LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wilson, Ian (2016)
Publisher: University of Cumbria
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300, Z481, Z48

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
This research project aims, through a practitioner research approach, to survey a group of second year undergraduate initial teacher education students about the features of PowerPoint presentations used within their primary science module. Student surveys were completed at the end of each session and, through the analysis of these responses, key points will be identified that would indicate good practice in the creation of PowerPoint presentations which support and enhance the students’ learning, attention in sessions and their note-taking. The conclusions of this report suggest recommendations not only to the layout, presentation and content of PowerPoint presentations but also to the use of transitions and animations. The findings of this research would be relevant to any practitioner who is delivering information to groups of students via PowerPoint.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, C. (2007) PowerPoint, habits of id, ad lassoo ultue 38 (4) February, 389-411.
    • Apperson, J.M., Laws, E.L. and Scepansky, J.A. (2006a) An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation strutue i udegaduate ouses, Computers and Education, 50 (1), 148 - 153.
    • Apperson, J.M., Laws, E.L. and Scepansky, J.A. (2006b) The impact of presentation graphics on students epeiee i the lassoo Computers and Education, 47 (1), 116-126.
    • Armitage, S. (2008) PowerPoint and Studets Leaig - Briefing paper [Internet] Lancaster University. Available from : < http://www.lancs.ac.uk/celt/celtweb/files/Powerpoint%20and%20student%20learning%20final .pdf> [Accessed 25th July 2012].
    • Bartsch, R.A. and Cobern, K.M. (2003) Effectiveness of PowerPoit pesetatios i letues, Computer and Education, 41, 77-86.
    • BERA (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, British Educational Research Association.Available from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERAEthical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1 [Accessed 21st December 2015]
    • Berk, R.A. (2011) Research on PowerPoint: From Basi Featues to Multiedia, International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7 (1), 24-35.
    • Bond, T.G. and Fox, C.M. (2007) Applying the Rasch model - Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Burke, D. and Apperley, A. (2003-4) PowerPoint and Pedagogy. Learning and Teaching Projects 2003/4, Centre for Learning and Teaching, University of Wolverhampton, 77-81.
    • Clark, J. (2008) PowerPoint and Pedagogy - Maintaining Student Interest in Universit Letues, College Teaching, 56 (1), 39-45.
    • Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2011) Research Methods in Education, 7th ed. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Craig, R.J. and Amernic, J.H. (2006) PowerPoint Presentation Technology and the Dynamics of Teahig, Innovative Higher Education, 31, 147-160.
    • Denscombe, M. (2010) The Good Research Guide for small -scale social research projects 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
    • Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning (2011) Effective Use of PowerPoint [Internet] Available from: http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/teachingandlearningresources/technology/PowerPoint/index.php [Accessed 19th February 2012].
    • Giles, R. M., and Baggett, P.V. (2008) Investigating Technologies in Teacher Education: Does PowerPoint Enhance Retention or Influence Attitudes? STRATE Journal, 17 (1), 44-52.
    • Hartley, J. and Betts, L.R. (2010) Four layouts and a finding: the effects of changes in order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert-tpe sales, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13 (1) February, 17-27.
    • Holzl, J. (1997) Twelve tips for effective PowerPoint presentations fo tehologiall halleged, Medical Teacher, 19 (3), 175-179.
    • James, K.E., Burke, L.A., Hutchins, H.M. (2006) Powerful or Pointless? Faculty Versus Student Perceptions of PowerPoit Use i Busiess Eduatio, Business Communication Quarterly, 69(4) December, 374-396.
    • Jones, A.M., (2003) The use and abuse of PowerPoint in Teaching and Learning in the Life Sciences: A Personal Overview [Internet] Bioscience Education . Available from: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol2/beej-2-3.aspx [Accessed 16th February 2012].
    • Keefe, D.D., and Willett, J.D. (2004) A Case for PowerPoint as a Fault Authoig “ste, Cell Biology Education, 3, 156-158.
    • Koshy, V. (2010) Action Research for Improving Educational Practice - A step by step guide 2nd ed. London: Sage.
    • Lanius, C. (2004) PoePoit, ot You Gadothes Pesetatios, ut Is it Eil? Cell Biology Education, 3, 158-160.
    • Maxwell, A. (2007) Ban the Bullet-Point! - Content-Based PoePoit fo Histoias, The History Teacher, 41(1) November, 39-54.
    • Mason, R. and Hlynka, D. (1998) PoePoit i the classroom: Where is the Power? Education Technology. Available from: http://www.umanitoba.ca/centres/ukrainian_canadian/hlynka/papers/ppt_point.html [Accessed 23rd August 2012].
    • McDonald, K. (2004) Examining PowerPointlessness, Cell Biology Education, 3, 160-161.
    • Menter, I., Elliot, D., Hulme, M., Lewin, J. and Lowden, K. (2011) A guide to practitioner Research in Education. London: Sage.
    • McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. (2010) You and your action research 3rd ed. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Munn, P. and Drever, E. (1999) Using Questionnaires in small- scale research - A teachers' guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
    • Oppenheim, A.N. (1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
    • Polyakova-Norwood, V. (2009) Wakig up fo PoePoit -Idued “leep:Effetie Use of PowerPoint for Teaching, USC College of Nursing. Available from:
    • Redline, C.D. et al (2002) Factors that Influence Reading and Comprehension in Self-Administered Questionnaires Available from: http://www.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/2003/factorsthatinfluencereading.pdf [Accessed 25th July 2012].
    • Roehling, P.V. and Trent-Brown, S. (2011). Differential use and benefits of PowerPoint in upper level versus lower level ouses, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20 (1) March, 113-124.
    • Schwarz, N et al (1991) Rating Scales - Numeric values may change the eaig of sale laels, Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 570-582.
    • Simons, T. (2005) 'Does PowerPoint make you stupid? [Available from: http://fp.arizona.edu/kkh/dendro/PDFs.Tufte/Does%20PowerPoint%20Make%20you%20Stupi d.pdf> [Accessed 30th July 2012].
    • The Guardian (2009), News [Internet], May 2009, Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/may/12/university-teaching [Accessed 30h May 2012].
    • Vallance, M. and Towndrow, P.A. (2007) Toads the ifoed use of ifoatio ad ouiatio teholog i eduatio: a espose to Ad as PoePoit, hait s of mind and lassoo ultue, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39 (2), 219-227.
    • Vik, G. N. (2004) Breaking Bad Habits: Teaching Effective PowerPoint Use to Working Graduate “tudets, Business Communication Quarterly, June 225-228.
    • Voss, D. (2004) PowerPoint in the Classroom, is it Really Necessary? Cell Biology Education, 3, 155- 156.
    • Yilmazel-Sahin, Y. (2009) A Compaiso of gaduate ad udegaduate teahe eduatio stude ts perception of their instructors use of Miosoft PoePoit, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18 (3) October, 361-380.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article