Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Schroeder, J; Yu-Hsun; Winney, I; Simons, MJP; Nakagawa, S; Burke, T (2016)
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Types: Article
Subjects: EXTRA-PAIR PATERNITY, PARENTAL CARE, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, IN-HOUSE SPARROWS, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, INDIRECT SELECTION, 06 Biological Sciences, PASSER-DOMESTICUS, SEXUAL SELECTION, mating systems, KIN RECOGNITION, DUNNOCKS PRUNELLA-MODULARIS, parental investment, Ecology, social feedback, Evolutionary Biology, Science & Technology, GENETIC SIMILARITY, monogamy, extrapair paternity, ARCT ET-AL
One predicted cost of female infidelity in socially monogamous\ud species is that cuckolded males should provide less parental\ud care. This relationship is robust across species, but evidence is ambiguous\ud within species. We do not know whether individual males reduce\ud their care when paired with cheating females compared with when\ud paired with faithful females (within-male adjustment) or, alternatively,\ud if the males that pair with cheating females are the same males that\ud provide less parental care in general (between-male effect). Our exceptionally\ud extensive long-term data set of repeated observations of a wild\ud passerine allows us to disentangle paternal care adjustment within\ud males—within pairs and between males—while accounting for environmental\ud variables. We found a within-male adjustment of paternal\ud provisioning, but not incubation effort, relative to the cuckoldry in\ud their nest. This effect was mainly driven by females differing consistently\ud in their fidelity. There was no evidence that this within-male adjustment\ud also took place across broods with the same female, and we\ud found no between-male effect. Interestingly, males that gained more\ud extrapair paternity provided less care. Data from a cross-foster experiment\ud suggested that males did not use kin recognition to assess paternity.\ud Our results provide insight into the role of individual variation in\ud parental care and mating systems.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article