Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hunt, K.J.; Munih, M.; Donaldson, N.; Barr, F.M.D. (1998)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: R1
This paper considers part of the problem of how to provide unsupported standing for paraplegics by feedback control. In this work our overall objective is to stabilize the subject by stimulation only of his ankle joints while the other joints are braced, Here, we investigate the problem of ankle joint moment control. The ankle plantarflexion muscles are first identified with pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) signals, periodic sinusoidal signals, and twitches. The muscle is modeled in Hammerstein form as a static recruitment nonlinearity followed by a linear transfer function. A linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG)-optimal controller design procedure for ankle joint moment was proposed based on the polynomial equation formulation, The approach was verified by experiments in the special Wobbler apparatus with a neurologically intact subject, and these experimental results are reported. The controller structure is formulated in such a way that there are only two scalar design parameters, each of which has a clear physical interpretation. This facilitates fast controller synthesis and tuning in the laboratory environment. Experimental results show the effects of the controller tuning parameters: the control weighting and the observer response time, which determine closed-loop properties. Using these two parameters the tradeoff between disturbance rejection and measurement noise sensitivity can be straightforwardly balanced while maintaining a desired speed of tracking. The experimentally measured reference tracking, disturbance rejection, and noise sensitivity are good and agree with theoretical expectations.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] L. A. Benton, L. L. Baker, B. R. Bowman, and R. L. Waters, “Functional electrical stimulation-A practical clinical guide,” Rancho Los Amigos Rehabilitation Engineering Center, Downey, CA, Tech. Rep., 1981.
    • [2] A. Kantrowitz, “Electronic physiological aids,” Maimonides Hospital of Brooklyn, NY, Tech. Rep. 1963.
    • [3] A. Kralj and T. Bajd, Functional Electrical Stimulation: Walking and Standing After Spinal Cord Injury. Florida: CRC, 1989.
    • [4] D. J. Ewins, P. N. Taylor, S. E. Crook, R. T. Liczynski, and I. D. Swain, “Practical low cost sit/stand system for mid-thoracic paraplegics,” J. Biomed. Eng., vol. 10, pp. 184-188, 1988.
    • [5] A. J. Mulder, H. B. K. Boom, H. J. Hermens, and G. Zilvold, “Artificialreflex stimulation for FES-induced standing with minimum quadriceps force,” Med. and Biol. Eng. and Comput., vol. 28, pp. 483-488, 1990.
    • [6] D. N. Rushton, N. Donaldson, F. M. D. Barr, V. J. Harper, T. A. Perkins, P. N. Taylor, and A. M. Tromans, “Lumbar anterior root stimulator for lower limb control in paraplegia,” in Neuroprosthetics: From Basic Research to Clinical Application, A. Pedotti, M. Ferrarin, J. Quintern, and R. Riener, Eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
    • [7] H. M. Franken, P. H. Veltink, G. Baardman, R. A. Redmeyer, and H. B. K. Boom, “Cycle-by-cycle control of swing phase of paraplegic gait induced by surface electrical stimulation,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 33, pp. 440-451, 1995.
    • [8] J. Quintern, R. Riener, and S. Rupprecht, “Comparison of simulation and experiments of different closed-loop strategies for FES-Part 2: Experiments in paraplegics,” in Proc. 5th Vienna Int. Workshop on Functional Electrostimulation, 1995, pp. 255-258.
    • [9] P. E. Crago, M. Lemay, and L. Liu, “External control of limb movements involving environmental interactions,” in Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization, J. M. Winters and S. L. Woo, Eds. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
    • [10] J. T. Mortimer, “Motor prostheses,” in Handbook of Physiology-The Nervous System II, J. M. Brookhart, V. B. Mountcastle, V. B. Brooks, and S. R. Geiger, Eds. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Soc., 1981, pp. 155-187.
    • [11] G. I. Zahalak, “An overview of muscle modeling,” in Neural Prostheses, R. B. Stein, P. H. Peckham, and D. B. Popovic, Eds. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 17-57.
    • [12] N. Donaldson and C.-H. Yu, “FES standing: Control by handle reactions of leg muscle stimulation (CHRELMS),” IEEE Trans. Rehab., vol. 4, Dec. 1996.
