LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bath, Deryn; Turner, Louise; Bosch, Andrew; Tucker, Ross; Lambert, Estelle; Thompson, Kevin; St Clair Gibson, Alan (2012)
Publisher: Human Kinetics
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C600

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: human activities
The aim of this study was to examine performance, pacing strategy and perception of effort during a 5-km time-trial while running with or without the presence of another athlete. \ud \ud Eleven non-elite male athletes participated in five 5-km time trials; two self-paced, maximal effort trials performed at the start (TT1) and end (TT2) of the study, and three trials performed in the presence of a second runner. In the three trials, the second runner ran either in front of the subject (Fast paced trial, FPT), behind the subject (Slow paced trial, SPT), or next to the subject (Equal paced trial, EPT). Performance times, heart rate, RPE, and a subjective assessment of the effect of the second runner on the athlete's performance were recorded during each of the trials. \ud \ud There was no significant difference in performance times, heart rate or RPE between any of the five trials. Running speed declined from the 1st to the 4th kilometre and then increased for the last kilometre in all five trials. Following the completion of all trials, nine of the eleven subjects perceived it to be easier to complete the 5-km time-trial with another runner in comparison to running alone. \ud \ud While the athletes perceived their performance to be improved by the presence of another runner, their pacing strategy, running speed, heart rate and RPE were not significantly altered. These findings indicate that an athlete's subconscious pacing strategy is robust and is not altered by the presence of another runner.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Foster C, Schrager M, Snyder AC, Thompson NN. Pacing strategy and athletic performance. Sports Med. 1994;17(2):77-85.
    • 2. Ulmer HV. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia. 1996;52(5):416-420.
    • 3. St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Rauch LH, et al. The role of information processing between the brain and peripheral physiological systems in pacing and perception of effort. Sports Med. 2006;36(8):705-722.
    • 4. Tucker R, Noakes TD. The physiological regulation of pacing strategy during exercise: a critical review. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(6):e1.
    • 5. Ansley L, Schabort E, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. Regulation of pacing strategies during successive 4-km time trials. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(10):1819-1825.
    • 6. Nikolopoulos V, Arkinstall MJ, Hawley JA. Pacing strategy in simulated cycle time-trials is based on perceived rather than actual distance. J Sci Med Sport. 2001;4(2):212- 219.
    • 7. Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: a novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans: summary and conclusions. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(2):120-124.
    • 8. Mauger AR, Jones AM, Williams CA. Influence of feedback and prior experience on pacing during a 4-km cycle time trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(2):451-458.
    • 9. St Clair Gibson A, Baden DA, Lambert MI, et al. The conscious perception of the sensation of fatigue. Sports Med. 2003;33(3):167-176.
    • 10. Baden DA, McLean TL, Tucker R, Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A. Effect of anticipation during unknown or unexpected exercise duration on rating of perceived exertion, affect, and physiological function. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):742-746, discussion 742-746.
    • 11. Ansley L, Robson PJ, St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD. Anticipatory pacing strategies during supramaximal exercise lasting longer than 30 s. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(2):309-314.
    • 12. Paterson S, Marino FE. Effect of deception of distance on prolonged cycling performance. Percept Mot Skills. 2004;98(3 Pt 1):1017-1026.
    • 13. Albertus Y, Tucker R, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Hampson DB, Noakes TD. Effect of distance feedback on pacing strategy and perceived exertion during cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(3):461-468.
    • 14. Faulkner J, Arnold T, Eston R. Effect of accurate and inaccurate distance feedback on performance markers and pacing strategies during running. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21. doi: .
    • 15. Kriel Y, Hampson DB, Lambert EV, et al. Visual stimulus deprivation and manipulation of auditory timing signals on pacing strategy. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;105(3 Pt 2):1227-1241.
    • 16. Perreault S, Vallerand RJ. Coming from behind: On the effect of psychological momentum on sport performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1998;20(4):421-436.
    • 17. Baron B, Moullan F, Deruelle F, Noakes TD. The role of emotions on pacing strategies and performance in middle and long duration sport events. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:511-517.
    • 18. St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, Lambert M, Hampson DB, Noakes TD. Exercise and Fatigue-Control Mechanisms. International SportMed Journal. 2001;2(3):1. (avaliable from www.esportmed.com/ismj/).
    • 19. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-381.
    • 20. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985.
    • 21. Pelletier LG, Tuson KM, Fortier MS, Vallerand RJ, Briere NM, Blais MR. Toward a New Measure of Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, and Amotivation in Sports-the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1995;17(1):35-53.
    • 22. Mauger AR, Jones AM, Williams CA. The effect of noncontingent and accurate performance feedback on pacing and time trial performance in 4-km track cycling. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(3):225-229.
    • 23. Hulleman M, De Koning JJ, Hettinga FJ, Foster C. The effect of extrinsic motivation on cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(4):709-715.
    • 24. Deci EL. Effects of Externally Mediated Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971;18(1):105- 115.
    • 25. St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD. Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(6):797-806.
    • 26. Jacobs A, Shiffrar M. Walking perception by walking observers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005;31(1):157-169.
    • 27. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13(2):400- 404.
    • 28. Gallese V. Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:3-12; discussion 12-19, 89-96, 216-221.
    • 29. Buekers M, Montagne G, de Rugy A, Laurent M. The regulation of externally paced human locomotion in virtual reality. Neurosci Lett. 1999;275(3):171-174.
    • 30. Foster C, Green MA, Snyder AC, Thompson NN. Physiological responses during simulated competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25(7):877-882.
    • 31. de Koning JJ, Bobbert MF, Foster C. Determination of optimal pacing strategy in track cycling with an energy lfow model. J Sci Med Sport. 1999;2(3):266-277.
    • 32. Garland SW. An analysis of the pacing strategy adopted by elite competitors in 2000 m rowing. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(1):39-42.
    • 33. Tucker R, Lambert MI, Noakes TD. An analysis of pacing strategies during men's world-record performances in track athletics. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006;1(3):233-245.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article