Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Baumberg Geiger, Ben (2009)
Publisher: Oxford Univ Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H
Aims: The proportion of alcohol consumption that is above government guidelines ('risky drinking') has been estimated in several countries, suggesting that reductions in risky drinking would lead to significant declines in total alcohol consumption. However, this has not previously been conducted transparently in the UK. Furthermore, existing studies have under-explored the importance of several methodological decisions, as well as not closely examining the meaning of these figures for debates on 'corporate social responsibility' (CSR). Methods: Secondary analysis of the amount of alcohol consumption above various government guidelines in four British datasets for 2000-2002: the National Diet and Nutrition Survey; the General Household Survey; Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use among Young People; and the March 2002 ONS Omnibus Survey. Results: Risky drinking accounts for 55-82% of the total consumption by 18- to 64-year olds, depending on the definition of risky drinking used. If only alcohol above the government guidelines is counted, this falls to 22-475. Consumption by underage drinkers accounts for 4.5% of the total consumption, while consumption by drink-drivers accounts for 0.5-8.0% depending on the assumptions made. Conclusions: Methodologically, the study shows that at least two decisions have considerable importance: the definition of risky drinking used and whether we count all drinking (as in most previous studies) or only drinking above guidelines. Substantively, these studies do not directly show that drink companies' profitability would be affected by declines in risky drinking. Nevertheless, they are valuable for present debate in themselves and form the basis of a more complex analysis of alcohol CSR.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, P. (2003) The Beverage Alcohol Industry's Social Aspects Organizations: a public health warning. Eurocare.
    • Anderson, P. and Baumberg, B. (2006) Alcohol in Europe: a public health perspective. Institute of Alcohol Studies, London.
    • Bloomfield, K., Stockwell, T., Gmel, G. and Rehn, N. (2003) International comparisons of alcohol consumption. Alcohol Research and Health 27, 95.
    • Carpenter, J. and Bithell, J. (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Statistics in Medicine 19, 1141-1164.
    • Chief Medical Officers (2009) Draft Guidance on the Consumption of Alcohol by Children and Young People from the Chief Medical Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Department for Children, Schools and Families.
    • Department of Health (1995) Sensible Drinking: The Report of an Inter-Departmental Working Group.
    • Department of Health (2008) Safe, Sensible, Social - Consultation on further action. Department of Health, London.
    • Doran, C., Shakeshaft, A., Hall, W. and Petrie, D. (2009) Alcohol industry and government revenue derived from underage drinking by Australian adolescents 2005. Addictive Behaviors 34, 75-81.
    • Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, London.
    • Foster, S., Vaughan, R., Foster, W. and Califano, J. (2003) Alcohol consumption and expenditures for underage drinking and adult excessive drinking. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association 289, 989-995.
    • Foster, S., Vaughan, R., Foster, W. and Califano, J. (2006) Estimate of the commercial value of underage drinking and adult abusive and dependent drinking to the alcohol industry. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 160, 473-378.
    • Goddard, E. (2001) Obtaining information about drinking through surveys of the general population. Office for National Statistics.
    • Goddard, E. (2008) Estimating alcohol consumption from survey data: updated method of converting volumes to units. Office of National Statistics, Newport.
    • Greenfield, T. K. and Kerr, W. C. (2008) Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities. Addiction 103, 1082-1099.
    • Greenfield, T. K. and Rogers, J. D. (1999) Who drinks most of the alcohol in the U.S.? The policy implications. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 60, 78-89.
    • Hawks, D. (1993) Taking the alcohol industry seriously. Drug and Alcohol Review 12, 131-2.
    • ICAP (2003) International Drinking Guidelines. International Center for Alcohol Policy (ICAP), Washington, DC.
    • Kerr, W. and Greenfield, T. (2007) Distribution of alcohol consumption and expenditures and the impact of improved measurement on coverage of alcohol sales in the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 31, 1714-1722.
    • Lemmens, P., Heather, N., Peters, T. J. and Stockwell, T. (2001) Relationship of alcohol consumption and alcohol problems at the population level. In International handbook of alcohol dependence and problems, pp. 395-411.
    • Leverton, M., Buckingham, J., Naclerio, S., Crutcher, M., Alexander, B., Willersdorf, G., Montijn, S., Simpson, R., Jones, M., Macdonald, J. and Botha, A. (2000) 'Perils of partnerships': comments on an editorial. Addiction 95, 1430-1431.
    • Miller, T., Levy, D., Spicer, R. and Taylor, D. (2006) Societal costs of underage drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 67, 519-528.
    • PMSU (2004) Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy for England: March 2004. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit (PMSU), Cabinet Office, London.
    • Rehm, J., Room, R. and Taylor, B. (2008) Method for moderation: measuring lifetime risk of alcohol-attributable mortality as a basis for drinking guidelines. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 17, 141-151.
    • Stockwell, T., Sturge, J. and Macdonald, S. (2005) Patterns of Risky Alcohol Use in British Columbia - Results of the 2004 Canadian Addictions Survey. Centre for Addictions Research of BC (CARBC).
    • Stockwell, T., Zhao, J., Chikritzhs, T. and Greenfield, T. K. (2008) What did you drink yesterday? Public health relevance of a recent recall method used in the 2004 Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey. Addiction 103, 919-928.
    • White, I. R., Altmann, D. and Nanchahal, K. (2002) Alcohol consumption and mortality: modelling risks for men and women at different ages. British Medical Journal 325, 191-198.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article