    • [13] N. Donaldson, H. Gollee, K. J. Hunt, J. C. Jarvis, and M. K. N. Kwende, “A radial basis function model of muscle stimulated with irregular inter-pulse intervals,” Med. Eng. and Phys., vol. 17, pp. 431-441, Sept. 1995.
    • [14] H. Gollee and K. J. Hunt, “Nonlinear modeling and control of electrically stimulated muscle: A local model network approach,” Int J. Contr., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1259-1288, 1997.
    • [15] H. Gollee, K. J. Hunt, N. Donaldson, and J. C. Jarvis, “Modeling of electrically stimulated muscle,” in Multiple Model Approaches to Modeling and Control, R. Murray-Smith and T. A. Johansen, Eds. Taylor and Francis, 1997, Ch. 3, pp. 101-120.
    • [16] H. J. Chizeck, “Adaptive and nonlinear control methods for neural prostheses,” in Neural Prostheses, R. B. Stein, P. H. Peckham, and D. B. Popovic, Eds. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 298-328.
    • [17] N. Donaldson, F. M. D. Barr, G. F. Phillips, and T. A. Perkins, “Unsupported standing of paraplegics by stimulation of the plantarflexors: Some results from the Wobbler apparatus,” in Neuroprosthetics: From Basic Research to Clinical Application, A. Pedotti, M. Ferrarin, J. Quintern, and R. Riener, Eds. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
    • [18] N. Donaldson, “Practical ankle controllers for unsupported standing in paraplegia,” in Proc. Ljubljana FES Conf., 1993, pp. 61-64.
    • [19] T. J. Bajzek and R. J. Jaeger, “Characterization and control of muscle response to electrical stimulation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 15, pp. 485-501, 1987.
    • [20] V. Kucˇera, Discrete Linear Control: The Polynomial Equation Approach. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley, 1979.
    • [21] K. J. Hunt, “Stochastic optimal control theory with application in selftuning control,” in Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 117. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
    • [22] D. C. Youla and J. J. Bongiorno, “A feedback theory of two degree of freedom Wiener-Hopf design,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 30, pp. 652-665, 1985.
    • [23] H. Kwakernaak and R. Sivan, Linear Optimal Control Systems. New York: Wiley, 1972.
    • [24] J. Jezˇek and K. J. Hunt, “Coupled polynomial equations for LQ control synthesis and an algorithm for solution,” Int. J. Contr., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1155-1167, 1993.
    • [25] M. Munih, K. J. Hunt, and N. Donaldson, “LQG control for the ankle joint moment,” in Proc. ICMMB Conf., Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1996.
    • [26] M. Munih, K. J. Hunt, N. Donaldson, and F. M. D. Barr, “LQG moment control in the paraplegic's ankle joint,” in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1996.
    • [27] K. J. Hunt, M. Munih, and N. Donaldson, “Feedback control of unsupported standing in paraplegia-Part I: Optimal control approach,” IEEE Trans. Rehabilitation Eng., vol. 5, pp. 331-340, 1997.
    • [28] M. Munih, N. Donaldson, K. J. Hunt, and F. M. D. Barr, “Feedback control of unsupported standing in paraplegia-Part II: Experimental results,” IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng., vol. 5, pp. 341-352, 1997.
    • [29] V. Kucˇera, Analysis and Design of Discrete Linear Control Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
    • [30] K. J. A˚ stro¨m and B. Wittenmark, Computer Controlled Systems: Theory and Design, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1997.
    • [31] G. F. Phillips, J. R. Adler, and S. J. G. Taylor, “A portable programmable eight-channel surface stimulator,” in Proc. Ljubljana FES Conf., 1993, pp. 166-168.
    • [32] W. K. Durfee and K. E. Maclean, “Methods of estimating the isometric recruitment curve of electrically stimulated muscle,” Trans. IEEE Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, pp. 654-667, 1989.
    • [33] L. Ljung and T. So¨derstro¨m, Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification. London, U.K.: MIT Press, 1983.
    • [34] L. Ljung, System Identification-Theory for the User. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.
    • [35] K. J. Hunt, M. Munih, N. Donaldson, and F. M. D. Barr, “Investigation of the Hammerstein hypothesis in the modeling of electrically stimulated muscle,” IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng., to be published.
    • [36] A. Ishida and S. Miyazaki, “Maximum likelihood identification of a posture control system,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 1-5, 1987.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article