LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Thorsen, Einar (2017)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
In light of Edward Snowden’s global surveillance disclosures, this article examines news discourses about online communication security and surveillance circumvention practices. It analyses 1249 news reports mentioning encryption in The Guardian and The New York Times, covering a three-year period from June 2012 to June 2015 (one year before and two years after the Snowden revelations). Whilst there was a marked increase in the volume of news articles mentioning encryption post-Snowden, the context in which encryption is discussed has since shifted from an initial emphasis on “surveillance” towards “security” issues. However, the research found that greater news coverage of encryption did not necessarily mean an increase in depth of coverage, with most mentions of encryption vague and non-descript. In terms of source usage, the research finds an emphasis on private corporations in both publications analysed. This is problematic when many of the organisations allowed to speak on encryption were those accused of colluding with the US and UK Governments to aid covert mass surveillance—the likes of Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft and so forth—thus providing them with a platform to exonerate themselves from the accusations. This contradictory depiction of communication security serves the status quo and prevents advancement of the “encrypted by default” communication practice called for by Snowden. This, by extension, has serious implications for both journalistic freedom and civil liberties since it helps to perpetuate the ability of nation states and corporations to conduct indiscriminate mass surveillance.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bakir, Vian, and Andrew McStay. 2016. “Assessing interdisciplinary academic and multistakeholder positions on transparency in the post-Snowden leak era.” Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics 12(3): 25-38.
    • Barnard-Wills, David. 2011. “UK News Media Discourses of Surveillance.” The Sociological Quarterly, 52(4): 548-567.
    • Beck, Ulrich. 2006. “Living in the world risk society”. Economy and Society. 35(3): 329- 345. doi: 10.1080/03085140600844902
    • Bradshaw, Paul. 2015. “Chilling effect: regional journalists' source protection and information security practice in the wake of the Snowden and RIPA revelations.” Surveillance and Citizenship: State-Media-Citizen Relations after the Snowden Leaks Cardiff University, 1-32.
    • Brevini, Benedetta, Arne Hintz and Patrick McCurdy, eds. 2013. Beyond WikiLeaks: Implications for the future of communications, journalism and society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Christensen, Lars Thøger, and George Cheney. 2015. “Peering into Transparency: Challenging Ideals, Proxies, and Organizational Practices”. Communication Theory, 25(1): 70-90. doi: 10.1111/comt.12052
    • Couldry, Nick. 2015. “The myth of 'us': digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity”. Information, Communication & Society. 18(6): 608-626. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2014.979216
    • Entman, Robert M., 1993. “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”. Journal of Communication. 43(4). pp. 51-58.
    • Hall, Stuart. 1973. Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    • Henrichsen, Jennifer R., Michelle Betz and Joanne M. Lisosky. 2015. Building digital safety for journalism: a survey of selected issues. Paris: UNESCO.
    • Hillebrand, Claudia. 2012. “The Role of News Media in Intelligence Oversight”. Intelligence and National Security, 27(5): 689-706. doi: 10.1080/02684527.2012.708521
    • Hintz, Arne, Lina Dencik and Karin Wahl-Jorgensen. 2017, forthcoming. “Surveillance in a Digital Age”. In The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited by Bob Franklin and Scott Eldridge II. London: Routledge.
    • Kleberg, Carl Fridh. 2015. The death of source protection? Protecting journalists' source in a post-Snowden age. London: LSE Polis.
    • Lashmar, Paul. 2016. “No More Sources?” Journalism Practice: 1-24. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2016.1179587
    • Einar Thorsen (2016) Cryptic Journalism: News reporting of encryption, Digital Journalism, DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2016.1243452 19
    • Lischka, Juliane A. 2015. “Surveillance discourse in UK broadcasting since the Snowden revelations.” dcssproject.net. http://www.dcssproject.net/files/2015/12/DCSS_Broadcasting-report.pdf
    • Lyon, David. 2014. “Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique.” Big Data & Society, 1(2): 1-13. doi: 10.1177/2053951714541861
    • Monahan, Torin. 2006. “Counter-surveillance as Political Intervention?” Social Semiotics. 16(4): 515-534. doi: 10.1080/10350330601019769
    • Munro, Iain. 2015. “Organizational resistance as a vector of deterritorialization: The case of WikiLeaks and secrecy havens.” Organization: 1-21. doi: 10.1177/1350508415591362
    • Penney, Jonathon W. 2013. “The Cycles of Global Telecommunication Censorship and Surveillance.” SSRN Electronic Journal. 36(3): 693-753.
    • de Vreese, Claes H., 2012. “New Avenues for Framing Research.” American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3): 365-375. doi: 10.1177/0002764211426331
    • Di Salvo, Philip, and Gianluigi Negro. 2015. “Framing Edward Snowden: A comparative analysis of four newspapers in China, United Kingdom and United States.” Journalism: 1-18. doi: 10.1177/1464884915595472
    • Snowden, Edward. 2016. “Foreword: Elected by circumstance.” The Assassination Complex. London: Serpent's Tail: xi-xviii.
    • Tankard Jr, James W., 2001. “The empirical approach to the study of media framing.” In Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, edited by Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy, and August E. Grant, 95-106. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    • Taylor, Roland. 2015. “The Need for a Paradigm Shift Toward Cybersecurity in Journalism.” National Cybersecurity Institute Journal. 1(3): 45-47.
    • Thorsen, Einar. 2017, forthcoming. “Whistleblowing in a Digital Age: journalism after Manning and Snowden.” In The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited by Bob Franklin and Scott Eldridge II, 569-578. London: Routledge.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article