns) during 1965-1978 and 2000-2003 at the LT site according to 100 m elevation intervals.
    • Bolch, T., Menounos, B., Wheate, R. (2010b.). Landsat-based inventory of glaciers in western Canda, 1985-2005. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 127-137.
    • Bolch, T., Pieczonka, T., Benn, D. I. (2010). Longest time series of glacier mass changes in the Himalaya based on stereo imagery. The Cryosphere Discuss, 4, 2593- 2613.
    • Booij, M. J. (2005). Imapact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions. Journal of Hydrology, 303, 176-198.
    • Bown, F., Rivera, A., Aguna, C. (2008). Recent glacier variations of the Aconcagua basin, Central Chilean Andes. Annals of Glaciology, 48, 43-48.
    • Braithwaite, R. J. (2009). Review. Raina, V.K & Srivastava, D., Glacier atlas of India. J.
    • Glaciol., 55 (193), 938.
    • Braithwaite, R. J., Oleson, O. B. (1989). Calculation of glacier ablation from air temperature, West Greenland. In: Oerlemans, J., (Ed.), Glacier fluctuations and climate change, Glaciology and Quaternary Geology, Dordrecht, 219-233.
    • Braithwaite, R. J., Raper, S. C. B. (2009). Estimating equilibrium-line altitude (ELA) from glacier inventory data. Annals of Glaciology, 50 (53), 127-132.
    • Braithwaite, R. J., Raper, S. C. B. (2007). Glaciological conditions in seven contrasting regions estimated with degree-day model. Annals of Glaciology, 46, 297-302.
    • Braithwaite, R. J., Zhang, Y. (1999). Modelling changes in glacier mass balance that may occur as a result of climate changes. Geografiska Annaler, 81, 489-496.
    • Braithwaite, R. J., Zhang, Y. (2000). Sensitivity of mass balance of five Swiss glaciers to temperature changes assessed by tuning a degree-day model. Journal of Glaciology, 46, 7-14.
    • Brocklehurst, S. H., Whipple, K. X. (2004). Hypsometry of glaciated landscapes. Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 29, 907-26.
    • Buchroithner, M, F., Bolch, T. (2007). An automated method to delineate the ice extension of the debris-covered glaciers at Mt. Everest based on ASTER imagery.
    • Proc. 9th int. Sympos. On High Mountain Remote Sensing Cartography, 11-22 September 2006 held in Graz, Austria, 8 pages.
    • Burrough,W. (Ed.), (2003). Climate into the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 240 pages.
    • Dobhal, D. P., Gergen, J. T., Thayyen, R. J. (2004). Recession and morphogeometrical changes of Dokriani glacier (1962-1995) Garhwal Himalaya, India. Current Science, 86 (5), 692-696.
    • Dobhal, D. P., Gergen, J. T., Thayyen, R. J. (2008). Mass balance studies of the Dokriani Glacier from 1992 to 2000, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Bulletin of Glaciological Research, 25, 9-17.
    • Dobhal, D. P., Kumar, S., Mundepi, A. K. (1995). Morphology and glacier dynamics studies in Monsoon arid transition zone: An example from Chhota Shigri glacier, Himachal Himalaya. India Current Science, 68 (9), 936-944.
    • Dobhal, D. P., Mehta, M. (2010). Surface morphology elevation changes and terminus retreat Dokriani glacier, Garhwal Himalaya: Implication of climate change.
    • Himalayan Geology, 31 (1), 71-78.
    • Fujii, Y., Higuchi, K. (1977). Statistical analysis of the forms of the glaciers in the Khumbu Himal. Journal of the Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, 39 (Special Issue), 9- 17.
    • Fujisada, H., Bailey, G., Kelly, G., Hara, S., Abrams, M. (2005). ASTER DEM performance. Geoscience Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions, 43, 2707-2714.
    • Fujita, K. (2008). Influence of precipitation seasonality on glacier mass balance and its sensitivity to climate change. Annals of Glaciology, 48, 88-92.
    • Fujita, K., Ageta, Y. (2000). Effect of summer accumulation on glacier mass balance on the Tibetan Plateau revealed by mass-balance model. Journal of Glaciology, 46 (153), 244-252.
    • Furbish, D.J., Andrews, J.T. (1984). The use of hypsometry to indicate long-term stability and response of valley glaciers to changes in mass transfer. Journal of Glaciology, 30, 199-211.
    • Fountain, A. G., Tangborn, W. V. (1985). The effects of glaciers on streamflow variations. Water Resource Research, 21, 579-586.
    • Fushimi, H., In (eds Domoto, A. et al.), Tsukiji-Shokan Pub Co Ltd., Japan and The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, 2000, 42-45.
    • Kargel, J. S., Cogley, G. J., Leonard, G. L., Haritashya, U., Byers, A. (2011). Himalayan glaciers: The big picture is a montage. PNAS, 108 (36), 14709-14710.
    • Karma., Ageta, Y., Naito, N., Iwata, S., Yabuki, H. (2003). Glacier distribution in the Himalayas and glacier shrinkage from 1963 to 1993 in the Bhutan Himalayas.
    • Japanese Society of Snow and Ice, 20, 29-40.
    • Kaser, G., Fountain, A. G., Jansson, P. (2002). A manual for monitoring the mass balance of mountain glaciers. IHP-V1-Technical documents in hydrology, 59 pages.
    • Kasser, P. (1959). Der Einfluss von Gletscherruckgang un Gletschervorstoss auf den Wasserhaushalt. Wasser- und Energiewirtschaft, 6, 155-168.
    • Kattelmann, R. (1987). Uncertainty in Assessing Himalayan Water Resources.
    • Mountain Research and Development, 7 (3), 279-286.
    • Kayastha, R. B., Harrsion, S. P. (2008). Changes of the equilibrium-line altitude since the Little Ice Age in the Nepalese Himalaya, Annals of Glaciology, 48, 93-99.
    • Mayewski, P. A., Jeshkke, P. A. (1979). Himalayan and Trans-Himalayan glacier fluctuations since AD 1812. Artic and Alpine Research. 11, 267-287.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article