Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wilson, Ian (2016)
Publisher: Unipress
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300, Z481, Z48

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
This research project aims, through a practitioner research approach, to survey a group of second year undergraduate initial teacher education students about the features of PowerPoint presentations used within their primary science module. Student surveys were completed at the end of each session and, through the analysis of these responses, key points will be identified that would indicate good practice in the creation of PowerPoint presentations which support and enhance the students’ learning, attention in sessions and their note-taking. The conclusions of this report suggest recommendations not only to the layout, presentation and content of PowerPoint presentations but also to the use of transitions and animations. The findings of this research would be relevant to any practitioner who is delivering information to groups of students via PowerPoint.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, C. (2007) 'PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture', Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38 (4) February, 389-411.
    • Apperson, J.M., Laws, E.L. and Scepansky, J.A. (2006a) 'An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses', Computers and Education, 50 (1), 148 - 153.
    • Apperson, J.M., Laws, E.L. and Scepansky, J.A. (2006b) 'The impact of presentation graphics on students' experience in the classroom' Computers and Education, 47 (1), 116-126.
    • Armitage, S. (2008) PowerPoint and Students' Learning - Briefing paper [Internet] Lancaster University. Available from : < http://www.lancs.ac.uk/celt/celtweb/files/Powerpoint%20and%20student%20learning%20final .pdf> [Accessed 25th July 2012].
    • Bartsch, R.A. and Cobern, K.M. (2003) 'Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures', Computer and Education, 41, 77-86.
    • BERA (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, British Educational Research Association.Available from: https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BERAEthical-Guidelines-2011.pdf?noredirect=1 [Accessed 21st December 2015]
    • Berk, R.A. (2011) 'Research on PowerPoint: From Basic Features to Multimedia', International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7 (1), 24-35.
    • Bond, T.G. and Fox, C.M. (2007) Applying the Rasch model - Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Burke, D. and Apperley, A. (2003-4) 'PowerPoint and Pedagogy. Learning and Teaching Projects 2003/4', Centre for Learning and Teaching, University of Wolverhampton, 77-81.
    • Clark, J. (2008) 'PowerPoint and Pedagogy - Maintaining Student Interest in University Lectures', College Teaching, 56 (1), 39-45.
    • Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K. (2011) Research Methods in Education, 7th ed. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Craig, R.J. and Amernic, J.H. (2006) 'PowerPoint Presentation Technology and the Dynamics of Teaching', Innovative Higher Education, 31, 147-160.
    • Denscombe, M. (2010) The Good Research Guide for small -scale social research projects 4th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
    • Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning (2011) 'Effective Use of PowerPoint' [Internet] Available from: http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/teachingandlearningresources/technology/PowerPoint/index.php [Accessed 19th February 2012].
    • Giles, R. M., and Baggett, P.V. (2008) 'Investigating Technologies in Teacher Education: Does PowerPoint Enhance Retention or Influence Attitudes?' STRATE Journal, 17 (1), 44-52.
    • Hartley, J. and Betts, L.R. (2010) 'Four layouts and a finding: the effects of changes in order of the verbal labels and numerical values on Likert-type scales', International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13 (1) February, 17-27.
    • Holzl, J. (1997) 'Twelve tips for effective PowerPoint presentations for technologically challenged', Medical Teacher, 19 (3), 175-179.
    • James, K.E., Burke, L.A., Hutchins, H.M. (2006) 'Powerful or Pointless? Faculty Versus Student Perceptions of PowerPoint Use in Business Education', Business Communication Quarterly, 69(4) December, 374-396.
    • Jones, A.M., (2003) 'The use and abuse of PowerPoint in Teaching and Learning in the Life Sciences: A Personal Overview' [Internet] Bioscience Education . Available from: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol2/beej-2-3.aspx [Accessed 16th February 2012].
    • Keefe, D.D., and Willett, J.D. (2004) 'A Case for PowerPoint as a Faculty Authoring System', Cell Biology Education, 3, 156-158.
    • Koshy, V. (2010) Action Research for Improving Educational Practice - A step by step guide 2nd ed. London: Sage.
    • Lanius, C. (2004) 'PowerPoint, not Your Grandmother's Presentations, but Is it Evil?' Cell Biology Education, 3, 158-160.
    • Maxwell, A. (2007) 'Ban the Bullet-Point! - Content-Based PowerPoint for Historians', The History Teacher, 41(1) November, 39-54.
    • Mason, R. and Hlynka, D. (1998) 'PowerPoint' in the classroom: Where is the Power?' Education Technology. Available from: http://www.umanitoba.ca/centres/ukrainian_canadian/hlynka/papers/ppt_point.html [Accessed 23rd August 2012].
    • McDonald, K. (2004) 'Examining PowerPointlessness', Cell Biology Education, 3, 160-161.
    • Menter, I., Elliot, D., Hulme, M., Lewin, J. and Lowden, K. (2011) A guide to practitioner Research in Education. London: Sage.
    • McNiff, J. and Whitehead, J. (2010) You and your action research 3rd ed. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Munn, P. and Drever, E. (1999) Using Questionnaires in small- scale research - A teachers' guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
    • Oppenheim, A.N. (1992) Questionnaire design, interviewing, and attitude measurement 2nd ed. London: Continuum.
    • Polyakova-Norwood, V. (2009) 'Waking up from “PowerPoint-Induced Sleep”:Effective Use of PowerPoint for Teaching', USC College of Nursing. Available from:
    • Redline, C.D. et al (2002) 'Factors that Influence Reading and Comprehension in Self-Administered Questionnaires' Available from: http://www.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/2003/factorsthatinfluencereading.pdf [Accessed 25th July 2012].
    • Roehling, P.V. and Trent-Brown, S. (2011). 'Differential use and benefits of PowerPoint in upper level versus lower level courses', Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20 (1) March, 113-124.
    • Schwarz, N et al (1991) 'Rating Scales - Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels', Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 570-582.
    • Simons, T. (2005) 'Does PowerPoint make you stupid?' [Available from: http://fp.arizona.edu/kkh/dendro/PDFs.Tufte/Does%20PowerPoint%20Make%20you%20Stupi d.pdf> [Accessed 30th July 2012].
    • The Guardian (2009), News [Internet], May 2009, Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/may/12/university-teaching [Accessed 30h May 2012].
    • Vallance, M. and Towndrow, P.A. (2007) 'Towards the 'informed use' of information and communication technology in education: a response to Adams' PowerPoint, habits of mind and classroom culture', Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39 (2), 219-227.
    • Vik, G. N. (2004) 'Breaking Bad Habits: Teaching Effective PowerPoint Use to Working Graduate Students', Business Communication Quarterly, June 225-228.
    • Voss, D. (2004) 'PowerPoint in the Classroom, is it Really Necessary?' Cell Biology Education, 3, 155- 156.
    • Yilmazel-Sahin, Y. (2009) 'A Comparison of graduate and undergraduate teacher education students' perception of their instructors' use of Microsoft PowerPoint', Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18 (3) October, 361-380.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article