Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Browne, Kevin D.; Hines, Morag; Tully, Ruth (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Objectives: Within the literature on sex offending, much attention is paid to the distinction between those sex offenders who offend against adults and those who offend against children. In contrast, there is a paucity of research into sex offenders who offend specifically against elderly or older victims.\ud Method: A detailed interview and psychometric tests were conducted with a sample of 28 sex offenders who had been convicted of a sexually motivated offence against an older female. These data were compared to a sample of 23 child sex offenders.\ud Results: Results indicate that amongst other significant differences between these sub-groups, men who offend against older women are generally younger, are more violent, and are more likely to use a weapon and cause injury and death compared to child sex offenders. The men who offended against children were more likely to think about and plan their offending, spend more time with the victim pre and post offence, admit sexual arousal during the offence, and admit to a sexual motivation for the offence.\ud Conclusions: This study suggests that men who sexually offend against older women and men who sexually offend against children are distinct groups. Treatment and risk management strategies should take this into account. Further exploration of this sub-group of offenders is recommended to help inform treatment and risk management strategies for sex offenders who offend against older people.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Burgess, A. W., Dowdell, E. B., & Prentky, R. A. (2000). Sexual abuse of nursing home residents. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 38, 10-18
    • Burgess, A., & Clements, P. (2006). Information processing of sexual abuse in elders. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 2, 113-120.
    • Burn, M. F. & Brown, S. (2013). A review of the cognitive distortions in child sex offenders: An examination of the motivations and mechanisms that underlie the justification for abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(3). 225-236.
    • Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural Myths and Supports for Rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230.
    • Cohen, M. L., Seghorn, T., & Galamas, W. (1969). Sociometric Study of Sex Offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 94, 249-255.
    • Cooper, G. M., & King, M. R. (2006). Interviewing the incarcerated offender convicted of sexually assaulting the elderly. Journal of Forensic
    • Eckert, L., & Sugar, N. (2008). Older victims of sexual assault: An underrecognized population. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 198, 688.e1-688.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.021
    • Falshaw, L., Bates, A., Patel, V., Corbett, C., & Friendship, L. (2003). Assessing reconviction, reoffending and recidivism in a sample of UK sexual offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 207-215.
    • Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who rape. New York: Plenum Press
    • Groth, A. N. (1978). The Older Rape Victim and Her Assailant. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11(2), 203-215.
    • Groth, A. N., Burgess, A. W., and Holstrom, L. L. (1977). Rape: Power, Anger and Sexuality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239-1243.
    • Jeary, K. (2005). Sexual abuse and sexual offending against elderly people: A focus on perpetrators and victims. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 16, 328-343.
    • Längström, N., Enebrink, P., Laurén, E. M., Lindblom, J., Werkö, S., & Hanson, R. K. (2013). Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions. BMJ, 9, 347:f4630. doi:10.1136.bmj.f4630
    • Lea, S., J. Hunt. L., & Shaw, S. (2011) Sexual assault of older women by
    • strangers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(11), 2303-2320
    • Knight, R. A. and Prentky, R. A. (1990). Classifying Sexual Offenders. The Development and Corroboration of Taxonomic Models. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws and H. E. Barbaree (ed). The Handbook of Sexual Assault. Issues, Theories and Treatment of the Offender. New York: Plenum Press.
    • Mann, R. E. & Barnett, G. D. (2013). Victim Empathy Intervention With Sexual Offenders: Rehabilitation, Punishment, or Correctional Quackery? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 282-301.
    • Mehrabian, A & Epstein, N. C. (1972). A Measure of Emotional Empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543.
    • Muram, D, Miller, K & Cutler, A. (1992). Sexual Assault of the Elderly Victim. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7 (1): 70-76 .
    • Nichols, H. R. & Molinder, I. (1984). Multiphasic Sex Inventory (MSI) manual. Tacoma, WA: Author.
    • Novaco, R. W. (2003). The Novaco Anger scale and Provocation Inventory (NAS- PI). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
    • Poulos, C., & Sheridan, D. (2008). Genital injuries in post-menopausal women after sexual assault. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 20, 323 - 335. doi:10.1080/08946560802359243
    • Ramsey-Klawsnik, H., Teaster, P. B., Mendiondo, M. S., Abner, E. L., Cecil, K. A., & Tooms, M. R. (2007). Sexual abuse of vulnerable adults in
    • Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., Lang, C. & Cormier. C. (2006) Violent sex offenses: How are they best measured form official records. Law & Human Behavior, 30, 525-541 DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9022-3
    • Schamborg, S., Tully, R. J., & Browne, K. D. (2015). The use of the StateTrait Anger Expression Inventory-II with forensic populations: A psychometric critique. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15577932
    • Safarik, M. E., Jarvis, J. P., & Nussbaum, K. (2002). Sexual homicide of elderly females: Linking offender characteristics to victim and crime scene attributes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 500-525.
    • Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Manual for the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    • Stermac, L., Del Bove, G., Brazeau, P., & Bainbridge, D. (2006). Patterns in sexual assault violence as a function of victim perpetrator degree of relatedness. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 13(1), 41- 58.
    • Teaster, P. B., Ramsey-Klawsnik, H., Mendiondo, M. S., Abner, E., Cecil, K., & Tooms, M. (2007). From behind the shadows: A profile of the sexual abuse of older men residing in nursing homes. Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 19, 29-45.
    • Thomas, L., Titley, D., & Esquibel, K. (2015). Where are mid-life women in the research? Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 51, 86-97
    • Tully, R. J., & Browne, K. D. (2015). Appraising the Risk Matrix 2000 sex offender risk assessment tool. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(2), 211 224. doi:10.1177/0306624X13508928
    • Employed at time of offending 11 (39.30)
    • Weapon used* 15 (53.60)
    • Offence in victim's home* 27 (96.40)
    • Targeted specific victim* 9 (32.10)
    • Planned a time to offend* 11 (39.30)
    • Attended offence location specifically 18 (64.30)
    • Violence used* 26 (92.90)
    • Persuasion used* 2 (7.10)
    • Erection within offence* 17 (60.70)
    • Offended alone 25 (89.30)
    • Negative view of victim* 13 (46.40)
    • Offender masturbated victim 0
    • Victim masturbated offender* 1 (3.60)
    • Vaginal penetration 19 (67.90)
    • Anal penetration 2 (7.10)
    • Oral sex* 6 (21.40)
    • Offender ejaculated* 9 (32.10)
    • Offender perceives sexually 15 (53.60)
    • Offender perceives offence motivated 9 (32.10)
    • Offender friendly to victim* 5 (17.90)
    • Covered up offence* 20 (71.40)
    • Stole from victim 8 (28.60)
    • Remained with victim more than 10 2 (7.10)
    • Fantasised about offence* 5 (17.90)
    • Victim physically harmed/dead* 17 (60.70)
    • * p<0.05
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article