Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Yoon, Yeosun; Chung, Heejung (2015)
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HN
There has been an increase in literature that examines the patterns of dualization in labour markets across different welfare states. However, rarely do these studies empirically explore how labour markets are divided. Rather they assume a certain type of division to exist in a market, and apply this assumption to measure the extent to which this division can be observed. This paper aims to overcome this limitation by examining the labour market dualization patterns of the UK’s employed population over the past decade through a latent class analysis model. Our analysis shows that the UK labour market could be characterised by a three group system during the period between 1999 and 2010. This divide supports the theoretical literature on labour market divisions in that there are clear distinctions between those who are insiders and those who are not. However, what is interesting is that rather than having a dichotomised pattern of division of insiders and outsiders, we find a third group which can be characterised as a “future insecure” group. What is more, the main characteristics that divide the groups are not contract types (involuntary part-time or temporary employment), but rather income levels (low pay), occupational profile (low-skilled occupations) and social security benefits stemming from employment (occupational pension coverage). From the results, we conclude that the patterns and characteristics of labour market divisions may not be generalised and further empirical investigations are needed to understand the cross-national variations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bartholomew, D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J. (2008). The Analysis of Multivariate Social science Data Chapman &Hall/CRC: Taylor & Francis.
    • Bennett, F. (2014). The "Living Wage', Low Pay and in Work Poverty: Rethinking the Relationships. Critical Social Policy, 34(1), 46-65.
    • Biegert, T. (2014). On the outside looking in? Transitions out of non-employment in the United Kingdom and Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(1), 3-18.
    • Blake, D. (2004). The Impact of Wealth on consumption and retirement behaviour in the UK Applied Financial Economics, 14(8), 555-576.
    • Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A. J., & Garrett, M. (1990). Insider Power in Wage Determination. NBER Working Paper No. 3179. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Blossfeld, H.-P., & Mayer, K. U. (1988). Labour Market Segmentation in the Federal Republic of Germany: An Empirical Study of Segmentation Theories From a Life Course Perspective. European Sociological Review, 4(2), 123-140.
    • Bonoli, G. (2007). Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks, and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies Comparative Political Studies, 40(5), 495-520.
    • Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2002). Temporary jobs: Stepping stone or dead ends? . Economic Journal, 112(480), F189-F213.
    • Bradshaw, J., Bennett, F., & Mayhew, E. (2010). In-Work Poverty and Labour Market Segmentation: A Study of National Policies. European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion: Brussels.
    • Branden, J. (2009). How Much Can We Learn From International Comparisons Of Intergenerational Mobility? (pp. DP111). Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
    • Bulow, J. I., & Summers, L. H. (1986). A Theory of Dual Labor Markets with Application to Industrial Policy, Discrimination and Keynesian Unemployment. Journal of Labor Economics, 4(3), 376-414.
    • Cappellari, L. (2002). Do the 'Working Poor' Stay Poor?: An analysis of Low-Pay Transition in Italy Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(2), 89-110.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article