Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Berry, E (2002)
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters
Languages: English
Types: Article
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • See, for example, the Canadian Bar Association Resolution 00-03-A Multi-Disciplinary Practices, (2000) August and Resolution 00-01-M Multi-Disciplinary Practices (2001) February, both at http://www.cba.org/; The Law Society of England and Wales Multi-Disciplinary Partnerships: Why? Why not? (1998) October, http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/dcs/third_tier.asp?section_id=893; The Association of Corporate Counsel of America Policy Statement of the Board of Directors on Multidisciplinary Partnerships (1999) 6 February http://www.acca.com/gcadvocate/multi.html and the Law Council of Australia (1999) Policy Statement on Multi-Disciplinary Partnerships http://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/mdppol.htm.
    • ABA Commission on Multidisciplinary http://www.abanet.org/cpr/mdpfinalrep2000.html.
    • See, for example, the Disney Corporation's rejection of a proposal to use the same firm to provide its auditing and consulting services (AccountingWEB “Disney to Split Audit and Consulting Firms Despite Shareholder OK” (2002) 21 February: www.accountingweb.co.uk).
    • Jonathan Goldsmith quoted in J. Cahill “MDPs suffer European setback” (2002) 16(9) The Lawyer 2. See also the Note for the informal Ecofin Council at Oviedo 12 & 13 April 2002 and Accounting WEB “Audit Survey Enron--UK reactions and remedies” (2002) May http://www.accountingweb.co.uk which indicated that 49% of auditors and 54% of accountants in practice thought that the Enron collapse proved that auditors were too involved with their clients.
    • Case C-41/90, Höfner and Elsner v. Macrotron [1991] E.C.R. I-1979; [1993] 4 C.M.L.R. 306, para. 21.
    • Joined Cases C 180-184/98, Pavlov and others v. Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten [2000] E.C.R. I-6451; [2001] 4 C.M.L.R. 30, para. 77.
    • See, for example, Joined Cases 56 and 58/64, Établissements Consten SA and Grundig GmbH v. Commission [1966] E.C.R. 299; [1966] C.M.L.R. 418.
    • See, for example, Decision 1999/152 [2000] O.J. L93/1, as amended by Regulation 1310/97 [1997] O.J. L180/1.
    • See, for example, Case 8/72, Vereeniging van Cementhandelaren v. Commission [1972] E.C.R. 977; [1973] C.M.L.R. 7, para. 29.
    • See the Law Society, op.cit. n. 1 and Multi-Disciplinary Partnerships: Proposals for the way forward (1999) 13 October, and the Law Society Multi Disciplinary Practice Working Party Multi-Disciplinary Practices: Interim Report (2000) 23 June, Multi-Disciplinary Practices: Third Interim Report (2000) 7 December, and Multi-Disciplinary Practices: Fourth Interim Report (2001) 15 March, all at http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/dcs/third tier.asp?section_id=3169&Caller_ID.
    • Director General of Fair Trading Competition in professions (2001) March (London, OFT), http://www.oft.gov.uk/html/rsearch/reports/oft328.htm and the Office of Fair Trading A Review of Competition Restrictions in the Professions: A Consultation Document (2000) May http://www.oft.gov.uk/html/new/professions5-00.htm.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article