Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Charlwood, J Derek; Tomás, Elsa VE; Kelly-Hope, Louise; Briët, Olivier JT (2014)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: Parasites & Vectors
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Body site preference, qx_650, Landing, qx_20, Invitation effect, qx_525, Cambodia, Research, Stegomyia albopicta
Background\ud \ud Orientation of haematophagous insects towards a potential host is largely mediated by kairomones that, in some groups or species may include chemicals produced during feeding by the insects themselves, the so called ‘invitation’ effect.\ud \ud Methods\ud \ud The ‘invitation’ effect in blood-feeding diurnally active Stegomyia albopicta was investigated over 33 days in secondary forest in Mondolkiri Province, Cambodia. Two human volunteers sitting inside a shelter collected mosquitoes and noted where and when they landed. A 10% emanator of a synthetic pyrethroid with high vapour action was in use on alternate days.\ud \ud Results\ud \ud Overall, 2726 mosquitoes were collected, 1654 of which had the landing site recorded. The heads of the volunteers were the locations with the highest density of landings per surface area whilst the knees and elbows accounted for most of the landings received on the arms and legs. Landings recorded within three minutes of each other on a collector were about 2.5 times more likely to be on the same body part than on a random body part, weighted for landing site preference. This preference did not vary with collector or pyrethroid.\ud \ud Conclusions\ud \ud The ‘invitation’ effect may be due to a semio-chemical produced early in the feeding process. Incorporation of such a chemical into traps designed to control this important vector of dengue and chikungunya viruses might potentially improve their attractiveness.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Charlwood JD, Paru R, Dagaro H: Raised platforms reduce mosquito bites. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1984, 78:141-142.
    • 2. de Jong R, Knols BGJ: Selection of biting sites on man by two malaria mosquito species. Experientia 1995, 51:80-84.
    • 3. Gillett JD: Mosquitoes. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1971.
    • 4. Alekseev AN, Rasnitsyn SP, Vitlin LM: On aggregative behaviour of female bloodsucking mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicidae, Aedes). Part I. Discovery of the “invitation effect”. Meditsinskaya Parazitologiya i Parazitarnie Bolezni 1977, 46:23-24 [In Russian].
    • 5. Ahmadi A, McClelland GAH: Mosquito-mediated attraction of female mosquitoes to a host. Physiol Entomol 1985, 10:251-255.
    • 6. Cavanagh S, Townson H: Evidence for an aggregation pheromone in feeding mosquitoes. Trans R Soc 1986, 80:334.
    • 7. Charlwood JD, Billingsley PF, Hoc TQ: Mosquito-mediated attraction of female European but not African mosquitoes. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1995, 89:327-329.
    • 8. Schlein Y, Yuval B, Warburg A: Aggregation pheromone released from the palps of feeding female Phlebotomus papatasi (Psychodidae). J Insect Physiol 1984, 30:153-156.
    • 9. McCall PJ, Lemoh PA: Evidence for the “invitation” effect during bloodfeeding by blackflies of the Simulium damnosum complex (Diptera:Simulidae). J Ins Behav 1997, 10:299-303.
    • 10. Blackwell A, Dyer C, AJ M (L), Wadhams LJ, Mordue W: Field and laboratory evidence for a volatile pheromone produced by parous females of the Scottish biting midge, Culicoides impunctatus. Physiol Entomol 1994, 19:251-257.
    • 11. Rezza G: Aedes albopictus and the re-emergence of Dengue. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:72.
    • 12. Fitzpatrick TB: "Soleil et peau" [Sun and skin]. J Méd Esthét 1975, 2:33-34 (in French).
    • 13. Rattanarithikul R, Harbach RE, Harrison BA, Panthusiri P, Coleman RE, Richardson JH: Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand VI. Tribe Aedini. S E Asian J Trop Med Pub Hlth 2010, 41(Suppl. 1):225.
    • 14. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF: A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Int Med 1916, 17:863-871. http://www.cato.eu/body-surface-area.html.
    • 15. Kawada H, Iwasaki T, Le Loan L, Tien TK, Mai NT, Shono Y, Katayama Y, Takagi M: Field evaluation of spatial repellency of metofluthrin-impregnated latticework plastic strips against Aedes aegypti (L.) and analysis of environmental factors affecting its efficacy in My Tho City, Tien Giang, Vietnam. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006, 75:1153-1157.
    • 16. Tripet F, Clegg S, Elnaiem D-E, Ward RD: Cooperative blood-feeding and the function and implications of feeding aggregations in the sand fly, Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009, 3(8):e503. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000503.
    • 17. Hawley WA: The Biology of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc Suppl 1988, 1:1-39.
    • 18. Mattingly PF: Intercurrent resting, a neglected aspect of mosquito behaviour. Cahiers ORSTOMSérie Ent Méd Parasit 1965, 3:187.
    • 19. Wharton RH: The biology of Mansonia mosquitoes in relation to the transmission of filariasis in Malaya. Bull Inst Med Res Fed Malaya 1962, 11:1-112.
    • 20. Clements AN: The biology of mosquitoes. Vol 2 Sensory reception and behaviour. London: CABI publishing; 1999.
    • 21. Mackenzie JS, Gubler DJ, Petersen LR: Emerging flaviviruses: the spread and resurgence of Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and dengue viruses. Nat Med 2004, 10:S98-S109.
    • 22. Siljander E, Gries R, Khaskin G, Gries G: Identification of the airborne aggregation pheromone of the Common Bed Bug, Cimex lectularius. J Chem Ecol 2008, 34:708-718.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article