Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Reza Ramazani, M.; Sewell, Philip; Noroozi, Siamak; Khanadan, R.; Cripps, Bob (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Current methods of estimating the behaviour of marine composite structures under pressure due to slamming as a result of high waves are based on trial and error or oversimplification. Normally under these conditions the nonlinearities of these structures are often neglected and in order to compensate, an overestimated safety factor is employed. These conservative approaches can result in heavier and overdesigned structures. In this paper a new semi-empirical method is proposed that overcomes some of these problems. This work involved the use of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) combined with strain gauge data to enable real-time in-service load monitoring of large marine structural panels. Such a tool has other important applications such as monitoring slamming or other transient hydrostatic loads that can ultimately affect their fatigue life. To develop this system a Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composite panel was used due to its potential for providing a nonlinear response to pressure or slamming loads. It was found the ANN was able to predict normal loads applied at different locations on the panel accurately. This method is also capable of predicting loads on the marine structure in real-time.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. W J Pierson, 'A unified mathematical theory for the analysis of propagation and refraction of storm-generated ocean surface waves', part i and ii, New York University, New York, 1952.
    • 2. M St Denis and W J Pierson, 'On the motions of ships in confused seas', SNAME Transactions, Vol 61, 1953.
    • 3. W J Pierson, G Neumann and R W James, 'Practical methods for observing and forecasting ocean waves by means of wave spectra and statistics', Hydrographic Office Publication, 1955.
    • 4. N Hogben, N M C Dacunha and G F Olliver, Global Wave Statistics, Unwin Brothers Ltd, UK, 1986.
    • 5. Y Bai, Marine Structural Design, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, 2003.
    • 6. B V Korvin-Kroukovsky, 'Investigation of ship motions in regular waves', SNAME Transactions, Vol 63, pp 386-435, 1955.
    • 7. J Gerritsma and W Beukelman, 'The distribution of the hydrodynamic forces on a heaving and pitching ship model in still water', paper presented at the Fifth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Washington, 1964.
    • 8. R E D Bishop and W G Price, Hydroelasticity of Ships, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.
    • 9. B P Phelps, 'Determination of wave loads for ship structural analysis', DSTO Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, Melbourne, 1997.
    • 10. J D Clarke, 'Wave loading of warships', Journal of Naval Science, Vol 12, No 4, 1986.
    • 11. T Kukkanen, 'Wave load predictions for marine structures', Rakenteiden Mekaniikka (Journal of Structural Mechanics), Vol 43, No 3, pp 150-166, 2010.
    • 12. H Iwashita, A Ito, T Okada, M Ohkusu, M Takaki and S Mizoguchi, 'Wave force acting on a blunt ship with forward speed in oblique sea', Journal of Society Naval Architecture Japan, Vol 176, 1994.
    • 13. D Nakos and P Sclavounos, 'Ship motions by a threedimensional rankine panel method', paper presented at the Proceedings of 18th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor, 1990.
    • 14. K Takagi, 'Calculation of unsteady pressure by rankine source method', Journal of Kansai Society of Naval Architecture, Vol 219, pp 47-56, 1993.
    • 15. H Yasukawa, 'A rankine panel method to calculate unsteady ship hydrodynamic forces', Journal of Society Naval Architecture, Vol 168, pp 131-140, 1990.
    • 16. X Cao, Y Sugiyama and Y Mitsui, 'Application of artificial neural networks to load identification', Computers & Structures, Vol 69, pp 63-67, 1998.
    • 17. R Amali, S Noroozi and J Vinney, 'The application of combined artificial neural network and finite element method in domain problems', paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (EANN 2000), Kingston upon Thames, 2000.
    • 18. R Amali, S Noroozi, J Vinney, P Sewell and S Andrews, 'Predicting interfacial loads between the prosthetic socket and the residual limb for below-knee amputees - a case study', Strain, Vol 42, pp 3-10, 2006.
    • 19. P Sewell, S Noroozi, J Vinney, R Amali and S Andrews, 'Improvements in the accuracy of an inverse problem engine's output for the prediction of below-knee prosthetic socket interfacial loads', Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Vol 23, pp 1000-1011, 2010.
    • 20. M R Ramazani, S Noroozi, M Koohgilani, B Cripps and P Sewell, 'Determination of static pressure loads on a marine composite panel from strain measurements utilising artificial neural networks', submitted to Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: J Eng for the Maritime Environment, 1475090212449231, first published on 25 June 2012, doi:10.1177/1475090212449231
    • 21. A P Boresi, R J Schmidt and O M Sidebottom, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, Fifth Edition, John Wiley, 1993.
    • 22. H M Westergaard and W A Salter, 'Moments and stresses in slabs', Proceedings of Amer Concrete Inst, Vol 17, pp 415-538, 1921.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article